Really? Because he taught and defended the EENS dogma he's an obstinate heretic? You're simply another dishonest BODer who has nothing, so you shoot your spit wads at a deceased, courageous priest and theologian. At least being a legend in your own mind you certainly can't plead ignorance.

Always remember that it is a defined dogma at Trent that the sacrament is necessary for salvation and without the sacrament men cannot be justified, not only that, but men cannot even be justified without the desire for the sacrament. To say that without the sacrament or the desire for the sacrament that men can be justified by faith alone as you keep saying, is, you guessed it, condemned with anathema.  

Its like we are dancing in a circle here.
Fr. Feeney was neither courageous nor was he a theologian. Rather he was a product of his time and a heretic who was on the opposite end of the spectrum to the disgusting apostate Cushing who should have been excommunicated and condemned far more aggressively than Feeney. Feeney's heresy is far less pernicious than Cushing's.
Again for the millionth time, you don't get to interpret Trent.

Can you explain more about how Fr. Feeney had Calvinistic leanings? I haven't head that before. I usually avoid discussions about Fr. Feeney, because I haven't studied much about him.

Perish the thought that a person predestined to eternal life could be allowed to end this life without the sacrament of the mediator.

My guess is that his notion is related to Calvinistic predesination.  But St. Augustine's notion of predestination (alluded to in the previous citation I just made) has nothing to do with Calvinism, but, rather, anti-Pelagianism.

Here's an excellent, scholarly, and well-balanced discussion regarding the theological status of Baptism of Desire:
https://catholicism.org/baptism-of-desire-its-origin-and-abandonment-in-the-thought-of-saint-augustine.html

Can you explain more about how Fr. Feeney had Calvinistic leanings? I haven't head that before. I usually avoid discussions about Fr. Feeney, because I haven't studied much about him.

You haven't heard this because Papa doesn't know what he's talking about.  Father Feeney was no more Calvinist than St. Augustine was, with the latter rejecting Baptism of Desire in his later years due to his realization that it was implicitly Pelagian.  His suggestion that the anti-BoD position (held by a number of Church Fathers) is Calvinist actually sheds some light on his psychology, why he's so obsessed with promoting Baptism of Desire.

This man clearly has some major ax to grid against Feeneyism other than simply being against it.  Lover of Heresy was on the same crusade due to his having "almost been" converted to Feeneyism ... or something like that.