Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here  (Read 3151 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lover of Truth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8700
  • Reputation: +1159/-864
  • Gender: Male
Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
« Reply #45 on: April 11, 2014, 07:47:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Correction:

    The outer INNER bonds of unity (non-members within the Church by desire)

    1.  Supernatural Faith

    2.  Perfect Charity

    3.  The gifts of the Holy Ghost

    4.  Sanctifying grace (one cannot have perfect charity and not be in a state of sanctifying grace and sanctifying grace can only be obtained within the Church)

    If you died and you had the choice of either dying as a member of the Church in the state of mortal sin or within the Church as a non-member in the state of sanctifying grace which would you chose?

    God is not the arbitrary tyrant that some bloggers would have Him to be as He does not condemn those, who THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN, are not aware of the necessity of the Church and or have not been baptized.  He only condemns souls to the pains eternal hellfire for sins they are guilty (culpable) of.

    Of course the unbaptized infants who die with Original Sin on their souls (do not suffer the pains of eternal Hell-fire either, but rather a state of perfect natural happiness).  We only suffer the punishment of pain if we are culpable of an actual sin.  Though we cannot obtain the Beatific Vision unless we are cleansed of Original Sin.  Infants cannot desire to be members of the Church or to be Baptized, this is why they do not obtain the Beatific Vision despite not being culpable of any actual sin.

    I'm sure you know most if not all of this.  But I just wanted to make myself as clear as possible.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Exurge

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 120
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #46 on: April 11, 2014, 08:30:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Correction:

    The outer INNER bonds of unity (non-members within the Church by desire)

    1.  Supernatural Faith

    2.  Perfect Charity

    3.  The gifts of the Holy Ghost

    4.  Sanctifying grace (one cannot have perfect charity and not be in a state of sanctifying grace and sanctifying grace can only be obtained within the Church)

    If you died and you had the choice of either dying as a member of the Church in the state of mortal sin or within the Church as a non-member in the state of sanctifying grace which would you chose?

    God is not the arbitrary tyrant that some bloggers would have Him to be as He does not condemn those, who THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN, are not aware of the necessity of the Church and or have not been baptized.  He only condemns souls to the pains eternal hellfire for sins they are guilty (culpable) of.

    Of course the unbaptized infants who die with Original Sin on their souls (do not suffer the pains of eternal Hell-fire either, but rather a state of perfect natural happiness).  We only suffer the punishment of pain if we are culpable of an actual sin.  Though we cannot obtain the Beatific Vision unless we are cleansed of Original Sin.  Infants cannot desire to be members of the Church or to be Baptized, this is why they do not obtain the Beatific Vision despite not being culpable of any actual sin.

    I'm sure you know most if not all of this.  But I just wanted to make myself as clear as possible.


    Yeah I do know most of it.


    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #47 on: April 11, 2014, 08:34:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How can anyone hope to s of ANYTHINg, when the BODers deny the clearest dogma there is? The BODers believe that anyone can be saved even if they have no explcit belief in Christ and the Trinity, AND not only that, they believe that someone can be saved who has no explcit desire to be baptized nor martyred, nor explcit desire to even be a Catholic! This belief of theirs is not taught by any Father, doctor or saint, and it is opposed to clear dogma of Florence, and St. Thomas, yet they still cling to it.


    Quote from: bowler
    The clear uncompromising teaching of the doctrine that one must at least believe explicitly in the Incarnation (=Christ) and the Trinity for salvation, is the basis for the labors of all who seek to maintain and restore traditional Catholicity, though most of those who are engaged in this struggle have yet to realize the fact. Without at least this doctrine, assented to absolutely, and the condemnation of the opposing view, Traditionalists have no case nor argument against anything in Vatican II. Anyone who says they "don't condemn" the opposite opinion, by the very act, approve it, and thus become like the salt that looses its flavor, neutralized, precisely where the enemies of the Church want them to be neutralized.

    Quote
    But whoever dares to say: “Outside the Church is no salvation”, ought to be driven from the State
    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, Book IV, Ch. 8

    ( http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/rousseau/social-contract/ )


    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Vatican I
    The Catholic Church has always held that there is a twofold order of knowledge, and that these two orders are distinguished from one another not only in their principle but in their object; in one we know by natural reason, in the other by Divine faith; the object of the one is truth attainable by natural reason, the object of the other is mysteries hidden in God, but which we have to believe and which can only be known to us by Divine revelation.


    This is why I have always held that the opinion that the existence of God as rewarder cannot suffice for supernatural faith.  Vatican I here finishes off holding to that opinion once and for all.


    It confirms the unanimous opinion of the Fathers (considered infallible) as expounded in the ancient Athanasian Creed, it was the teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas, and it was clearly infallible decreed at the Council of Florence:


    Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra: “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.– But the Catholic faith is this, that we worship one God in the Trinity, and the Trinity in unity... Therefore let him who wishes to be saved, think thus concerning the Trinity. “But it is necessary for eternal salvation that he faithfully believe also in the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ...the Son of God is God and man...– This is the Catholic faith; unless each one believes this faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.”



    Athanasian Creed


    1. Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic faith;
    2. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
     3. And the Catholic faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity;
    4. Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance.
     5. For there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Spirit.
     6. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is all one, the glory equal, the majesty coeternal.
     7. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Spirit.
     8. The Father uncreated, the Son uncreated, and the Holy Spirit uncreated.
     9. The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the Holy Spirit incomprehensible.
     10. The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Spirit eternal.
     11. And yet they are not three eternals but one eternal.
     12. As also there are not three uncreated nor three incomprehensible, but one uncreated and one incomprehensible.
     13. So likewise the Father is almighty, the Son almighty, and the Holy Spirit almighty.
     14. And yet they are not three almighties, but one almighty.
     15. So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God;
     16. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God.
     17. So likewise the Father is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Spirit Lord;
     18. And yet they are not three Lords but one Lord.
     19. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by himself to be God and Lord;
     20. So are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say; There are three Gods or three Lords.
     21. The Father is made of none, neither created nor begotten.
     22. The Son is of the Father alone; not made nor created, but begotten.
     23. The Holy Spirit is of the Father and of the Son; neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding.
     24. So there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Spirit, not three Holy Spirits.
     25. And in this Trinity none is afore or after another; none is greater or less than another.
     26. But the whole three persons are coeternal, and coequal.
     27. So that in all things, as aforesaid, the Unity in Trinity and the Trinity in Unity is to be worshipped.
     28. He therefore that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity.
    29. Furthermore it is necessary to everlasting salvation that he also believe rightly the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ.  
     30. For the right faith is that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and man.
     31. God of the substance of the Father, begotten before the worlds; and man of substance of His mother, born in the world.
     32. Perfect God and perfect man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting.
     33. Equal to the Father as touching His Godhead, and inferior to the Father as touching His manhood.
     34. Who, although He is God and man, yet He is not two, but one Christ.
     35. One, not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh, but by taking of that manhood into God.
     36. One altogether, not by confusion of substance, but by unity of person.
     37. For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and man is one Christ;
     38. Who suffered for our salvation, descended into hell, rose again the third day from the dead;
     39. He ascended into heaven, He sits on the right hand of the Father, God, Almighty;
     40. From thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
     41. At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies;
     42. and shall give account of their own works.
     43. And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting and they that have done evil into everlasting fire.
    44. This is the catholic faith, which except a man believe faithfully he cannot be saved.  


    St. Thomas Aquinas:

     St. Thomas, Summa Theologica: "After grace had been revealed both the learned and simple folk are bound to explicit faith in the mysteries of Christ chiefly as regards those which are observed throughout the Church, and publicly proclaimed, such as the articles which refer to the Incarnation, of which we have spoken above."(Pt.II-II, Q.2, A.7.)

     Saint Thomas, Summa Theologica: "And consequently, when once grace had been revealed, all were bound to explicit faith in the mystery of the Trinity." (Pt.II-II, Q.2, A.8.)


    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #48 on: April 11, 2014, 08:49:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How can anyone hope to convince BODers of ANYTHING, when the BODers deny the clearest dogma there is? The BODers believe that anyone can be saved even if they have no explcit belief in Christ and the Trinity, AND not only that, they believe that someone can be saved who has no explcit desire to be baptized nor martyred, nor explcit desire to even be a Catholic! This belief of theirs is not taught by any Father, Doctor or Saint, and it is opposed to clear dogma of Florence, and St. Thomas, the Athanasian Creed etc., yet they pertinaciously still cling to it. It is IMPOSSIBLE to convince people like this of ANYTHING when that is what they WANT/DESIRE to believe!


    Quote from: bowler
    The clear uncompromising teaching of the doctrine that one must at least believe explicitly in the Incarnation (=Christ) and the Trinity for salvation, is the basis for the labors of all who seek to maintain and restore traditional Catholicity, though most of those who are engaged in this struggle have yet to realize the fact. Without at least this doctrine, assented to absolutely, and the condemnation of the opposing view, Traditionalists have no case nor argument against anything in Vatican II. Anyone who says they "don't condemn" the opposite opinion, by the very act, approve it, and thus become like the salt that looses its flavor, neutralized, precisely where the enemies of the Church want them to be neutralized.

    Quote
    But whoever dares to say: “Outside the Church is no salvation”, ought to be driven from the State
    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, Book IV, Ch. 8

    ( http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/rousseau/social-contract/ )


    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Vatican I
    The Catholic Church has always held that there is a twofold order of knowledge, and that these two orders are distinguished from one another not only in their principle but in their object; in one we know by natural reason, in the other by Divine faith; the object of the one is truth attainable by natural reason, the object of the other is mysteries hidden in God, but which we have to believe and which can only be known to us by Divine revelation.


    This is why I have always held that the opinion that the existence of God as rewarder cannot suffice for supernatural faith.  Vatican I here finishes off holding to that opinion once and for all.


    It confirms the unanimous opinion of the Fathers (considered infallible) as expounded in the ancient Athanasian Creed, it was the teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas, and it was clearly infallible decreed at the Council of Florence:


    Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra: “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.– But the Catholic faith is this, that we worship one God in the Trinity, and the Trinity in unity... Therefore let him who wishes to be saved, think thus concerning the Trinity. “But it is necessary for eternal salvation that he faithfully believe also in the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ...the Son of God is God and man...– This is the Catholic faith; unless each one believes this faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.”



    Athanasian Creed


    1. Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic faith;
    2. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
     3. And the Catholic faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity;
    4. Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance.
     5. For there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Spirit.
     6. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is all one, the glory equal, the majesty coeternal.
     7. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Spirit.
     8. The Father uncreated, the Son uncreated, and the Holy Spirit uncreated.
     9. The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the Holy Spirit incomprehensible.
     10. The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Spirit eternal.
     11. And yet they are not three eternals but one eternal.
     12. As also there are not three uncreated nor three incomprehensible, but one uncreated and one incomprehensible.
     13. So likewise the Father is almighty, the Son almighty, and the Holy Spirit almighty.
     14. And yet they are not three almighties, but one almighty.
     15. So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God;
     16. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God.
     17. So likewise the Father is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Spirit Lord;
     18. And yet they are not three Lords but one Lord.
     19. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by himself to be God and Lord;
     20. So are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say; There are three Gods or three Lords.
     21. The Father is made of none, neither created nor begotten.
     22. The Son is of the Father alone; not made nor created, but begotten.
     23. The Holy Spirit is of the Father and of the Son; neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding.
     24. So there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Spirit, not three Holy Spirits.
     25. And in this Trinity none is afore or after another; none is greater or less than another.
     26. But the whole three persons are coeternal, and coequal.
     27. So that in all things, as aforesaid, the Unity in Trinity and the Trinity in Unity is to be worshipped.
     28. He therefore that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity.
    29. Furthermore it is necessary to everlasting salvation that he also believe rightly the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ.  
     30. For the right faith is that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and man.
     31. God of the substance of the Father, begotten before the worlds; and man of substance of His mother, born in the world.
     32. Perfect God and perfect man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting.
     33. Equal to the Father as touching His Godhead, and inferior to the Father as touching His manhood.
     34. Who, although He is God and man, yet He is not two, but one Christ.
     35. One, not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh, but by taking of that manhood into God.
     36. One altogether, not by confusion of substance, but by unity of person.
     37. For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and man is one Christ;
     38. Who suffered for our salvation, descended into hell, rose again the third day from the dead;
     39. He ascended into heaven, He sits on the right hand of the Father, God, Almighty;
     40. From thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
     41. At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies;
     42. and shall give account of their own works.
     43. And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting and they that have done evil into everlasting fire.
    44. This is the catholic faith, which except a man believe faithfully he cannot be saved.  


    St. Thomas Aquinas:

     St. Thomas, Summa Theologica: "After grace had been revealed both the learned and simple folk are bound to explicit faith in the mysteries of Christ chiefly as regards those which are observed throughout the Church, and publicly proclaimed, such as the articles which refer to the Incarnation, of which we have spoken above."(Pt.II-II, Q.2, A.7.)

     Saint Thomas, Summa Theologica: "And consequently, when once grace had been revealed, all were bound to explicit faith in the mystery of the Trinity." (Pt.II-II, Q.2, A.8.)


    Offline Nishant

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +0/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #49 on: April 11, 2014, 09:21:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: John
    Can someone like Ambrose, SJB, Marie Anthony, Nichant or you please straiten me out on where the existence of God can be believed with an supernatural faith and explain why or why not this is so?


    John, many theologians on both sides note how especially fitting it is that the primary object of supernatural faith proposed to us be in itself a mystery that transcends even the possibility of natural knowledge.

    Quote from: Fr. Garrigou Lagrange
    The Trinity is a mystery essentially supernatural. St. Thomas expounds the reason for this truth much more clearly than his predecessors did. By natural reason, he says, we know God only as Creator. Now God creates by His omnipotence, which is common to all three persons, as is the divine nature of which omnipotence is an attribute. Hence natural reason cannot know the distinction of persons in God, but only His one nature. In this argument we have one of the most explicit expressions of the distinction between the natural order and the supernatural order.


    Theologians are allowed by the Church to hold and defend the teaching they wish and to advance reasons in its favor.

    The problem with modern Feeneyites, and this is only symptomatic of the larger problem, is they have completely lost any concept of submission to Church authority, to the approval of superiors etc. Whereas, even the most competent of theologians in the past did not usually publish without the express approbation of ecclesiastical authority.

    This is why Feeneyites quickly develop a sectarian mentality.


    Offline Exurge

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 120
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #50 on: April 11, 2014, 09:58:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 0

    Offline Exurge

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 120
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #51 on: April 11, 2014, 10:02:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nishant
    The problem with modern Feeneyites, and this is only symptomatic of the larger problem, is they have completely lost any concept of submission to Church authority, to the approval of superiors etc. Whereas, even the most competent of theologians in the past did not usually publish without the express approbation of ecclesiastical authority.

    This is why Feeneyites quickly develop a sectarian mentality.


    Yeah. See how the Dimonds "came to their own conclusion" on no bod/bob:

    From the Treatise:
    Quote
    The dogma Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation really has nothing to do with Father Leonard Feeney. (In fact, I had never heard of Fr. Feeney when I came to the same conclusion – based upon Catholic dogma – that the Sacrament of Baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation and that all those who die as non‐Catholics are lost.) It has to do with the teaching of the Chair of St. Peter, as I have shown, which is the authentic and infallible teaching of Christ. To reject this Catholic dogma is to reject Christ Himself.


    There you have the source of it all - just like a Protestant "comes to the conclusion that the Bible and the Bible only is the only authority by reading the Bible" - so did the Dimonds "come to the conclusion" that there is no bod or bob by disregarding everything else Saints Doctors and theologians have said and making up their own theology.

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #52 on: April 11, 2014, 10:57:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Exurge
    Quote from: Nishant
    The problem with modern Feeneyites, and this is only symptomatic of the larger problem, is they have completely lost any concept of submission to Church authority, to the approval of superiors etc. Whereas, even the most competent of theologians in the past did not usually publish without the express approbation of ecclesiastical authority.

    This is why Feeneyites quickly develop a sectarian mentality.


    Yeah. See how the Dimonds "came to their own conclusion" on no bod/bob:

    From the Treatise:
    Quote
    The dogma Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation really has nothing to do with Father Leonard Feeney. (In fact, I had never heard of Fr. Feeney when I came to the same conclusion – based upon Catholic dogma – that the Sacrament of Baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation and that all those who die as non‐Catholics are lost.) It has to do with the teaching of the Chair of St. Peter, as I have shown, which is the authentic and infallible teaching of Christ. To reject this Catholic dogma is to reject Christ Himself.


    There you have the source of it all - just like a Protestant "comes to the conclusion that the Bible and the Bible only is the only authority by reading the Bible" - so did the Dimonds "come to the conclusion" that there is no bod or bob by disregarding everything else Saints Doctors and theologians have said and making up their own theology.


    Well stated.

    Pride is at the root of much if not all heresy.  The idea that one knows more than the Church.  This is what led Satan to fall, and Luther and Ratzinger and Feeney and the Dimonds and perhaps some bloggers on this site.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


    Offline Exurge

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 120
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #53 on: April 11, 2014, 11:18:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Well stated.

    Pride is at the root of much if not all heresy.  The idea that one knows more than the Church.  This is what led Satan to fall, and Luther and Ratzinger and Feeney and the Dimonds and perhaps some bloggers on this site.


    I have been against implicit faith before but now i am trying to understand it because the fact is that it has never been condemned by the Church and to say that it is erroneous or heretical is to accuse the Church.

    I only have a few questions on implicit faith because, after all, we are dealing with eternal Hell and we shouldn't be quick to send people there.

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #54 on: April 11, 2014, 11:34:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Exurge
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Well stated.

    Pride is at the root of much if not all heresy.  The idea that one knows more than the Church.  This is what led Satan to fall, and Luther and Ratzinger and Feeney and the Dimonds and perhaps some bloggers on this site.


    I have been against implicit faith before but now i am trying to understand it because the fact is that it has never been condemned by the Church and to say that it is erroneous or heretical is to accuse the Church.

    I only have a few questions on implicit faith because, after all, we are dealing with eternal Hell and we shouldn't be quick to send people there.


    I see.

    Please let me know if the following helps at all:

    These are from a site that has promoted Father Wathen.

    They do not all go into implicit desire but they should give you a better over all view.  

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13May/may6ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13May/may16ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13May/may23ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Jun/jun3ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Jun/jun11ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Jul/jul3ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Jul/jul10ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Jul/jul17ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Jul/jul24ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Jul/jul31ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Sep/sep4ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Sep/sep11ftt.htm

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Sep/sep18ftt.htm

    This series stopped when Mike Cain's wife got sick.  But I can PM you the rest if you like.  
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #55 on: April 11, 2014, 11:40:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nishant
    Theologians are allowed by the Church to hold and defend the teaching they wish and to advance reasons in its favor.



    Unless they teach something which you don't like, like the theologians at Vatican II, then they are heretics and fallen away from the faith.

    All the clear dogmas, Fathers, Doctors, saints mean nothing, just find a quote from some theologian (like Garrigou-Lagrange from 1950's) that teaches that one can be saved without belief in Christ, and you can then flush down the toilet the ancient Athanasian Creed, and all the clear dogmas, Fathers, Doctors, saints.

    Yeah, that makes sense. NOT!


    Offline Nishant

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +0/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #56 on: April 11, 2014, 12:03:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If you did not understand that in the previous post I made an argument in favor of explicit faith in Christ being necessary as a means without which no one is saved, I do not know what is the point of doing this with you any longer.

    Quote from: Nishant
    "John, many theologians on both sides note how especially fitting it is that the primary object of supernatural faith proposed to us be in itself a mystery that transcends even the possibility of natural knowledge. "


    In other words, this was an argument in favor of the proposition that explicit knowledge of the Trinity is required to make an act of supernatural faith.

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Lolz, threads on BOD, BOB, EENS will never end here
    « Reply #57 on: April 11, 2014, 12:22:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Exurge
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Well stated.

    Pride is at the root of much if not all heresy.  The idea that one knows more than the Church.  This is what led Satan to fall, and Luther and Ratzinger and Feeney and the Dimonds and perhaps some bloggers on this site.


    I have been against implicit faith before but now i am trying to understand it because the fact is that it has never been condemned by the Church and to say that it is erroneous or heretical is to accuse the Church.

    I only have a few questions on implicit faith because, after all, we are dealing with eternal Hell and we shouldn't be quick to send people there.


    To be clear, explicit faith is necessary, but once can be saved with merely an implicit desire to be within the Church as a member and or for the Sacrament of Baptism so long as the other requisites are present.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church