Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?  (Read 9846 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 46600
  • Reputation: +27440/-5070
  • Gender: Male
Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
« Reply #45 on: July 31, 2014, 08:58:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    Nonsense. The Council of Trent specified the three Sacraments. Does the Council say Holy Orders can be received by desire??? Please post the evidence as I have for Baptism, Penance and Holy Communion. Do you believe in Matrimony of desire??? The Church is in need of that Sacrament as well. Trent was not talking about what the Church needs as a whole. Trent was speaking of individuals. That why the canon reads "not necessary for every individual" as opposed to "not necessary for the Church."


    Then say what you mean and stop speaking gibberish.  You stated as a matter or principle that the Sacraments must all be receivable in the same manner (i.e. by desire).  You HAVE no evidence that Baptism can be received by desire, just your misreading of the Council of Trent.

    Quote
    "Without the laver of regeneration or the desire thereof" Council of Trent: Decree on Justification (Session 6, Chapter 4)


    You can color the passage all you want.  Trent is not teaching BoD here.  We've gone through this a bzillion times.

    Just as the character conferred by the Sacrament of Holy Orders is essential to the grace of the Sacrament, so too with the other character Sacraments.  Consequently, the character Sacraments cannot be received by "desire".


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46600
    • Reputation: +27440/-5070
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #46 on: July 31, 2014, 09:14:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    You keep going back to the same argument. And I repeat again that the Church does not contradict herself, when she says explicitly that the Sacraments necessary for salvation can be received by desire and even goes as far as to point them out individually![/b]


    You can repeat it all you want.  You are suffering from a lapse in logic.  That's why in all scholastic philosophy and theology curricula, Logic 101 is the prerequisite course.  It's dangerous to attempt philosophy or theology without a solid grounding in logic.

    Trent is teaching that the Sacraments in general are necessary for salvation and that some of them (at least) can be received by desire.  Trent is not teaching, as you would have it, that all the Sacraments that are necessary for salvation are receivable by desire.  It's pretty simple, but you don't see it because you don't want to see it.


    Offline Ad Jesum per Mariam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 259
    • Reputation: +32/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #47 on: July 31, 2014, 09:23:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Canon Law does not teach or define BoD but tolerates the opinion and, contrary to earlier Church practices, for pastoral reasons allows Christian burial for catechumens, based on the possibility that they might be saved.  It's well established that the Church tolerates the opinion of BoD.

    But the time has come for the Church to put the clamps down on the heretical application of BoD to non-Catholics.  BoD has been the wedge by which all of Catholic dogma was eventually overturned by the enemies of the Church.


    The Church tolerates or teaches??? The Church would not teach a "heretical opinion" that would lead to the direct loss of souls in her Catechisms and Canon Law, and they certainly wouldn't define it in an Ecuмenical Council (which they clearly did at Trent). If this isn't enough, throughout the centuries her greatest doctors have taught baptism of desire (Cyprian, Tertullian, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Augustine, Bonaventure, Aquinas, Bellarmine, Liguori). You are countering a heretical application of baptism of desire with your own heresy.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46600
    • Reputation: +27440/-5070
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #48 on: July 31, 2014, 09:28:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    [The Church would not teach a "heretical opinion"


    I have never stated the BoD, as classically understood, is "heretical".  It's an opinion rooted in speculative theology that the Church has tolerated.  Problem is when BoD gets extended to undermine EENS and the necessity of the Sacraments for salvation.

    99% of BoDers end up in heresy when they explain BoD by extending it to those who do not have Catholic faith or by claiming that such as these are saved WITHOUT the Sacrament of Baptism.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46600
    • Reputation: +27440/-5070
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #49 on: July 31, 2014, 09:33:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    If this isn't enough, throughout the centuries her greatest doctors have taught baptism of desire (Cyprian, Tertullian, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Augustine, Bonaventure, Aquinas, Bellarmine, Liguori). You are countering a heretical application of baptism of desire with your own heresy.


    That's another BoDer lie.  Cyprian, Tertullian, and Chrysostom taught BoB but explicitly REJECTED BoD.  St. Augustine is the ONLY Church Father who TENTATIVELY (read his language) floated the idea of BoD but then retracted it and issued some of the strongest anti-BoD statements in existence.  Aquinas picked it up from Augustine, and then everyone else from Aquinas.  And because of the adoption by Aquinas it became an extremely widespread opinion.  But this does not change the fact that there's no evidence for this being revealed truth nor that it's definable as dogma.

    I personally reject this opinion.  I see there to be much more evidence against it than for it.  But if someone wanted to hold it, I have no problem with that ... PROVIDED THAT IN THE PROCESS THEY DO NOT REJECT OTHER CATHOLIC DOGMAS.  99% of BoDers hide behind Aquinas and Bellarmine but then articulate BoD in a way that undermines EENS and the dogmatic teaching of Trent.

    THAT is my problem.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46600
    • Reputation: +27440/-5070
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #50 on: July 31, 2014, 09:34:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If you want to hold that a couple dozen or so catechumens throughout history who got killed suddenly before their Baptism date could be saved, then more power to you.  Don't try to tell me, however, that non-Catholics can be saved by means of some desire implicit in trying to be a good guy.

    Offline Ad Jesum per Mariam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 259
    • Reputation: +32/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #51 on: July 31, 2014, 09:34:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    You keep going back to the same argument. And I repeat again that the Church does not contradict herself, when she says explicitly that the Sacraments necessary for salvation can be received by desire and even goes as far as to point them out individually![/b]


    You can repeat it all you want.  You are suffering from a lapse in logic.  That's why in all scholastic philosophy and theology curricula, Logic 101 is the prerequisite course.  It's dangerous to attempt philosophy or theology without a solid grounding in logic.

    Trent is teaching that the Sacraments in general are necessary for salvation and that some of them (at least) can be received by desire. Trent is not teaching, as you would have it, that all the Sacraments that are necessary for salvation are receivable by desire. It's pretty simple, but you don't see it because you don't want to see it.


    The Council of Trent:

    1) Baptism: Without the laver of regeneration or the desire thereof.

    2) Penance: Either by the sacrament, or by the desire of the sacrament.

    3) Holy Communion: those to wit, who eating in desire.

    All three sacraments necessary to salvation: Without them or without the desire thereof.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46600
    • Reputation: +27440/-5070
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #52 on: July 31, 2014, 09:37:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    1) Baptism: Without the laver of regeneration or the desire thereof.


    WRONG.  But if you want to believe that go ahead.  I honestly don't care.

    Let's get to the core of the problem, shall we?

    Do you believe that BoD applies only to catechumens who have embraced the Catholic Faith and intend to be Baptized and are lacking nothing but the Sacrament itself for justification?


    Offline Ad Jesum per Mariam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 259
    • Reputation: +32/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #53 on: July 31, 2014, 09:58:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    If you want to hold that a couple dozen or so catechumens throughout history who got killed suddenly before their Baptism date could be saved, then more power to you.  Don't try to tell me, however, that non-Catholics can be saved by means of some desire implicit in trying to be a good guy.


    I never said anything about non-Catholics. You are not following the thread very well, and you are putting words in my mouth. I am talking about those who desire to be Catholic (only). You are overreacting to the abuse of Roman Catholic Church teaching on baptism of desire, by the Novus Ordo "church". Also, each soul is no less important to the Church than to Christ Himself, who will go to the utmost lengths to find a lost sheep and bring him safely home. That there could even be a possibility that the Roman Catholic Church (the Pillar and Ground of the Truth) could lose "a couple of dozen souls" (as you nonchalantly put it) due to her own teaching is to put it plainly: RIDICULOUS and UN-CATHOLIC.

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #54 on: July 31, 2014, 10:14:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    If this isn't enough, throughout the centuries her greatest doctors have taught baptism of desire (Cyprian, Tertullian, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Augustine, Bonaventure, Aquinas, Bellarmine, Liguori). You are countering a heretical application of baptism of desire with your own heresy.


    That's another BoDer lie.  Cyprian, Tertullian, and Chrysostom taught BoB but explicitly REJECTED BoD.  St. Augustine is the ONLY Church Father who TENTATIVELY (read his language) floated the idea of BoD but then retracted it and issued some of the strongest anti-BoD statements in existence.  Aquinas picked it up from Augustine, and then everyone else from Aquinas.  And because of the adoption by Aquinas it became an extremely widespread opinion.  But this does not change the fact that there's no evidence for this being revealed truth nor that it's definable as dogma.


    No Father of the Church taught anything about saving efficacy of a Baptism of "desire". St Augustine was the only one to speculate specifically about the saving efficacy of BOD and there is proof that even he himself changed his earlier position on this subject in the anti-Pelagian writings, to say that even catechumens are damned if they are not baptized before death.
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #55 on: July 31, 2014, 10:25:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    If this isn't enough, throughout the centuries her greatest doctors have taught baptism of desire (Cyprian, Tertullian, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Augustine, Bonaventure, Aquinas, Bellarmine, Liguori). You are countering a heretical application of baptism of desire with your own heresy.


    That's another BoDer lie.  Cyprian, Tertullian, and Chrysostom taught BoB but explicitly REJECTED BoD.  St. Augustine is the ONLY Church Father who TENTATIVELY (read his language) floated the idea of BoD but then retracted it and issued some of the strongest anti-BoD statements in existence.  Aquinas picked it up from Augustine, and then everyone else from Aquinas.  And because of the adoption by Aquinas it became an extremely widespread opinion.  But this does not change the fact that there's no evidence for this being revealed truth nor that it's definable as dogma.


    No Father of the Church taught anything about saving efficacy of a Baptism of "desire". St Augustine was the only one to speculate specifically about the saving efficacy of BOD and there is proof that even he himself changed his earlier position on this subject in the anti-Pelagian writings, to say that even catechumens are damned if they are not baptized before death.


    Quote from: St. Augustine

    "How many rascals are saved by being baptized on their deathbeds? And how many sincere catechumens die unbaptized, and are thus lost forever!
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline Ad Jesum per Mariam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 259
    • Reputation: +32/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #56 on: July 31, 2014, 10:29:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    1) Baptism: Without the laver of regeneration or the desire thereof.


    WRONG.  But if you want to believe that go ahead.  I honestly don't care.

    Let's get to the core of the problem, shall we?

    Do you believe that BoD applies only to catechumens who have embraced the Catholic Faith and intend to be Baptized and are lacking nothing but the Sacrament itself for justification?


    Wrong???? Why because you say so? That is the core of the problem. You are rejecting and/or twisting a plain statement from a Roman Catholic Council. The teaching of Trent on baptism of desire is centered on anyone who desires the Roman Catholic faith (only). "The faith the catechumens beg for" (the Roman Catholic Faith). This is what is defined by Trent in regards to baptism of desire (and is de fide). I would have to believe that this would extend to anyone desiring the Roman Catholic Faith "only" (provided he has explicit belief in the Trinity and Incarnation) regardless of whether or not he was "officially" a catechumen. If a person dies without water baptism he must also have perfect contrition for sins to merit eternal life.

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #57 on: July 31, 2014, 10:31:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    If you want to hold that a couple dozen or so catechumens throughout history who got killed suddenly before their Baptism date could be saved, then more power to you.  Don't try to tell me, however, that non-Catholics can be saved by means of some desire implicit in trying to be a good guy.


    I never said anything about non-Catholics. You are not following the thread very well, and you are putting words in my mouth. I am talking about those who desire to be Catholic (only).


    Here lies the problem. The description here is no more about "Baptism of Desire". It is about "Faith of Desire", and is completely wrong because the Catholic Faith is the foundation of all justification.

    According to Trent (On justification, Chapter 6) in adults, for Baptism to be fruitful is necessary that:

     . Have belief in what has been divinely revealed (Catholic Faith)
     . Have true contrition for past sins
     . A sincere resolve to sin no more
     . Hope in the mercy of God
     . Love for God and hatred for sins
     . Resolve to receive Baptism , begin a new life in Christ, and keep God's commandments.

    If BOD were possible at all, it would be strictly applied to catechumens only that already hold the Catholic Faith and are in the point of death.
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46600
    • Reputation: +27440/-5070
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #58 on: July 31, 2014, 10:36:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    1) Baptism: Without the laver of regeneration or the desire thereof.


    WRONG.  But if you want to believe that go ahead.  I honestly don't care.

    Let's get to the core of the problem, shall we?

    Do you believe that BoD applies only to catechumens who have embraced the Catholic Faith and intend to be Baptized and are lacking nothing but the Sacrament itself for justification?


    Wrong???? Why because you say so?


    No, because I don't feel like explaining the reasons for this again.  I've done it about a dozen times on various threads.  Consequently, I decided to pass on the point and "concede" it for the sake of argument.

    Quote
    That is the core of the problem. You are rejecting and/or twisting a plain statement from a Roman Catholic Council. The teaching of Trent on baptism of desire is centered on anyone who desires the Roman Catholic faith (only). "The faith the catechumens beg for" (the Roman Catholic Faith). This is what is defined by Trent in regards to baptism of desire (and is de fide). I would have to believe that this would extend to anyone desiring the Roman Catholic Faith "only" (provided he has explicit belief in the Trinity and Incarnation) regardless of whether or not he was "officially" a catechumen. If a person dies without water baptism he must also have perfect contrition for sins to merit eternal life.


    So if you restrict BoD to catechumens (or catechumen-like people) who have explicit belief, with the formal motive of faith, in the Holy Trinity and Incarnation at mininum and who have the resolve to be baptized (along with the other requisite dispositions), then I have no problem with you.  Go in peace.  I've repeatedly said that it's not worth my time to argue about this kind of BoD.

    Of course, I've heard people SAY that before but then immediately begin to backtrack.

    Do you consider Bishop Fellay's statement that the "Hindu in Tibet" could be saved to be erroneous and even possibly heretical?

    Offline Ad Jesum per Mariam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 259
    • Reputation: +32/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Which Sacraments are Necessary Unto Salvation?
    « Reply #59 on: July 31, 2014, 10:45:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella
    Quote from: Cantarella
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Ad Jesum per Mariam
    If this isn't enough, throughout the centuries her greatest doctors have taught baptism of desire (Cyprian, Tertullian, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Augustine, Bonaventure, Aquinas, Bellarmine, Liguori). You are countering a heretical application of baptism of desire with your own heresy.


    That's another BoDer lie.  Cyprian, Tertullian, and Chrysostom taught BoB but explicitly REJECTED BoD.  St. Augustine is the ONLY Church Father who TENTATIVELY (read his language) floated the idea of BoD but then retracted it and issued some of the strongest anti-BoD statements in existence.  Aquinas picked it up from Augustine, and then everyone else from Aquinas.  And because of the adoption by Aquinas it became an extremely widespread opinion.  But this does not change the fact that there's no evidence for this being revealed truth nor that it's definable as dogma.


    No Father of the Church taught anything about saving efficacy of a Baptism of "desire". St Augustine was the only one to speculate specifically about the saving efficacy of BOD and there is proof that even he himself changed his earlier position on this subject in the anti-Pelagian writings, to say that even catechumens are damned if they are not baptized before death.


    Quote from: St. Augustine

    "How many rascals are saved by being baptized on their deathbeds? And how many sincere catechumens die unbaptized, and are thus lost forever!


    Unfortunately one supposed quote from one doctor who changed his mind does not make a case for you. This is called selective quoting, and is a tactic of heretics. Here is just a list of some of the doctors (including St. Augustine) who taught that one can be saved through desire of baptism along with Popes and Catechisms who taught the same...

    Church Father Cyprian (3rd Century): The Epistles of Cyprian, Epistle LXXII: "Let men of this kind, who are aiders and favourers of heretics, know therefore, first, that those catechumens hold the sound faith and truth of the Church, and advance from the divine camp to do battle with the devil, with a full and sincere acknowledgment of God the Father, and of Christ, and of the Holy Ghost; then, that they certainly are not deprived of the sacrament of baptism who are baptized with the most glorious and greatest baptism of blood".

    To Jubaianus, Concerning the Baptism of Heretics: "Let men of this kind, who are aiders and favourers of heretics, know therefore, first, that those catechumens hold the sound faith and truth of the Church, and advance from the divine camp to do battle with the devil, with a full and sincere acknowledgment of God the Father, and of Christ, and of the Holy Ghost; then, that they certainly are not deprived of the sacrament of baptism who are baptized with the most glorious and greatest baptism of blood, concerning which the Lord also said, that He had "another baptism to be baptized with."
    Church Father Tertullian (3rd Century): Enchiridion Patristicuм under "de baptisme”: "In truth we also have a second laver which is the same as the first, namely that of blood, concerning which Our Lord said, "And I have a baptism wherewith I am to be baptized' (Luke 12:50) after He had already been baptized; for He came by water and blood as John wrote, that He might be baptized by water and glorified by blood, likewise too that He might make us called by water and chosen by blood; He poured forth these two baptisms from the wound dug in His side so that those who believed in His blood might be cleansed by water and those who were cleansed by water might bear His blood; this is the baptism which takes the place of the laver which has not been received and restores what was lost."
    St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Doctor of the Church (4th Century): Enchiridion Patristicuм: "If anyone does not receive baptism, he does not have salvation, excepting only martyrs who gain the kingdom even without water."
    • St. John Chrystostome, Doctor of the Church (4th Century): Panegyric on St. Lucianus,"Do not be surprised that I should equate martyrdom with baptism; for here too the spirit blows with much fruitfulness, and a marvellous and astonishing remission of sins and cleansing of the soul is effected; and just as those who are baptized by water, so, too, those who suffer martyrdom are cleansed with their own blood."
    St. Ambrose, Doctor of the Church (4th Century): From his writing "De obitu Valentiniani consolatio": "But I hear that you are distressed because he did not receive the sacrament of baptism. Tell me, what attribute do we have besides our will, our intention? Yet, a short time ago he had this desire that before he came to Italy he should be initiated [baptized], and he indicated that he wanted to be baptized as soon as possible by myself. Did he not, therefore, have that grace which he desired? Did he not have what he asked for? Undoubtedly because he asked for it he received it."
    St. Augustine, Doctor of the Church (5th Century): From City of God, Book XIII, Chapter 7: "Of the Death Which the Unbaptized Suffer for the Confession of Christ: For whatever unbaptized persons die confessing Christ, this confession is of the same efficacy for the remission of sins as if they were washed in the sacred font of baptism. For He who said, "Unless a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God," John 3:5 made also an exception in their favor, in that other sentence where He no less absolutely said, "Whosoever shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven;" Matthew 10:32 and in another place, "Whosoever will lose his life for my sake, shall find it." Matthew 16:25"
    Pope Innocent II (12th Century): From his letter "Apostolicam Sedem" to the Bishop of Cremona, "We assert without hesitation (on the authority of the holy Fathers Augustine and Ambrose) that the 'priest' whom you indicated (in your letter) had died without the water of baptism, because he persevered in the Faith of Holy Mother Church and in the confession of the name of Christ, was freed from original sin and attained the joys of the heavenly fatherland. Read [brother] in the eighth book of Augustine's City of God where among other things it is written: 'Baptism is administered invisibly to one whom not contempt of religion, but death excludes.' Read again the book also of the blessed Ambrose concerning the death of Valentinian where he says the same thing. Therefore, to questions concerning the dead, you should hold the opinions of the learned Fathers, and in your church you should join in prayers and you should have sacrifices offered to God for the 'priest' mentioned." (Denzinger 388)
    St. Bonaventure, Doctor of the Church (13th century): In Sent. IV, d.4,P.2,a.I,q.I: “God obliges no one to do the impossible and therefore it must be admitted that the baptism of desire without the baptism of water is sufficient, provided the person in question has the will to receive the baptism of water, but is prevented from doing so before he dies."
    St. Thomas Aquinas, Doctor of the Church (13th century): Summa Theologica, Whether there are two ways to be distinguished of eating Christ's body?
    “Consequently, just as some are baptized with the Baptism of desire, through their desire of baptism, before being baptized in the Baptism of water; so likewise some eat this sacrament spiritually ere they receive it sacramentally.”

    Whether a man can be saved without Baptism?
    “Secondly, the sacrament of Baptism may be wanting to anyone in reality but not in desire: for instance, when a man wishes to be baptized, but by some ill-chance he is forestalled by death before receiving Baptism. And such a man can obtain salvation without being actually baptized, on account of his desire for Baptism, which desire is the outcome of "faith that worketh by charity," whereby God, Whose power is not tied to visible sacraments, sanctifies man inwardly. Hence Ambrose says of Valentinian, who died while yet a catechumen: "I lost him whom I was to regenerate: but he did not lose the grace he prayed for."

    Whether grace and virtues are bestowed on man by Baptism?
    Reply to Objection 2. As stated above (1, ad 2; 68, 2) man receives the forgiveness of sins before Baptism in so far as he has Baptism of desire, explicitly or implicitly; and yet when he actually receives Baptism, he receives a fuller remission, as to the remission of the entire punishment. So also before Baptism Cornelius and others like him receive grace and virtues through their faith in Christ and their desire for Baptism, implicit or explicit: but afterwards when baptized, they receive a yet greater fulness of grace and virtues. Hence in Ps. 22:2, "He hath brought me up on the water of refreshment," a gloss says: "He has brought us up by an increase of virtue and good deeds in Baptism."
    St. Catherine of Sienna (14th Century): Dialogue of St. Catherine: Baptisms: "I wished thee to see the secret of the Heart, showing it to thee open, so that you mightest see how much more I loved than I could show thee by finite pain. I poured from it Blood and Water, to show thee the baptism of water which is received in virtue of the Blood. I also showed the baptism of love in two ways, first in those who are baptized in their blood shed for Me which has virtue through My Blood, even if they have not been able to have Holy Baptism, and also those who are baptized in fire, not being able to have Holy Baptism, but desiring it with the affection of love. There is no baptism of desire without the Blood, because Blood is steeped in and kneaded with the fire of Divine charity, because through love was it shed. There is yet another way by which the soul receives the baptism of Blood, speaking, as it were, under a figure, and this way the Divine charity provided, knowing the infirmity and fragility of an, through which he offends, not that he is obliged, through his fragility and infirmity, to commit sin, unless he wish to do so; by falling, as he will, into the guild of mortal sin, by which he loses the grace which he drew from Holy Baptism in virtue of the Blood, it was necessary to leave a continual baptism of blood. This the Divine charity provided in the Sacrament of Holy Confession, the soul receiving the Baptism of blood, with contrition of heart, confessing, when able, to My ministers, who hold the keys of the Blood, sprinkling It, in absolution, upon the face of the soul. But if the soul is unable to confess, contrition of heart is sufficient for this baptism, the hand of My clemency giving you the fruit of this precious Blood... Thou seest then that these Baptisms, which you should all receive until the last moment, are continual, and though My works, that is the pains of the Cross were finite, the fruit of them which you receive in Baptism, through Me, are infinite..."
    St. Robert Bellarmine, Doctor of the Church (16th century): De Sacramento Baptismi, cap. 6: “...among the ancients this proposition was not so certain at first as later on: that perfect conversion and repentance is rightly called the Baptism of Desire and supplies for Baptism of water, at least in case of necessity”....."it is certainly to be believed that true conversion supplies for Baptism of water when it is not from contempt but through necessity that persons die without Baptism of water.”

    The Church Militant (De Ecclesia Militante), c. 3: "I answer therefore that, when it is said outside the Church no one is saved, it must be understood of those who belong to her neither in actual fact nor in desire [desiderio], as theologians commonly speak on baptism. Because the catechumens are in the Church, though not in actual fact, yet at least in resolution [voto], therefore they can be saved."

    The Church Militant (De Ecclesia Militante), c. 2: "Others, however, are of the soul but not of the body (of the Church), as Catechumens and those who have been excommunicated, who may have faith and charity which is possible."
    Council of Trent (16th century): Decree on Justification (Session 6, Chapter 4): And this translation, since the promulgation of the Gospel, cannot be effected, without the laver of regeneration, or the desire thereof, as it is written; unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God.
    Catechism of the Council of Trent (16th century): "....should any unforeseen accident deprive adults of baptism, their intention of receiving it, and their repentance for past sins, will avail them to grace and righteousness." [section on baptism]
    The Douay Catechism (17th century): "Q. 610. Can a man be saved without baptism? A. He cannot, unless he have it either actual or in desire, with contrition, or to be baptized in his blood as the holy Innocents were, which suffered for Christ."
    St. Alphonsus Ligouri, Doctor of the Church (18th century): Moral Theology Manual, Bk. 6, no. 95, Concerning Baptism: "Baptism of desire is perfect conversion to God by contrition or love of God above all things accompanied by an explicit or implicit desire for true baptism of water, the place of which it takes as to the remission of guilt, but not as to the impression of the [baptismal] character or as to the removal of all debt of punishment. It is called "of wind" ["flaminis"] because it takes place by the impulse of the Holy Ghost who is called a wind ["flamen"]. Now it is "de fide" that men are also saved by Baptism of desire, by virtue of the Canon Apostolicam, "de presbytero non baptizato" and of the Council of Trent, session 6, Chapter 4 where it is said that no one can be saved 'without the laver of regeneration or the desire for it.'"

    St. Alphonsus Liguori on the Council of Trent, 1846, Pg. 128-129 (Duffy): "Who can deny that the act of perfect love of God, which is sufficient for justification, includes an implicit desire of Baptism, of Penance, and of the Eucharist. He who wishes the whole wishes the every part of that whole and all the means necessary for its attainment. In order to be justified without baptism, an infidel must love God above all things, and must have an universal will to observe all the divine precepts, among which the first is to receive baptism: and therefore in order to be justified it is necessary for him to have at least an implicit desire of that sacrament."
    Pope Pius IX (19th century): Quanto Conficiamur Moerore, 1863: “There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments.”
    Baltimore Catechism (19th and 20th centuries): Q. 653. Is Baptism of desire or of blood sufficient to produce the effects of Baptism of water? A. Baptism of desire or of blood is sufficient to produce the effects of the Baptism of water, if it is impossible to receive the Baptism of water.

    Q. 512. How are such persons said to belong to the Church? A. Such persons are said to belong to the "soul of the church"; that is, they are really members of the Church without knowing it. Those who share in its Sacraments and worship are said to belong to the body or visible part of the Church.

    [Note: The Baltimore Catechism was issued by the Third Council of Baltimore in 1884, and was approved by Pope Leo XIII in 1885 as the standard for Catholic schools in the United States, where it remained the standard for nearly a century. Even after extreme scrutiny and corrections after being published, the content on the threefold baptism has remained in the catechism to this day.]
    St. Pope Pius X (early 20th century): Catechism of Christian Doctrine (Catechism of St. Pius X):

    The Church in Particular: 29 Q. But if a man through no fault of his own is outside the Church, can he be saved? A. If he is outside the Church through no fault of his, that is, if he is in good faith, and if he has received Baptism, or at least has the implicit desire of Baptism; and if, moreover, he sincerely seeks the truth and does God's will as best he can such a man is indeed separated from the body of the Church, but is united to the soul of the Church and consequently is on the way of salvation

    Necessity of Baptism and Obligations of the Baptized: 17 Q. Can the absence of Baptism be supplied in any other way? A. The absence of Baptism can be supplied by martyrdom, which is called Baptism of Blood, or by an act of perfect love of God, or of contrition, along with the desire, at least implicit, of Baptism, and this is called Baptism of Desire.