Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy  (Read 32426 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #95 on: February 05, 2021, 02:28:15 PM »
Just always remember the quote. It helps BODers realize their iniquitous ways.

"There is no one about to die in the state of justification whom God cannot secure Baptism for, and indeed,
Baptism of Water..." - Fr. Feeney, "The greatest theologian in the Catholic Church today." — John Cardinal Wright
Just always remember:

Nor must it be thought that what is expounded in Encyclical Letters does not of itself demand consent, since in writing such Letters the Popes do not exercise the supreme power of their Teaching Authority. For these matters are taught with the ordinary teaching authority, of which it is true to say: "He who heareth you, heareth me"; and generally what is expounded and inculcated in Encyclical Letters already for other reasons appertains to Catholic doctrine. But if the Supreme Pontiffs in their official docuмents purposely pass judgment on a matter up to that time under dispute, it is obvious that that matter, according to the mind and will of the Pontiffs, cannot be any longer considered a question open to discussion among theologians.

Pope Pius XII

Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #96 on: February 05, 2021, 02:39:13 PM »
The only way to be a Feeneyite is to believe in double predestination.

Enjoy your Calvinism and/or Jansenism Stubby, Ladi, and Paxy. Its been good talking to you boys!


Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #97 on: February 05, 2021, 02:44:28 PM »
It is so simple when you here the Voice of Christ say..


“Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” John 3:5


And from the Church in the Nicene Creed said by the priest at Mass:

Confíteor unum baptísma in remissiónem peccatórum..

I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins..” 

According to Christ and The Church, there is only One Baptism, (not three) and it is with water and The Holy Ghost


The idea there is accidental death of God’s Elect without the Sacraments is just plain silly. 
God is, and always was, the Author of Life and Death, and it is He who grants the Sacrament of Baptism, to ALL of His Elect.. 

John 18:9

9That the word might be fulfilled which he said: Of them whom thou hast given me, I have not lost any one.

Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #98 on: February 05, 2021, 02:50:27 PM »
It is so simple when you here the Voice of Christ say..


“Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” John 3:5


And from the Church in the Nicene Creed said by the priest at Mass:

Confíteor unum baptísma in remissiónem peccatórum..

I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins..”

According to Christ and The Church, there is only One Baptism, (not three) and it is with water and The Holy Ghost


The idea there is accidental death of God’s Elect without the Sacraments is just plain silly.
God is, and always was, the Author of Life and Death, and it is He who grants the Sacrament of Baptism, to ALL of His Elect..

John 18:9

9That the word might be fulfilled which he said: Of them whom thou hast given me, I have not lost any one.
Who interprets the Bible?

Carissima or the Catholic Church?

Re: The Absurdities of The Feeneyite Heresy
« Reply #99 on: February 05, 2021, 03:03:17 PM »
Just always remember:

Nor must it be thought that what is expounded in Encyclical Letters does not of itself demand consent, since in writing such Letters the Popes do not exercise the supreme power of their Teaching Authority.

Pope Pius XII

Except for those encyclicals and teachings by Popes who I, Papa Pius V, as a non sedevacantist, accept as pope but disagree with. I do not consent to the teaching of those.

One problem with R&R is that it posits two kinds of Popes, the ones to be believed and the ones to be disbelieved. As a non-sede it is hard to argue honestly or consistently with those who treat all the popes the same and question all their teachings, or who put different Popes, such as Pius XII who you quote, into the category of popes to be disbelieved.