Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?  (Read 7629 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
  • Reputation: +7174/-12
  • Gender: Male
Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
« Reply #60 on: May 12, 2013, 12:01:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne
    Are you a sede?  If so, your religion is one without an authority.  "He who hears you, hears me" (CCC, #87) does not have any meaning in your religion.


    That's rather ridiculous. Sedevacantism is Traditional Catholicism, not a separate religion. Sedes acknowledge Our Lord Jesus Christ as their authority.

    Also, the CCC is a joke.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Conspiracy_Factist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 598
    • Reputation: +157/-19
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #61 on: May 12, 2013, 01:44:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne
    Quote from: saintbosco13
    We already reviewed the full list of teachings from the Church on baptism of desire and baptism of blood when we discussed them in the discussion titled, "Baptismofdesire.com". The quotes are all listed on the homepage there. My point above is that they need not be solemn decrees.


    SB13,

    Are you a sede?  If so, your religion is one without an authority.  "He who hears you, hears me" (CCC, #87) does not have any meaning in your religion.  As for your "not so fine" website, are you going to admit to your viewers that you are a sede?  State that fact, explicitly, on your webpage that you are a sede and that you reject the validity and authority of the Church's Magisterium.


    a little off topic but since you bring up sedes, what do you think about these quotes from Lefebvre?


    Archbishop Lefebvre, Aug. 4, 1976: “The Council [Vatican II] turned its back on Tradition and broke with the Church of the past.  It is a schismatic council… If we are certain that the Faith taught by the Church for twenty centuries can contain no error, we are much less certain that the pope is truly pope.  Heresy, schism, excommunication ipso facto, or invalid election are all causes that can possibly mean the pope was never pope, or is no longer pope… Because ultimately, since the beginning of Paul VI’s pontificate, the conscience and faith of all Catholics have been faced with a serious problem.  How is it that the pope, the true successor of Peter, who is assured of the help of the Holy Ghost, can officiate at the destruction of the Church – the most radical, rapid, and widespread in her history – something that no heresiarch has ever managed to achieve?”[11]

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Sermon, Aug. 29, 1976: “The new rite of Mass is an illegitimate rite, the sacraments are illegitimate sacraments, the priests who come from the seminaries are illegitimate priests…”[12]

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Meeting with Paul VI, Sept. 11, 1976: “[The docuмent of Vatican II on religious liberty] contains passages that are word for word contrary to what was taught by Gregory XVI, and Pius IX.”[13]

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Sermon, Feb. 22, 1979: “Insofar as it is opposed to Tradition, we reject the Council [Vatican II].”[14]

     

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Sermon, Easter, 1986: “This is the situation in which we find ourselves.  I have not created it.  I would die to make it go away!  We are faced with a serious dilemma which, I believe, has never existed in the Church: the one seated on the chair of Peter takes part in the worship of false gods.  What conclusions will we have to draw, perhaps in a few months’ time, faced with these repeated acts of taking part in the worship of false religions, I do not know.  But I do wonder.  It is possible that we might be forced to believe that the pope is not the pope.  Because it seems to me initially – I do not yet want to say it solemnly and publicly – that it is impossible for a pope to be publicly and formally heretical.”[15]

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Sermon, Aug. 27, 1986: “He who now sits upon the Throne of Peter mocks publicly the first article of the Creed and the first Commandment of the Decalogue [The Ten Commandments].  The scandal given to Catholics cannot be measured.  The Church is shaken to its very foundations.”[16]

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Sermon, Oct. 28, 1986: “John Paul II has encouraged false religions to pray to their false gods: it is an unprecedented and intolerable humiliation to those who remain Catholic…”[17]

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Meeting with “Cardinal” Ratzinger, July 14, 1987: “If there is a schism, it is because of what the Vatican did at Assisi… being excommunicated by a liberal, ecuмenical, and revolutionary Church is a matter of indifference to us.”[18]

     

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Meeting with “Cardinal” Ratzinger, July 14, 1987: “Rome has lost the Faith.  Rome is in apostasy.”[19]

     

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Aug. 29, 1987: “The See of Peter and the posts of authority in Rome being occupied by anti-Christs, the destruction of the Kingdom of our Lord is being rapidly carried out… This is what has brought down upon our heads persecution by the Rome of the anti-Christs.”[20]

     

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Declaration given to the Press before 1988 Episcopal Consecrations: “The Church holds all communion with false religions and heresy… in horror... To safeguard the Catholic priesthood which perpetuates the Church and not an adulterous Church, there must be Catholic bishops.”[21]

     

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Speaking of the leaders of the Vatican II sect: “We cannot work together with these enemies of our Lord’s reign.”[22]

     

    Archbishop Lefebvre, Speaking of the leaders of the Vatican II sect: “We cannot follow these people.  They’re in apostasy, they do not believe in the divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ who must reign.  What is the use in waiting?  Let’s do the consecration!”[23]

     


    Offline saintbosco13

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 647
    • Reputation: +201/-313
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #62 on: May 12, 2013, 02:01:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: saintbosco13


    We already reviewed the full list of teachings from the Church on baptism of desire and baptism of blood when we discussed them in the discussion titled, "Baptismofdesire.com". The quotes are all listed on the homepage there. My point above is that they need not be solemn decrees.



    You mean your "list" where every Father that you quoted, and St. Bernanrd, and Innocent II where shown to be errors, misrepresentions, and non-magisterial opinions like 10 times and you just go along repeating the same mantra?

    See  CI Thread under Church in Crisis entitled Fathers Rejected Even Explicit BOD of the Catechumen .



    Yes Bowler, we have already seen you condemn all of the Church Fathers, Popes, General Councils, Doctors of the Church, Saints, Catechisms, Canon Law, and other trusted Church references as quoted on baptismofdesire.com. As if you know better than all of them.

    Again, if any of those sources were presenting erroneous opinions, we would see objections from others in the Church after them. You've been asked several times for even a single example of this, but you have never replied.


    Offline saintbosco13

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 647
    • Reputation: +201/-313
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #63 on: May 12, 2013, 02:04:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie
    Quote from: saintbosco13


    We already reviewed the full list of teachings from the Church on baptism of desire and baptism of blood when we discussed them in the discussion titled, "Baptismofdesire.com". The quotes are all listed on the homepage there. My point above is that they need not be solemn decrees.




    That is a very fine webpage on the subject, may I mirror it from TraditionalCatholic.net ?


    By all means...

    Offline saintbosco13

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 647
    • Reputation: +201/-313
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #64 on: May 12, 2013, 02:06:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: saintbosco13
    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: saintbosco13


    You stated that Catholics only determine what truth is based on dogmatic decrees (which is why you started this discussion). My questions are:

    If dogmatic decrees are essential for Catholics to know what truth is,


    That is precisely why I don't bother answering you. Your mind is not wired right. What you wrote above is a strawman.

    How many times do I need to tell you to post my quotes, instead of MAKING UP what you wanted me to say!


    Earlier in this discussion, you stated:
    "A Catholic does not determine truth by what has not been condemned, but by what has been infallible [sic] declared."

    So my question in response is, if dogmatic decrees are essential for Catholics to know what truth is, why was very little infallibly declared by the Church before the Council of Trent? See my previous list of the first 18 Councils and what they defined.

    For example, we don't see any solemn declarations on Baptism until the 14th through 16th centuries. Why did the Catholic Church leave the first 13 generations of Catholics without any solemn definitions on baptism, if, as you say, infallible declarations are mandatory for Catholics to know what truth is?



    Bowler, I have quoted you word for word as you requested. Waiting for your answer...



    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-12
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #65 on: May 12, 2013, 05:10:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: ServusSpiritusSancti
    Quote from: Jehanne
    Are you a sede?  If so, your religion is one without an authority.  "He who hears you, hears me" (CCC, #87) does not have any meaning in your religion.


    That's rather ridiculous. Sedevacantism is Traditional Catholicism, not a separate religion. Sedes acknowledge Our Lord Jesus Christ as their authority.

    Also, the CCC is a joke.


    SB13 thinks that he can quote Magisterial texts supporting BoD as somehow abrogating the final opinion of Saint Augustine, which is what Father Feeney advocated.  But, SB13, cannot state publicly the Magisterial teachings refuting sedevacantism:

    Quote
    Pius, bishop, servant of the servants of God, with the approval of the sacred council, for an everlasting record.

    The Eternal Shepherd and Guardian of our souls {I Pet. 2:25}, in order to render the saving work of redemption lasting, decided to establish His holy Church that in it, as in the house of the living God, all the faithful might be held together by the bond of one faith and one love. For this reason, before He was glorified, He prayed to the Father not for the Apostles only, but for those also who would believe in him on their testimony, that all might be one as the Son and the Father are one {John 17:20}. Therefore, just as He sent the Apostles, whom He had chosen for Himself out of the world, as He Himself was sent by the Father {John 20:21}, so also He wished shepherds and teachers to be in His Church until the consummation of the world {Matt. 28:20}. Indeed, He placed St. Peter at the head of the other apostles that the episcopate might be one and undivided, and that the whole multitude of believers might be preserved in unity of faith and communion by means of a well-organized priesthood. He made Peter a perpetual principle of this two-fold unity and a visible foundation, that on his strength an everlasting temple might be erected and on the firmness of his faith a Church might arise whose pinnacle was to reach into heaven. But the gates of hell, with a hatred that grows greater each day, are rising up everywhere against its divinely established foundation with the intention of overthrowing the Church, if this were possible. We, therefore, judge it necessary for the protection, the safety, and the increase of the Catholic flock to pronounce with the approval of the sacred council the true doctrine concerning the establishment, the perpetuity, and the nature of the apostolic primacy. In this primacy, all the efficacy and all the strength of the Church are placed. (Pastor Aeternus, 1)


    Quote
    Therefore, if anyone says that the blessed Apostle Peter was not constituted by Christ the Lord as the Prince of all the Apostles and the visible head of the whole Church militant, or that he received immediately and directly from Jesus Christ our Lord only a primacy of honor and not a true and proper primacy of jurisdiction:  let him be anathema. (Pastor Aeternus, 1)


    Quote
    That which our Lord Jesus Christ, the prince of shepherds and great shepherd of the sheep, established in the Blessed Apostle Peter, for the continual salvation and permanent benefit of the Church, must of necessity remain for ever, by Christ's authority, in the church which, founded as it is upon a rock, will stand firm until the end of time {See Mt 7, 25; Lk 6, 48}. (Pastor Aeternus, 2)


    Quote
    For no one can be in doubt, indeed it was known in every age that the holy and most blessed Peter, prince and head of the apostles, the pillar of faith and the foundation of the catholic church, received the keys of the kingdom from our lord Jesus Christ, the saviour and redeemer of the human race, and that to this day and for ever he lives and presides and exercises judgment in his successors the bishops of the holy Roman see, which he founded and consecrated with his blood {From the speech of Philip, the Roman legate, at the 3rd session of the council of Ephesus (D no. 112)}. (Pastor Aeternus, 2)


    Quote
    Therefore whoever succeeds to the chair of Peter obtains by the institution of Christ himself, the primacy of Peter over the whole church. So what the truth has ordained stands firm, and blessed Peter perseveres in the rock-like strength he was granted, and does not abandon that guidance of the church which he once received {Leo 1, Serm. (Sermons), 3 (elsewhere 2), ch. 3 (PL 54, 146)}. (Pastor Aeternus, 2)


    Quote
    For this reason it has always been necessary for every church--that is to say the faithful throughout the world--to be in agreement with the Roman church because of its more effective leadership. In consequence of being joined, as members to head, with that see, from which the rights of sacred communion flow to all, they will grow together into the structure of a single body {Irenaeus, Adv. haeres. (Against Heresies) 1113 (PG 7, 849), Council of Aquilea (381), to be found among: Ambrose, Epistolae (Letters), 11 (PL 16, 946)}. (Pastor Aeternus, 2)


    Quote
    Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the Lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that Blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole Church; or that the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy: let him be anathema. (Pastor Aeternus, 2)

    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #66 on: May 12, 2013, 07:04:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: saintbosco13
    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: saintbosco13


    We already reviewed the full list of teachings from the Church on baptism of desire and baptism of blood when we discussed them in the discussion titled, "Baptismofdesire.com". The quotes are all listed on the homepage there. My point above is that they need not be solemn decrees.



    You mean your "list" where every Father that you quoted, and St. Bernanrd, and Innocent II where shown to be errors, misrepresentions, and non-magisterial opinions like 10 times and you just go along repeating the same mantra?

    See  CI Thread under Church in Crisis entitled Fathers Rejected Even Explicit BOD of the Catechumen .



    Yes Bowler, we have already seen you condemn all of the Church Fathers, Popes, General Councils, Doctors of the Church, Saints, Catechisms, Canon Law, and other trusted Church references as quoted on baptismofdesire.com. As if you know better than all of them.

    Again, if any of those sources were presenting erroneous opinions, we would see objections from others in the Church after them. You've been asked several times for even a single example of this, but you have never replied.



    There you go again with your lies.

    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #67 on: May 12, 2013, 07:16:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: saintbosco13
    Quote from: saintbosco13
    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: saintbosco13


    You stated that Catholics only determine what truth is based on dogmatic decrees (which is why you started this discussion). My questions are:

    If dogmatic decrees are essential for Catholics to know what truth is,


    That is precisely why I don't bother answering you. Your mind is not wired right. What you wrote above is a strawman.

    How many times do I need to tell you to post my quotes, instead of MAKING UP what you wanted me to say!


    Earlier in this discussion, you stated:
    "A Catholic does not determine truth by what has not been condemned, but by what has been infallible [sic] declared."

    So my question in response is, if dogmatic decrees are essential for Catholics to know what truth is, why was very little infallibly declared by the Church before the Council of Trent? See my previous list of the first 18 Councils and what they defined.

    For example, we don't see any solemn declarations on Baptism until the 14th through 16th centuries. Why did the Catholic Church leave the first 13 generations of Catholics without any solemn definitions on baptism, if, as you say, infallible declarations are mandatory for Catholics to know what truth is?



    Bowler, I have quoted you word for word as you requested. Waiting for your answer...



    I don't see the quote from me where I requested this.



    Offline saintbosco13

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 647
    • Reputation: +201/-313
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #68 on: May 12, 2013, 11:33:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: saintbosco13
    Quote from: saintbosco13
    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: saintbosco13


    You stated that Catholics only determine what truth is based on dogmatic decrees (which is why you started this discussion). My questions are:

    If dogmatic decrees are essential for Catholics to know what truth is,


    That is precisely why I don't bother answering you. Your mind is not wired right. What you wrote above is a strawman.

    How many times do I need to tell you to post my quotes, instead of MAKING UP what you wanted me to say!


    Earlier in this discussion, you stated:
    "A Catholic does not determine truth by what has not been condemned, but by what has been infallible [sic] declared."

    So my question in response is, if dogmatic decrees are essential for Catholics to know what truth is, why was very little infallibly declared by the Church before the Council of Trent? See my previous list of the first 18 Councils and what they defined.

    For example, we don't see any solemn declarations on Baptism until the 14th through 16th centuries. Why did the Catholic Church leave the first 13 generations of Catholics without any solemn definitions on baptism, if, as you say, infallible declarations are mandatory for Catholics to know what truth is?



    Bowler, I have quoted you word for word as you requested. Waiting for your answer...



    I don't see the quote from me where I requested this.



    No worries bowler, it's obvious why you wouldn't want to answer that question.


    Offline saintbosco13

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 647
    • Reputation: +201/-313
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #69 on: May 12, 2013, 11:38:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne


    SB13 thinks that he can quote Magisterial texts supporting BoD as somehow abrogating the final opinion of Saint Augustine, which is what Father Feeney advocated.  But, SB13, cannot state publicly the Magisterial teachings refuting sedevacantism:




    Another really random question Jehanne! This discussion is about BoD, not sedevacantism. If you want to discuss that, you should start another discussion. I will be happy to reply.


    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Why is BOD Left Out of All Dogmatic Decrees?
    « Reply #70 on: May 13, 2013, 01:26:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: saintbosco13
     
    Yes Bowler, we have already seen you condemn all of the Church Fathers, Popes, General Councils, Doctors of the Church, Saints, Catechisms, Canon Law, and other trusted Church references as quoted on baptismofdesire.com. As if you know better than all of them.

    Again, if any of those sources were presenting erroneous opinions, we would see objections from others in the Church after them. You've been asked several times for even a single example of this, but you have never replied.



    There you go again with your lies, subterfuge, and invented personal system of finding Catholic truth.

     

    1)saintbosco13 said: "we have already seen you condemn all of the Church Fathers".
    That's a blatant lie! I posted the clear quotes by St. John Chrysosotom, St. Ambrose, St. Augustine that the catechumen that dies unbaptized will not be saved. Nowhere did I condemn any Father.

    Ironically, it is actually you who condemn ALL of the Church Fathers, the Athanasian Creed, St. Thomas Aquinas, the Council of Trent, the Catechism of Trent (and much more) since you believe that a person with no desire to be baptized, martyred, or a Catholic, can be saved.

    2)saintbosco13 said:"we have already seen you condemn all Popes".

    You only posted a letter from Innocent III which I showed to be just his private opinion:
    Quote
    This obscure letter to a bishop has no magisterial authority whatsoever. If BOD was a doctrine, how come this is the only docuмent the author can come up with (one letter from 1206!)?

    Indeed Pope Innocent III had every chance to infallible define any other exceptions to the constant tradition in the Fathers that the Gospel message of "Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost he cannot enter into the kingdom of God" is to be taken absolutely. Yet he didn't mention any when he declared infallible:

    Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra:
    “There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which
    nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice.”


    It is actually you saintbosco13 who condemn all of the popes who made the clear dogmatic decrees that I follow exactly as they are clearly written:

    Quote
    Bowler said:
    1) I am an Augustinian with regard to baptism of desire. Here is short is what I believe:

    St. Augustine:   “If you wish to be a Catholic, do not venture to believe, to say, or to teach that they whom the Lord has predestinated for baptism can be snatched away from his predestination, or die before that has been accomplished in them which the Almighty has predestined.’ There is in such a dogma more power than I can tell assigned to chances in opposition to the power of God, by the occurrence of which casualties that which He has predestinated is not permitted to come to pass. It is hardly necessary to spend time or earnest words in cautioning the man who takes up with this error against the absolute vortex of confusion into which it will absorb him, when I shall sufficiently meet the case if I briefly warn the prudent man who is ready to receive correction against the threatening mischief.” (On the Soul and Its Origin 3, 13)


    Therefore, I believe in EENS as it is written. What St. Augustine taught is exactly inline with the dogmatic decrees on EENS. I don't need to add any "qualifiers" to what the popes and councils have defined dogmatically to this present day.


    What is EENS as it is written?

    EENS (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus) translates to  Outside of the Church there is no salvation. EENS as it is written means that we believe the dogmatic decrees on EENS exactly as the words say.



    Excerpts of the Nine Dogmatic Decrees that all agree with St. Augustine


    Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra:
    “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire ..and that nobody can be saved, … even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ[/b], unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”

    Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: “There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, …

    Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra:
    “… this Church outside of which there is no salvation nor remission of sin… Furthermore, … every human creature that they by absolute necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff.”

    Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, Decree # 30, 1311-1312, ex cathedra:
    “… one universal Church, outside of which there is no salvation, for all of whom there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism…”

    Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra:
    “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.”
     
    Pope Leo X, Fifth Lateran Council, Session 11, Dec. 19, 1516, ex cathedra:
    “For, regulars and seculars, prelates and subjects, exempt and non-exempt, belong to the one universal Church, outside of which no one at all is saved, and they all have one Lord and one faith.”

    Pope Pius IV, Council of Trent, Iniunctum nobis, Nov. 13, 1565, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which no one can be saved… I now profess and truly hold…”

    Pope Benedict XIV, Nuper ad nos, March 16, 1743, Profession of Faith: “This faith of the Catholic Church, without which no one can be saved, and which of my own accord I now profess and truly hold…”

    Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, Session 2, Profession of Faith, 1870, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold…”

    Council of Trent. Seventh Session. March, 1547. Decree on the Sacraments.
    On Baptism

    Canon 2. If anyone shall say that real and natural water is not necessary for baptism, and on that account those words of our Lord Jesus Christ: "Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God (John 3:5), are distorted into some metaphor: let him be anathema.

    Canon 5. If any one saith, that baptism is optional, that is, not necessary unto salvation; let him be anathema


    Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis (# 22), June 29, 1943: “Actually only those are to be numbered among the members of the Church who have received the laver of regeneration and profess the true faith.”

    Pope Pius XII, Mediator Dei (# 43), Nov. 20, 1947: “In the same
    way, actually that baptism is the distinctive mark of all
    Christians, and serves to differentiate them from those who
    have not been cleansed in this purifying stream and
    consequently are not members of Christ
    , the sacrament of holy
    orders sets the priest apart from the rest of the faithful who
    have not received this consecration.”


    What those dogmatic Decrees Mean

    From: Who Shall Ascend, by Fr. Walthen

    Being ex cathedra definitions, they must be taken literally, unequivocally, and absolutely. Hence, to attempt to modify or qualify them in any way is to deny them.

    3. The doctrine says clearly that only Catholics go to Heaven; all others are lost, that is, they do not go to Heaven, but to Hell. All who are inclined to dispute this dogma should have the good sense to realize that if this is not what the words of the definitions mean, the Church would never have promulgated such a position. To give any other meaning to these words is to portray the Church as foolish and ridiculous.

    4. The pronouncements indicate that, by divine decree, those only will be saved who are members of the Church when they die. This membership must be formal, real, explicit, and, in those of the (mental) age of reason, deliberate. There is no such thing as "potential" membership in the Church, or "implicit" membership, or "quasi-membership," or "invisible membership," or anything of the kind. Neither can those who are catechumens, that is, those who are preparing to enter the Church, be considered members.

    12. Let the reader accept the reasonable fact that the Pontiffs who pronounced these decrees were perfectly literate and fully cognizant of what they were saying. If there were any need to soften or qualify their meanings, they were quite capable of doing so. They were not regarded as heretics or fanatics at the time of their pronouncements, and have never been labeled such by the Church to this very day. It is an easy thing for the people of this "enlightened" age to fall into the modern delusion that the men of former times, especially those of the Middle Ages, were not as bright as we are, so that they sometimes said they knew not what.

    13. The dates of these definitions are extremely important. They mark the time when the Church terminated speculation and discussion among theologians on the subject of the conditions of salvation. All writings on this subject, therefore, which predate these definitions have value only in so far as they corroborate these definitions.




    While we are at it, here is an additional list of decrees from popes that you condemn in your believing that a person with no desire to be baptized, martyred, or a Catholic, can be saved:

    More Popes on Outside the Church There is No Salvation. Notice the years and years of popes that I quote, and NEVER one mentions exceptions that save. Every quote says unequivocally that no one is saved:

    The teaching of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium consists of those doctrines which Popes, by their common and universal teaching, propose to be believed as divinely revealed. The teaching of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium can never contradict the teaching of the Chair of Peter (the dogmatic definitions), of course, since both are infallible.  Thus, the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium does not actually have to be considered at all in regard to Outside the Church There is No Salvation, because this dogma has been defined from the Chair of Peter and nothing in the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium can possibly contradict the Chair of Peter.  So beware of those people who try to find ways to deny the Church’s dogmatic teaching on Outside the Church There is No Salvation by calling statements which contradict this dogma, part of the “Ordinary and Universal Magisterium,” when they can't be.  
           
    The following quotations from many Popes are reaffirmations of the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation.  These teachings of the Popes are part of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium – and are therefore infallible – since they reiterate the teaching of the Chair of St. Peter on the Catholic dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation.
     
    Pope St. Gregory the Great, quoted in Summo Iugiter Studio, 590-604:
    “The holy universal Church teaches that it is not possible to worship God truly except in her and asserts that all who are outside of her will not be saved.”

    Pope Innocent III, Eius exemplo, Dec. 18, 1208:
    “By the heart we believe and by the mouth we confess the one Church, not of heretics, but the Holy Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Church outside of which we believe that no one is saved.”

    Pope Clement VI, Super quibusdam, Sept. 20, 1351:
    “In the second place, we ask whether you and the Armenians obedient to you believe that no man of the wayfarers outside the faith of this Church, and outside the obedience to the Pope of Rome, can finally be saved.”

    Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum (# 14), May 5, 1824:
    “It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects who profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members… by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism… This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.”

    Pope Leo XII, Quod hoc ineunte (# 8), May 24, 1824: “We address all of you who are still removed from the true Church and the road to salvation.  In this universal rejoicing, one thing is lacking: that having been called by the inspiration of the Heavenly Spirit and having broken every decisive snare, you might sincerely agree with the mother Church, outside of whose teachings there is no salvation.”

    Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos (# 13), Aug. 15, 1832:  “With the admonition of the apostle, that ‘there is one God, one faith, one baptism’ (Eph. 4:5), may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever.  They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that ‘those who are not with Christ are against Him,’ (Lk. 11:23) and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him.  Therefore, ‘without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate (Athanasian Creed).”

    Pope Gregory XVI, Summo Iugiter Studio (# 2), May 27, 1832:
    “Finally some of these misguided people attempt to persuade themselves and others that men are not saved only in the Catholic religion, but that even heretics may attain eternal life.

    Pope Pius IX, Ubi primum (# 10), June 17, 1847: “For ‘there is one universal Church outside of which no one at all is saved; it contains regular and secular prelates along with those under their jurisdiction, who all profess one Lord, one faith and one baptism.”

    Pope Pius IX, Nostis et Nobiscuм (# 10), Dec. 8, 1849: “In particular, ensure that the faithful are deeply and thoroughly convinced of the truth of the doctrine that the Catholic faith is necessary for attaining salvation. (This doctrine, received from Christ and emphasized by the Fathers and Councils, is also contained in the formulae of the profession of faith used by Latin, Greek and Oriental Catholics).”

    Pope Pius IX, Syllabus of Modern Errors, Dec. 8, 1864 - Proposition 16: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation.” – Condemned

    Pope Leo XIII, Tametsi futura prospicientibus (# 7), Nov. 1, 1900:  “Christ is man’s ‘Way’; the Church also is his ‘Way’… Hence all who would find salvation apart from the Church, are led astray and strive in vain.”

    Pope St. Pius X, Iucunda sane (# 9), March 12, 1904: “Yet at the same time We cannot but remind all, great and small, as Pope St. Gregory did, of the absolute necessity of having recourse to this Church in order to have eternal salvation…”

    Pope St. Pius X, Editae saepe (# 29), May 26, 1910: “The Church alone possesses together with her magisterium the power of governing and sanctifying human society.  Through her ministers and servants (each in his own station and office), she confers on mankind suitable and necessary means of salvation.”

    Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 11), Jan. 6, 1928:  “The Catholic Church is alone in keeping the true worship.  This is the fount of truth, this is the house of faith, this is the temple of God: if any man enter not here, or if any man go forth from it, he is a stranger to the hope of life and salvation.”