Have any of you here seen this blog post by the sedevacantist blogger Introibo Ad Altare Dei? I've never seen it brought up here, where the arguments against Baptism of Desire tend to be much more intelligent and reasonable than the ones the blogger brings up in this post. Moreover, the post seems to ignore the necessity of explicit faith for baptism and conflates the issues of EENS and BoD into one issue when that's not actually what Fr. Feeney ever did.

Have any of you read the article before? And, if so, what do you think of it?

http://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2019/07/feeneyite-follies.html

There's also a second article that I may post sometime if this thread gets enough responses.

I skimmed it too but a big thing/problem is that most if not all”feeneyites” on this forum are close to where Fr feeney himself was at, whereas most of the article is really directed at dimondism (for lack of a better word) which includes a feeneyite view on BOD but ALSO an extremely dogmatic sedevacantism
And an extreme judgment of all Catholics who are not feeneyites, which you don’t see in Fr feeney, st Benedict center, or on this forum.
I’m on the “liberal” side of the BOD debate but I can be fair, I think the arguments are decent ones against dimondism but not really great at feeneyism that actually stops where Fr feeney did