Listen Ladi, you are arrogant and way too proud to admit you don't have any sources other than yourself. So cut the crap and quit whining about "I started the thread" and back up what you say. I don't think you can, that's why I'll continue to demand you docuмent your positions.
I agree with bowler. You need to go have a beer or something. You are a very bitter and angry man.
I am not aware of any commentary on this passage, nor do I have the library you seem to have. If you have a quote that understands this passage differently than how it actually reads, then YOU produce it. I'm simply looking at the passage at face value and reading it word for word. You are obviously not competent to engage in any theological discussion whatsoever. Instead you just bark in on every page with some insult or demand for proof. Again, if you want to interpret this passage away to mean something OTHER than it actually says, then the burden of proof is on you. If I were to cite the dogmatic pronouncement of Pius IX that Our Lady was conceived without original sin, you would demand that I prove that this passage didn't mean that Our Lady was conceived WITH original sin. Go get a life.
He didn't say to have a beer, he said to get drunk!

The reason you people have a problem with SJB is because you and he live in two different worlds. He behaves as a Catholic, all of you act as Protestants, you think you have the right and the power to is peak for the magisterium or explain points of the Faith.
The only cure is humility. Until you realize that, you will wallow in heresy and error.