There seems to be a lot of pissing and moaning about the Diamonds recently...
I am curious what you think are the ACTUAL errors they have.
i.e., They say (I know they have changed their position over the years) that R&R is heretical/schismatic because amounts to a practical denial of papal infallibility and the indefectible nature of the Church. They say R&R are in schism because they insist Bergs, Pervert, etc. are legitimate Pope's - but they refuse to submit to him.
Is it simply that their version of what the crisis is doesn't follow your own?
Or, is there an actual heresy you think they have, or any way someone could qualify how they are in schism according to the definition?
So you might be like, "They deny indefectability - see here this theologian said there has to be a Pope every minute of the day and "X" amount of cardinals and bishops."
Or you might be like, "They are schismatics because they don't acknowledge Leo as the head of the Church - they need to acknowledge him as Pope and then resist him in everything and shun him as a heretic like me!"
Do, you have anything substantial to accuse them of that the theology can back up - or do you just not like them very much because they seem arrogant, prideful, they hurt your feelings, etc.?