Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Root of Lover of Truth's Illness  (Read 13656 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: The Root of Lover of Truth's Illness
« Reply #50 on: September 19, 2017, 01:11:12 PM »
These errors, in their turn, had stemmed from a false attitude toward the docuмents of ecclesiastical magisterium. They were, together, "deadly fruits" of a tendency to ignore the clear teachings of the Sovereign Pontiffs, teaching in the course of their ordinary doctrinal activity. Fenton

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: The Root of Lover of Truth's Illness
« Reply #51 on: September 19, 2017, 01:46:38 PM »
 ;)


Re: The Root of Lover of Truth's Illness
« Reply #52 on: September 19, 2017, 01:50:19 PM »
The Catholic assertion of the truth that there is no salvation outside the true Church is and has always been a point on which the attacks of the Church's enemies have been centered with particular intensity. A claim that the Catholic Church is a highly acceptable religious society, or even that it is by far the best religious organization, would never have aroused any special animosity against the Church. As a matter of fact, claims of this sort have always been made and are still being made by religious societies distinct from the Catholic Church. What the enemies of the Church have always found and still find infuriating is the Catholic insistence on the truth that the Catholic Church is actually the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, the one and only true supernatural kingdom of God on earth, the only social body within which men are to find salvific contact with God through Our Lord. Fenton 

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: The Root of Lover of Truth's Illness
« Reply #53 on: September 19, 2017, 02:11:43 PM »
 :cheers:

Re: The Root of Lover of Truth's Illness
« Reply #54 on: September 19, 2017, 02:38:23 PM »
 There have been various ways in which Catholic writers have tended to reduce the teaching on the necessity of the Church for salvation to a meaningless formula. Among them, the following may be regarded as among the most important: 

(1) A few writers, obviously unschooled in sacred theology, have simply rejected the formula itself, and thus completely denied the teaching. The unfortunate Arnold hαɾɾιs Mathew, writing during his days as a Catholic, produced teaching of this sort. He makes this statement in the chapter "Extra Ecclesiam Salus Nulla," in the symposium Ecclesia: The Church of Christ, a work which Matthew himself edited:

Now the further question arises as to how far Catholics are bound to hold that for those outside the Roman Church there is no salvation. Catholics are not bound to hold anything of the kind. [Mathew, in his chapter, "Extra Ecclesiam Salus Nulla," in the symposium, Ecclesia: The Church of Christ, edited by Arnold hαɾɾιs Mathew (London: Burns and Oates, 1906), p. 148.] Fenton