Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Was Fr. Feeneys Excommunication Doubtful?  (Read 3743 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Was Fr. Feeneys Excommunication Doubtful?
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2015, 10:43:08 AM »
Quote from: Francisco
Bishop (later Cardinal) John Wright who was, I believe involved in the Fr Feeney affair, and I also hear that a separate bishopric was created for him ( for a job well done???), and who as cardinal gave Abp Lefebvre a "letter of commendation" for his then infant SSPX, has featured briefly, but graphically, in Randy Engel's book "The Rite of Sodomy".


I have posted an article in the Library section by Hutton Gibson. This is what he says in the last paragraph:-

http://huttongibson.com/index-detail.php?Novus-Ordo-from-Pius-XII-69

[I must admit that I have never been too happy with Eugenio Pacelli. I have the impression that, like Montini, he was reared to become pope. He, like Della Chiesa (Benedict XV), was secretary to one of our worst enemies, Cardinal Rampolla, who was almost elected pope in 1903. He was soft on Darwin’s fable of Evolution. Some suspected that he muzzled Father Charles Coughlin. Perhaps he was as sure as I that we would eventually be embroiled in World War Two, during which Roosevelt allowed the bombing of Monte Cassino and his fellow-Mason Truman atom-bombed the two best known centers of Catholicism in Japan, and was concerned that an “unfriendly” Vatican might suffer like treatment. In Sacramentum ordinis he demonstrated deficiency in logic and theology. He kicked Montini upstairs for homicidal treachery. He permitted a female prostitute to maintain permanent quarters in the Vatican. He himself was as queer as Montini. But as far as most Catholics knew, he was properly elected and not a public heretic. We have been taken over from the top by a gradual process, unknown to most until it surfaced with John XXIII. Vatican II let the cat out of the bag, but hardly anyone noticed. We didn’t react until implementation far beyond its stated provisions.]

Was Fr. Feeneys Excommunication Doubtful?
« Reply #11 on: April 23, 2015, 11:42:38 AM »
Quote from: Francisco
Quote from: Francisco
Bishop (later Cardinal) John Wright who was, I believe involved in the Fr Feeney affair, and I also hear that a separate bishopric was created for him ( for a job well done???), and who as cardinal gave Abp Lefebvre a "letter of commendation" for his then infant SSPX, has featured briefly, but graphically, in Randy Engel's book "The Rite of Sodomy".


I have posted an article in the Library section by Hutton Gibson. This is what he says in the last paragraph:-

http://huttongibson.com/index-detail.php?Novus-Ordo-from-Pius-XII-69

[I must admit that I have never been too happy with Eugenio Pacelli. I have the impression that, like Montini, he was reared to become pope. He, like Della Chiesa (Benedict XV), was secretary to one of our worst enemies, Cardinal Rampolla, who was almost elected pope in 1903. He was soft on Darwin’s fable of Evolution. Some suspected that he muzzled Father Charles Coughlin. Perhaps he was as sure as I that we would eventually be embroiled in World War Two, during which Roosevelt allowed the bombing of Monte Cassino and his fellow-Mason Truman atom-bombed the two best known centers of Catholicism in Japan, and was concerned that an “unfriendly” Vatican might suffer like treatment. In Sacramentum ordinis he demonstrated deficiency in logic and theology. He kicked Montini upstairs for homicidal treachery. He permitted a female prostitute to maintain permanent quarters in the Vatican. He himself was as queer as Montini. But as far as most Catholics knew, he was properly elected and not a public heretic. We have been taken over from the top by a gradual process, unknown to most until it surfaced with John XXIII. Vatican II let the cat out of the bag, but hardly anyone noticed. We didn’t react until implementation far beyond its stated provisions.]


I only comment to say that this seems very accurate to me:

Quote
We have been taken over from the top by a gradual process, unknown to most until it surfaced with John XXIII. Vatican II let the cat out of the bag, but hardly anyone noticed. We didn’t react until implementation far beyond its stated provisions.


Was Fr. Feeneys Excommunication Doubtful?
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2015, 11:44:27 AM »
And let me add: Father Feeney noticed, even when the cat was still wriggling in the bag.

Was Fr. Feeneys Excommunication Doubtful?
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2015, 12:52:25 PM »
Quote from: Francisco
Quote from: Francisco
Bishop (later Cardinal) John Wright who was, I believe involved in the Fr Feeney affair, and I also hear that a separate bishopric was created for him ( for a job well done???), and who as cardinal gave Abp Lefebvre a "letter of commendation" for his then infant SSPX, has featured briefly, but graphically, in Randy Engel's book "The Rite of Sodomy".


I have posted an article in the Library section by Hutton Gibson. This is what he says in the last paragraph:-

http://huttongibson.com/index-detail.php?Novus-Ordo-from-Pius-XII-69

[I must admit that I have never been too happy with Eugenio Pacelli. I have the impression that, like Montini, he was reared to become pope. He, like Della Chiesa (Benedict XV), was secretary to one of our worst enemies, Cardinal Rampolla, who was almost elected pope in 1903. He was soft on Darwin’s fable of Evolution. Some suspected that he muzzled Father Charles Coughlin. Perhaps he was as sure as I that we would eventually be embroiled in World War Two, during which Roosevelt allowed the bombing of Monte Cassino and his fellow-Mason Truman atom-bombed the two best known centers of Catholicism in Japan, and was concerned that an “unfriendly” Vatican might suffer like treatment. In Sacramentum ordinis he demonstrated deficiency in logic and theology. He kicked Montini upstairs for homicidal treachery. He permitted a female prostitute to maintain permanent quarters in the Vatican. He himself was as queer as Montini. But as far as most Catholics knew, he was properly elected and not a public heretic. We have been taken over from the top by a gradual process, unknown to most until it surfaced with John XXIII. Vatican II let the cat out of the bag, but hardly anyone noticed. We didn’t react until implementation far beyond its stated provisions.]


As one of the libelers of Card Rampolla( who Card Sarto votes for)  H Gibson is very dangerous indeed.  :detective:

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Was Fr. Feeneys Excommunication Doubtful?
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2015, 01:33:12 PM »
Quote from: roscoe
Quote from: Francisco
Quote from: Francisco
Bishop (later Cardinal) John Wright who was, I believe involved in the Fr Feeney affair, and I also hear that a separate bishopric was created for him ( for a job well done???), and who as cardinal gave Abp Lefebvre a "letter of commendation" for his then infant SSPX, has featured briefly, but graphically, in Randy Engel's book "The Rite of Sodomy".


I have posted an article in the Library section by Hutton Gibson. This is what he says in the last paragraph:-

http://huttongibson.com/index-detail.php?Novus-Ordo-from-Pius-XII-69

[I must admit that I have never been too happy with Eugenio Pacelli. I have the impression that, like Montini, he was reared to become pope. He, like Della Chiesa (Benedict XV), was secretary to one of our worst enemies, Cardinal Rampolla, who was almost elected pope in 1903. He was soft on Darwin’s fable of Evolution. Some suspected that he muzzled Father Charles Coughlin. Perhaps he was as sure as I that we would eventually be embroiled in World War Two, during which Roosevelt allowed the bombing of Monte Cassino and his fellow-Mason Truman atom-bombed the two best known centers of Catholicism in Japan, and was concerned that an “unfriendly” Vatican might suffer like treatment. In Sacramentum ordinis he demonstrated deficiency in logic and theology. He kicked Montini upstairs for homicidal treachery. He permitted a female prostitute to maintain permanent quarters in the Vatican. He himself was as queer as Montini. But as far as most Catholics knew, he was properly elected and not a public heretic. We have been taken over from the top by a gradual process, unknown to most until it surfaced with John XXIII. Vatican II let the cat out of the bag, but hardly anyone noticed. We didn’t react until implementation far beyond its stated provisions.]


As one of the libelers of Card Rampolla( who Card Sarto votes for)  H Gibson is very dangerous indeed.  :detective:


As soon as I saw the negative comment about Rampolla, I know that it would get you worked up.

 :laugh1: