Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14

Author Topic: The Holy Office Letter Suprema Haec Sacra  (Read 6291 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Clemens Maria

Re: The Holy Office Letter Suprema Haec Sacra
« Reply #55 on: September 13, 2017, 12:43:10 PM »
Quote from: Lover of Truth on September 13, 2017, 08:58:50 AM
:facepalm:
Again the burden of proof is being unreasonably shifted. The letter came from the Holy Office to the Abp. of Boston. It was made public in 1953 and appeared in several periodicals. It was included in Denzinger. The docuŠ¼ent says His Holiness approved the doctrine set forth therein. The Pope is the head of the Holy Office. We have met our burden of proof. If anyone believes that Pius XII did NOT approve this, the burden of proof is now on him to prove it. Not on us.
But when they try to prove it you immediately reject all their attempts without even considering the merits of their arguments.  You have set up a catch-22 for them.
Logged

Offline JPaul

Re: The Holy Office Letter Suprema Haec Sacra
« Reply #56 on: September 13, 2017, 12:50:26 PM »
Quote from: Lover of Truth on September 13, 2017, 08:55:14 AM
Feeney right.
Augustine, Ambrose, Aquinas, Bellarmine, Innocent II, Innocent III, Alphonsus, Pius IX, Pius X, Pius XI, Pius XII wrong. :facepalm:
Bye bye Feeneyites.  
Another moronic reply. LoH posits that all the Saints and Popes would agree with the heresies that were being taught a Boston College with the approval of Cushing in which case the see of Rome would have been been vacant for a very very long time.    CI is becoming a daycare for the weak minded. :baby:
Logged

Offline Lover of Truth

Re: The Holy Office Letter Suprema Haec Sacra
« Reply #57 on: September 13, 2017, 12:57:00 PM »
Quote from: Clemens Maria on September 13, 2017, 12:43:10 PM
But when they try to prove it you immediately reject all their attempts without even considering the merits of their arguments.  You have set up a catch-22 for them.
Are you a Feeneyite?  I want to start a thread where I debate one Feeneyite the seems civil.  You and thornpage seem to be.  It gets off track with name-calling and false accusations.  They hold a none-Catholic position and I learned some time ago reading what they say is usually a waste of time.  So I skim alot and post truth.  

They never consider the merits of the Catholic Church's teaching which I present.  
I was almost a Feeneyite I have considered all the "merits" of their arguments almost ready to accept them.  
 
Logged

Offline DZ PLEASE

Re: The Holy Office Letter Suprema Haec Sacra
« Reply #58 on: September 13, 2017, 01:13:07 PM »
Quote from: Lover of Truth on September 13, 2017, 12:57:00 PM
 They never consider the merits of the Catholic Church's teaching which I present. 
Does this guy ever listen to himself?

There was a time when you'd be sweeping up your teeth for saying something like that face to face.
Then again, you aren't the sort to say something like that face to face.

"... which I present."
You sir, are a lying, POS heretic plain and simple.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: The Holy Office Letter Suprema Haec Sacra
« Reply #59 on: September 13, 2017, 01:14:48 PM »
Quote from: roscoe on September 13, 2017, 12:30:27 PM
MO is also that you are wasting your time is a futile effort to show that the sacrament of baptism is not required. 

:applause:
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14
« previous next »