Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: XavierSem - Will He Answer the Simple Question?  (Read 4014 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

XavierSem - Will He Answer the Simple Question?
« on: February 18, 2021, 01:13:07 PM »
This thread is dedicated solely to getting a simple answer from CI Member XavierSem


Last Tradhican asks for 7th time:

all I need to know is just if you reject these examples of salvation by implicit faith below , very simple, yes or no?

 
 Do you reject these examples of salvation by implicit faith, the teaching that non-Catholics can be saved by their belief in a god that rewards?
:
 
 From the book  Against the Heresies, by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre:
 
 1. Page 216: “Evidently, certain distinctions must be made.  Souls can be saved in a religion other than the Catholic religion (Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism, etc.), but not by this religion.  There may be souls who, not knowing Our Lord, have by the grace of the good Lord, good interior dispositions, who submit to God...But some of these persons make an act of love which implicitly is equivalent to baptism of desire.  It is uniquely by this means that they are able to be saved.”
 
 2.Page 217: “One cannot say, then, that no one is saved in these religions…”
 
 Pages 217-218: “This is then what Pius IX said and what he condemned.  It is necessary to understand the formulation that was so often employed by the Fathers of the Church:  ‘Outside the Church there is no salvation.’  When we say that, it is incorrectly believed that we think that all the Protestants, all the Moslems, all the Buddhists, all those who do not publicly belong to the Catholic Church go to hell.  Now, I repeat, it is possible for someone to be saved in these religions, but they are saved by the Church, and so the formulation is true: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.  This must be preached.”
 
 Bishop Bernard Fellay, Conference in Denver, Co., Feb. 18, 2006: “We know that there are two other baptisms, that of desire and that of blood. These produce an invisible but real link with Christ but do not produce all of the effects which are received in the baptism of water… And the Church has always taught that you have people who will be in heaven, who are in the state of grace, who have been saved without knowing the Catholic Church. We know this. And yet, how is it possible if you cannot be saved outside the Church? It is absolutely true that they will be saved through the Catholic Church because they will be united to Christ, to the Mystical Body of Christ, which is the Catholic Church. It will, however, remain invisible, because this visible link is impossible for them. Consider a Hindu in Tibet who has no knowledge of the Catholic Church. He lives according to his conscience and to the laws which God has put into his heart. He can be in the state of grace, and if he dies in this state of grace, he will go to heaven.” (The Angelus, “A Talk Heard Round the World,” April, 2006, p. 5.)

Re: XavierSem - Will He Answer the Simple Question?
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2021, 01:24:00 PM »
Perhaps XavierSem works a few cubicles down from poche in Hasbara's department of internet propaganda and cognitive manipulation?


Re: XavierSem - Will He Answer the Simple Question?
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2021, 02:10:37 PM »
Now that the Catholic Church has wrecked itself and 99% blindly follow Francis the destroyer, there is not much salvation inside it either.

I'd say I am reasonably sure, 90% that both the sincere and virtuous Tibetan monk and the modern contracepted Catholic Democrat mother and father of two children are BOTH damned.

The second most likely option 10% is that the monk is saved and the modern Catholic Biden supporting parents are damned.   The monk has at least been as virtuous as he could be.

I would assume the Good Samaritan went to heaven otherwise what was the point of the story?  I know he was fictional but such people exist in real life.  I don't see how in justice a Samaritan who did not know Christ is saved but a Tibetan monk is not. 

If they are both saved, then that is in effect universal salvation.  So what is the point in my bothering to be good and avoid sin?  So both saved is impossible as far as I am concerned.  It is fundamentally against justice. 

I don't understand myself how the Church has not defected.  It appears to have done just that.  I am caught in a paradox.  It is miserable

Re: XavierSem - Will He Answer the Simple Question?
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2021, 02:28:12 PM »
Now that the Catholic Church has wrecked itself and 99% blindly follow Francis the destroyer, there is not much salvation inside it either......
Please ask your questions elsewhere, all your posting will accomplish is that XavierSem will now spam this thread.
This thread is strictly to get one answer. I'll answered your question in the St. John Vianney thread

Re: XavierSem - Will He Answer the Simple Question?
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2021, 05:55:09 PM »
cricket cricket cricket cricket