Life Site News article

If this topic had been in FAVOR of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ "marriage" it would have
been big news.  It would have been Monday's headlines.  But like so
often happens when there is REAL NEWS that is inconvenient for the
Liberalism run rampant in the MSM, news editors universally know not
to cover it, even without being told not to cover it.  They Just Know.

But here are "out-of-the-closet" Sodomites with a hint of some sense of
right and wrong - that children SUFFER when they are raised without a
father OR without a mother.  

They SUFFER when their parents are two women OR two men.

And the law of the land has always been to PROTECT the rights of the
children, NOT to protect the so-called rights of adults to "have" children.



"...this potent coalition may stop
ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ marriage in France."




We'll know we're making REAL progress when we can talk about the only
rights that matter:  the rights of God!






 News
Print Article  |   Email Friend  |  Reprint Permissions

French ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs
demonstrate against
same-sex ‘marriage’

by Wendy Wright

    Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:43 EST
    Comments (7)
    Tags: france, jean marc, same-sex 'marriage'

NEW YORK, January 18, 2013, (C-FAM) - Perhaps as many as a million people marched in Paris last Sunday and at French embassies around the world against proposed legislation that would legalize same-sex marriage in France.  One of the surprises in the French campaign for traditional marriage is that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs have joined pro-family leaders and activists in the effort.


Jean-Marc

Jean-Marc French Mayor

“The rights of children trump the right to children,” was the catchphrase of protesters like Jean-Marc, a French mayor -- who is also ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ.

Even though France is known for its laissez faire attitude toward sex, pro-family leaders were quick to organize huge numbers. When President Hollande announced his intentions to legalize ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ marriage last November, a demonstration against the proposal gathered 100,000 protesters. And then what started as a debate about ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ rights changed to one about a child’s right to a mother and a father, and the numbers in opposition exploded and has come to include unlikely allies.

Xavier Bongibault, an atheist ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, is a prominent spokesman against the bill. “In France, marriage is not designed to protect the love between two people. French marriage is specifically designed to provide children with families,” he said in an interview. “[T]he most serious study done so far...demonstrates quite clearly that a child has trouble being raised by gαy parents.”

Jean Marc, who has lived with a man for 20 years, insists, “The LGBT movement that speaks out in the media...They don’t speak for me. As a society we should not be encouraging this. It’s not biologically natural.”

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

Outraged by the bill, 66 year-old Jean-Dominique Bunel, a specialist in humanitarian law who has done relief work in war-torn areas, told Le Figaro he “was raised by two women” and that he  “suffered from the lack of a father, a daily presence, a character and a properly masculine example, some counterweight to the relationship of my mother to her lover. I was aware of it at a very early age. I lived that absence of a father, experienced it, as an amputation."

"As soon as I learned that the government was going to officialize marriage between two people of the same sex, I was thrown into disarray,” he explained. It would be “institutionalizing a situation that had scarred me considerably. In that there is an injustice that I can in no way allow." If the women who raised him had been married, “I would have jumped into the fray and would have brought a complaint before the French state and before the European Court of Human Rights, for the violation of my right to a mom and a dad."

A pro-family coalition that includes ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs is certainly different than in the United States and likely most places around the world. It is unclear why at least some French ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs would not only favor man-woman marriage only, but would campaign against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ marriage. It could be that France has allowed for civil unions, for all couples, for more than a decade. Whatever the reason, this potent coalition may stop ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ marriage in France.

France’s National Assembly will take up the bill on January 29.

Reprinted from C-FAM.


___________________________________________


 Showing 7 comments

    Carmen Rosa Hill

    Oh wow. Reason based on biological and natural fact is a rarity among leading ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs here. I am very impressed and struck.
        Like
        Reply
        1 day ago
        28 Likes
    Knight of Mary

    Perhaps some European countries are more family based, especially the Catholic ones. In North America, we are more individualistic (what I want) and materialistic (the child is regarded as a possession- an accessory to a 'married lifestyle', white picket fence, house in the burbs, granite kitchen counter tops etc.). Marriage is not a lifestyle that we design ourselves..., one does not 'get' married... it is a natural institution that we 'enter into', which has properties that distinguishes it from all the others.
        Like
        Reply
        1 day ago
        18 Likes
    Martina Hatch

    Many blessings should go to these wise and brave men. Maybe now people will listen to reason.
        Like
        Reply
        1 day ago
        10 Likes
    Richard Beckwith

    Marriage unites a man and woman with each other and any children born from their union.  That is a fact that can only be recognized and never changed.  The problem with “marriage equality” is that committed relationships between same-sex and opposite-sex couples would have to be publicly recognized as equal in value to society.  That would make it discriminatory for traditional private and public institutions to promote the unique public interest of marriage as being between a man and a woman despite its unique live-giving act.
        Like
        Reply
        1 day ago
        10 Likes
    Karie Mitchell

    Thank God that these men who have SSAD understand that the relationship they have is NOT the same as the one between a man and a woman.  If only more people were understanding.  I hope that this will open the eyes of those in the French government that what they are about to do is WRONG for children.
        Like
        Reply
        1 day ago
        8 Likes
    clintoncps

    In opposing ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ "marriage" and adoption of children, the men in this article are revealing that, despite their own ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ practices, they still retain a concept of what it means to be human.

    I suspect they realize, intuitively, that they are not "ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs", but rather men who have embraced sɛҳuąƖ depravity under the guise of this deceptive label by which so many are fooled.  They know, innately, that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ practice is not natural, and they are appalled at the idea of trying to pervert the most basic realities of human life and self-awareness -- maleness and femaleness, family, and children -- with sɛҳuąƖly insane ideologies.

    Clearly, some ideologies are so vile (like the "queering" of children in schools) that they must be disgorged, even by those who might be expected to be sympathetic.

    I pray that this is the first step in conversion to Christ for...
    show more
        Like
        Reply
        17 hours ago
        5 Likes
    Caesar J. B. Squitti

    To believe that all discrimination is legal or illegal, correct or incorrect misses the logical half of the argument; God's logic is black or white, mankinds is merely colors, yet still there are differernces.
        Like
        Reply
        20 hours ago
        1 Like