So you're not a hard core feeneyite. And the sacrament of Baptism is NOT REQUIRED in EVERY case. Catechumens are NOT yet recieved the Sacrament.
No, but the vow is. Show me otherwise, and I will believe.
Doesn't matter. The "vow" is implicit anyway. The point is that THE SACRAMENT of BAPTISM is not NOT required in EVERY case. Do you now admit this?
This is heresy, and if you had lived during the Middle Ages and said this, they would have burned you. A vow cannot be implicit, it cannot be unconscious. There are no "anonymous Christians," only Christians and non-Christians. From the Council of Trent:
Canon 5. If anyone says that baptism is optional, that is, not necessary for salvation, let him be anathema.
it is not optional, but at times, cannot be administered.....there are always exceptions beyond a persons means......
you know, the cut and paste job is like Prots, they thump the bible and say "thats what it says, thats what it means" without going any further....very anti-intellectual and much closer to Prot-ism this Sedeism...
What Trent is saying is some were saying it is optional,therefore, will not get it or wait until it suits me....this was opinion of anabaptists and some others....did not mean those who would not help it.....again, Trent did not teach some form of double Predestination.........