Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy  (Read 21754 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Papa Pius V

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 119
  • Reputation: +39/-129
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #45 on: February 04, 2021, 11:54:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are discussing a BOD, whatever that is, not Trent anyway. BODers necessarily MUST reject Trent, you are no different because you are a BODer.

    So why not simply give in and show us all your theological brilliance by actually answering the questions I asked.
    My "theological brilliance" lies in being a son of the Church following the Holy Fathers, Doctors, and theologians. I am slave of the Church. Not my own opinions like you.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46095
    • Reputation: +27153/-5013
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #46 on: February 04, 2021, 11:58:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Baptism of Desire is Catholic Doctrine. The necessity of the Catholic Faith for Salvation is also a certain Doctrine.

    Uhm, no, EENS is not merely "certain Doctrine" but is, rather, (thrice-)defined dogma.  So is, BTW, the necessity of the Sacrament of Baptism for salvation.  Any discussion of BoD must necessarily be articulated in a way that retains the Sacrament as the instrumental cause of justification.  90% of BoD theorists fail this test and in fact fall into heresy in their articulation of BoD.  90% of BoDers are Pelagians.

    BoD on the other hand is no dogma.  It's never been defined, and the proof for that is the half-dozen or so variants on it that you'll find among various BoD theorists.  If the Church has defined that it must be believed, then WHAT must be believed about it?  There's nothing more than a mere passing reference to it here or there in any Magisterial sources ... without any clear DEFINITION.  You can't claim that something must be believed when it's unclear WHAT must be believed about it.  Otherwise, to claim that someone believes in a BoD is just semantics and lip service.

    So the heretical impetus is clearly on the BoD side, with 90% of it undermining Catholic dogma, while BoD itself is nothing more than unrevealed theological speculation.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46095
    • Reputation: +27153/-5013
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #47 on: February 04, 2021, 11:58:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My "theological brilliance" lies in being a son of the Church following the Holy Fathers, Doctors, and theologians. I am slave of the Church. Not my own opinions like you.

    This is LoT speak for sure, elevating your own personal interpretation of Church teaching to being the same as the Church teaching itself.

    Offline Matto

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6882
    • Reputation: +3852/-406
    • Gender: Male
    • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #48 on: February 04, 2021, 12:00:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I am slave of the Church.
    You are not supposed to be a slave, but a son, and thus, an heir. A slave has no inheritance. (I know some speak of slavery to God, or slavery to the Blessed Virgin so I don't want to argue that point). But are you a slave to Pope Francis as a traditionalist who is not a sede?
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.

    Offline Papa Pius V

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 119
    • Reputation: +39/-129
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #49 on: February 04, 2021, 12:02:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is LoT speak for sure, elevating your own personal interpretation of Church teaching to being the same as the Church teaching itself.
    :facepalm:
    You have proven your inability to think and respond rationally numerous times.
    You're just being a troll at this point.


    Offline Papa Pius V

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 119
    • Reputation: +39/-129
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #50 on: February 04, 2021, 12:03:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are not supposed to be a slave, but a son, and thus, an heir. A slave has no inheritance. But are you a slave to Pope Francis as a traditionalist who is not a sede?
    I am a slave and a son of the Church. It is possible to be both; one in spritual inheritance and one in mindset.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14637
    • Reputation: +6027/-901
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #51 on: February 04, 2021, 12:10:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My "theological brilliance" lies in being a son of the Church following the Holy Fathers, Doctors, and theologians. I am slave of the Church. Not my own opinions like you.
    Says you, and only you and you fool only yourself papa. C'mon now, let's talk about what Trent teaches about the sacrament of baptism.....

    The Church condemns through Trent, whoever says the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation. Do you follow this or are you anathema?

    The Church condemns through Trent, whoever says that without the sacraments, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God the grace of justification. Do you follow this or are you anathema?

    Oh my look at that, more questions!....no matter, you cannot give answer anyway, perhaps there's an *honest* BODer lurking out there who will give answer.

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Papa Pius V

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 119
    • Reputation: +39/-129
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #52 on: February 04, 2021, 12:21:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Says you, and only you and you fool only yourself papa. C'mon now, let's talk about what Trent teaches about the sacrament of baptism.....

    The Church condemns through Trent, whoever says the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation. Do you follow this or are you anathema?

    The Church condemns through Trent, whoever says that without the sacraments, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God the grace of justification. Do you follow this or are you anathema?

    Oh my look at that, more questions!....no matter, you cannot give answer anyway, perhaps there's an *honest* BODer lurking out there who will give answer.
    Your user name suits you, Pope Stubborn I.


    Offline Nishant Xavier

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2873
    • Reputation: +1894/-1751
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #53 on: February 04, 2021, 12:30:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Quote Quote No, it's not.
    It certainly is, Stubborn. St. Alphonsus said it was de fide. Numerous Popes said Catholics may safely repeat any doctrine St. Alphonsus taught in the Moral Theology work where he said this.

    Quote
    Quote If you say that, without the sacraments, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification, I will let you be anathema as Trent directs.
    I believe and confess, as Trent teaches that, the Grace of Justification cannot be obtained through faith alone, without the Sacraments or without the desire of them. The Desire of both Baptism and Confession justifies.

    Ladislaus, Baptism of Desire is clearly taught in so many Catechisms, including the Baltimore Catechism, to be Love of God and Perfect Contrition, plainly based on Sacred Scripture. Our Lord clearly told the penitent Magdalene, weeping tears of contrition at His feet, that her sins were forgiven. The Church teaches that Perfect Contrition, in which the Desire for the Sacraments is implicit, immєdιαtely justifies souls and places them in the State of Grace, and therefore within the Church, even today. Cornelius also received the Holy Spirit before Baptism of Water, as both St. Augustine and St. Thomas (and Fr. Haydock) say. St. Thomas already before Trent had said Baptism is necessary in fact or in desire, and that this is the true interpretation of the dogma that has always prevailed in the Church. Trent clearly used voto in the context of both Baptism and Confession, and spoke of Sacraments in the plural (Baptism and Confession) of which the desire thereof obtains the Grace of Justification. Finally, Canon Law repeated that Baptism is necessary in fact or in desire. Which interpretation, yours or mine, is faithful to the canon of St. Vincent of Lerins?

    I will quote the Baltimore Catechism: "We know that Baptism of Desire will save us when it is impossible to receive Baptism of Water, from Holy Scripture, which teaches us that Love of God and Perfect Contrition secure the remission of sins" (from memory; I'll look up the source later on if you wish. You know as well as I do that it exists). Contrition is essentially supernatural, so your "Pelagian" objection is false. Are you accusing the Church of teaching Pelagianism, by the way? Even if you say you can disagree with the Magisterium where it is non-infallible, you must at a minimum do it respectfully to the Church, and ready to examine and revise your own view in light of Her clear Magisterial Teaching. Pope St. Pius X's Catechism also teaches the same, so this isn't a solitary thing.

    Do you deny what the Church says that Holy Scripture teaches or do you affirm it?

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14637
    • Reputation: +6027/-901
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The BODers
    « Reply #54 on: February 04, 2021, 03:26:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It certainly is, Stubborn. St. Alphonsus said it was de fide. Numerous Popes said Catholics may safely repeat any doctrine St. Alphonsus taught in the Moral Theology work where he said this.
    I do not believe you agree with St. Alphonsus.

    Knowing that a BOD is not a sacrament, the great saint said:

    "The heretics say that no sacrament is necessary, inasmuch as they hold that man is justified by faith alone, and that the sacraments only serve to excite and nourish this faith, which (as the heretics say) can be equally excited and nourished by preaching.  But this is certainly false, and is condemned in the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth canons:  for as we know from the Scriptures, some of the sacraments are necessary (necessitate Medii) as a means without which salvation is impossible. Thus Baptism is necessary for all, Penance for them who have fallen into sin after Baptism, and the Eucharist is necessary for all at least in desire". -
    From: (An Exposition and Defence of All the Points of Faith Discussed and Defined by the Sacred Council of Trent, Along With the Refutation of the Errors of the Pretended Reformers, Saint Alphonsus Liguori, Dublin, 1846.)

    Am I right, do you disagree with him here?


    Quote
    I believe and confess, as Trent teaches that, the Grace of Justification cannot be obtained through faith alone, without the Sacraments or without the desire of them. The Desire of both Baptism and Confession justifies.
    Sorry man, but this deserves a big :facepalm: How is it that BODers do not see that a BOD is justification by faith alone?

    Trent says if anyone saith that men obtain justification without the desire for the sacrament, let him be anathema.
    Trent NEVER says that *with* the desire, men obtain justification, only that without it there is no justification. Which means they purposely left the idea of justification via a desire up in the air. But they were quite clear on the necessity of the sacrament for salvation.

    So BODers cannot say honestly, that Trent teaches such a thing as, "with a desire men are justified", and to say a BOD saves is a blatant misquote of Trent. BODers, if they are going to quote Trent, must do so honestly and can only say "without the desire, men are not justified" - which means what it says. What you said in bold is your own opinion shared by others, even other great saints - but that is *not* what the Church infallibly taught at Trent.

    Which is to say the title of this thread should be changed to The Absurdity of the BODers
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Papa Pius V

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 119
    • Reputation: +39/-129
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The BODers
    « Reply #55 on: February 04, 2021, 03:41:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Which is to say the title of this thread should be changed to The Absurdity of the BODers
    Well it seems that one of the Mods granted that.
    Enjoy!


    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2486
    • Reputation: +990/-1099
    • Gender: Male
    Anyone can change the "title"
    « Reply #56 on: February 04, 2021, 03:56:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well it seems that one of the Mods granted that.
    Enjoy!
    Anyone can change the "title"
    Check it now.

    Editing the "subject" field when you post doesn't change the actual title, but it changes what shows up in recent posts. 

    Offline Papa Pius V

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 119
    • Reputation: +39/-129
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #57 on: February 04, 2021, 03:58:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Anyone can change the "title"
    Check it now.

    Editing the "subject" field when you post doesn't change the actual title, but it changes what shows up in recent posts.
    Very strange feature

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 11962
    • Reputation: +7517/-2254
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #58 on: February 04, 2021, 04:27:59 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    Please provide me a single reference of Fr. Feeney where he restricts his calling of BOD as heresy to the Cushingite understanding of it.

    It's common sense.  Fr Feeney lived in Boston, MA.  Cushing was bishop of Boston, MA.  Fr Feeney's SBC is near Boston, MA.  Fr Feeney was writing/preaching to those modernists "catholics" at Harvard U...which is near Boston, MA.  The entirety of Fr Feeney's work, his entire fight centered around Boston, MA. 
    .
    Those who think Fr Feeney was debating St Augustine, St Thomas, or whomever's BOD view just aren't putting Fr Feeney's books/comments in perspective.  Typical of lazy people.

    Offline Papa Pius V

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 119
    • Reputation: +39/-129
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
    « Reply #59 on: February 04, 2021, 04:31:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • It's common sense.  Fr Feeney lived in Boston, MA.  Cushing was bishop of Boston, MA.  Fr Feeney's SBC is near Boston, MA.  Fr Feeney was writing/preaching to those modernists "catholics" at Harvard U...which is near Boston, MA.  The entirety of Fr Feeney's work, his entire fight centered around Boston, MA.  
    .
    Those who think Fr Feeney was debating St Augustine, St Thomas, or whomever's BOD view just aren't putting Fr Feeney's books/comments in perspective.  Typical of lazy people.
    Wow. So in other words, its what you deduced.

    The man says he doesn't know what happens to Catechumens who die and you say that he wasn't debating a Thomistic BOD?  :confused: