Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: St. John Vianney: Fr. Herman Cohen's Mother was Saved by Baptism of Desire!  (Read 3251 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nishant Xavier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2873
  • Reputation: +1894/-1751
  • Gender: Male
St. Alphonsus teaches it is de fide dogma that "souls are also saved by Baptism of Desire". The Church authorizes all to believe and teach this. If anyone has any doubt as to why the Church has this conviction, let them consult two great recent Priest-Saints.

(1) St. John Vianney taught that Fr. Herman Cohen's Mother was saved by Baptism of Desire, as other privileged souls later confirmed. (2) St. Padre Pio - whom even the Dimonds consider one of the Greatest Saints ever - taught Julius Fine was saved by Baptism of Desire

There are many other examples, and even one counter-example is sufficient to disprove a universal negative: "no soul is saved by Baptism of Desire" is disproved by a single counter-example. (3) St. Cyprian said those who came to the Church without Baptism would be saved, because the Lord would give them the Grace for it; (4) St. Ambrose said Valentian was saved, and prayed for him, showing Valentian was saved by BOD, not BOB, nor Water Baptism; (5) Pope Innocent III said a Priest who was invalidly Baptized was saved. The Pope then endorsed the opinions of St. Augustine and St. Ambrose on BOD, and commanded prayers and sacrifices for his soul.

St. Alphonsus cites this as proof that BOD saves souls, and like St. Ambrose and St. Thomas, teaches it remits guilt but not punishment. This follows from the fact that prayers are offered for them.

St. Padre Pio, Stigmatist-Priest, a real Shepherd of souls, a renewed proof to an unbelieving world that the Catholic Faith is the only true one, miracle-worker and Priest who prayed 30 ROSARY SETS (150 DECADES) every day, shows Baptism of Desire is Catholic Doctrine. Saints like Padre Pio pray all the time for their spiritual children, for the whole Church, and for everyone. The Church receives so many graces through their being crucified with Christ. Why would anyone trust blind guides like the Dimond over them?

St. Pio said: "Julius Fine is saved, but is necessary to pray much for him." Now, someone saved by a miraculous Water Baptism would not need many prayers, since Baptism remits all mortal and venial sins, eternal and temporal punishment. Thus, he was saved by BOD. BOD is Perfect Contrition, along with the Desire of the Sacraments, and remits mortal but not venial sins. It also remits the eternal punishment, placing a person in the State of Grace, but not necessarily all temporal punishment, as even Confession does not

The same for the person below, the Mother of Father Herman Cohen. Note that she converted to the Faith, and was saved by BOD.

From: http://papastronsay.blogspot.com/2011/10/text-of-letter-prophesied-to-father.html

Text of the letter prophesied to Father Hermann Cohen by the Curé of Ars.

Father Hermann Cohen's mother died
without receiving Holy Baptism.
In the eyes of the unwise
'she died as an unconverted Jewess'
in spite of the many prayers offered for her by her priestly son.

I have translated the following from his life
which will be of interest for all of us
who pray for souls that seem to live and die
without the grace of conversion.

Note that Fr. Hermann
had consecrated his mother to Our Lady
hundreds of times and offered many prayers for her salvation;
he never lost hope in his mother's cause.


Rev. Fr. Hermann Cohen, O.C.D.
The last moments for Mrs. Cohen arrived on 13 December 1855. Father Hermann was preaching Advent in Lyons at the time and he announced this sad news to his friend in these terms:

"God has struck a terrible blow to my heart. My poor mother is dead ... and I remain in incertitude! However we have so much prayed that we must hope that something has passed between her soul and God during these last moments that we cannot know about. ..."

We can easily imagine the pain of Father Hermann in learning of the death of his mother. He had so much prayed and so much had prayers said for her conversion, and she came to appear before the tribunal of God without having received holy Baptism! ...

" I also have a mother," would he write one day, "I have left her to follow Jesus Christ, she no longer calls me her 'good son'. Already her hair is silvered, already her brow is furrowed, and I am afraid to see her die. Oh! no I would not like to see her die before loving Jesus Christ, and already for many years I await for my mother that which Monica awaited for Augustine..."

God seemed to have despised all his prayers and rejected his loving and legitimate desires. His faith and his love were put through a harsh trial. Nevertheless, if his sorrow was deep, his hope in the infinite goodness of God would not allow itself to be struck down. ...
Saint Jean Marie Vianney
Curé of Ars
A short time later, he confided to the Curé of Ars his disquiet about the death of his poor mother who died without the grace of Baptism. "Hope!" replied the man of God, "hope; you will receive one day, on the feast of the Immaculate Conception a letter that will bring you great consolation."

Six years waiting.
These words were almost forgotten, when, on the 8th December 1861, six years after the death of his mother, a Father of the Company of Jesus handed to Father Hermann the following letter.

(The person who wrote this letter died in the odour of sanctity; she was well known in the religious and ascetical world by her written works on the Eucharist.)

The letter read:

On the 18th October, after Holy Communion, I found myself in one of those moments of intimate union with Our Lord, where he made me so feel his presence in the sacrament of His love that Faith seemed no longer necessary to believe him there.

After a short time, He had me hear His voice and He wanted to give me some explanations relative to a conversation that I had had the night before.

I remember that, in that conversation, one of my friends had manifested her surprise that Our Lord, who has promised to accord everything to prayer, had however remained deaf to those of Reverend Father Hermann who had so many times addressed Him to obtain the conversion of his mother; her surprise went almost as far as discontentment, and I had had difficulty in having her understand that we must adore the justice of God and not to seek to penetrate its secrets.

I dared to ask of my Jesus how it was that He, who was goodness itself, had been able to resist the prayers of Father Hermann, and not grant the conversion of his mother.


This was His (Our Lord's) response:

Why does Anna always want to sound the secrets of my justice and why does she seek to penetrate mysteries that she cannot comprehend?

Tell her that I do not owe my grace to anyone, that I give it to whom I please and that in acting in this way I do not cease to be just, and justice itself.

But that she may know that, rather than not keep the promises that I have made to prayer, I will upset heaven and earth, and that every prayer that has my glory and the salvation of souls for object is always heard when it is clothed in the necessary qualities.


He added: "And to prove to you this truth, I willingly make known that which passed at the moment of the death of the mother of Father Hermann".


My Jesus then enlightened me with a ray of His divine light and had me understand or rather to see in Him that which I want to try to relate.


At the moment where the mother of Father Hermann was on the point of rendering her last breath; at the moment that she seemed deprived of awareness, almost without life; Mary, our good Mother, presented Herself before Her Divine Son, and prostrate at His feet, She said to Him:
"Pardon and mercy, o my Son! for this soul who is going to perish. Yet another instant and she will be lost, lost for eternity. I beseech you, do for the mother of my servant Hermann, that which you would like to be done for your own, if She was in her place and if you were in his. The soul of his mother is his most precious good; he has consecrated her to me a thousand times; he has consecrated her to the tenderness and solicitude of my heart. Could I suffer her to perish? No, no, this soul is mine; I will it, I claim it as an inheritance, as the price of your blood and of my sufferings at the foot of your Cross."

Hardly had the sacred suppliant ceased speaking, when a strong, powerful grace, came forth from the source of all graces, from the adorable Heart of our Jesus, and came to enlighten the soul of the poor dying Jewess; instantly triumphing over her stubbornness and resistances.

This soul immєdιαtely turned herself with loving confidence towards Him whose mercy had persued her as far as the arms of death and said to Him: "O Jesus, God of the Christians, God whom my son adores, I believe, I hope in Thee, have pity on me."


In this cry, heard by God alone and which came from the intimate depths of the heart of the dying woman, were enclosed the sincere sorrow for her obstination and for her sins, the desire of baptism, the express will to receive it and to live according to the rules and precepts of our holy religion, if she had been able to return to life.

This leap of faith and hope in Jesus was the last sentiment of that soul; it was made at the moment when she brought towards the throne of the divine mercy. Breaking away the weak bonds which held her to her mortal casing, she fell at the feet of Him who had been her Saviour (a moment) before being her Judge."


After having showed me all these things, Our Lord added:

"Make this known to Father Hermann; it is a consolation that I wish to accord to his long sorrows, so that he will bless, and have blessed everywhere, the goodness of the heart of my Mother and Her power over mine."


Totally unknown to Reverend Father Hermann, the poor invalid who has just now penned these lines is happy to think that she has perhaps spread a little consolation and balm on the still bleeding wound of the heart of this son and priest. She dares to ask the alms of his fervent prayers, and she likes to believe that he will not refuse to one, who, even though unknown to him, is united to him by the sacred bonds of the same faith and of the same hopes. ..."


What appears to add great authority to this letter, is that it had been announced six years in advance by the venerable Cure of Ars.
End of translation.

(pp. 126 - 129, Vie du R.P. Hermann, en religion Augustine-Marie du T.S. Sacrament, Carme Dechausse, par M. l'Abbe Charles Sylvain, Paris, 1883.
From the French life of Rev. Father Hermann, in religion Augustin-Marie of the Most Holy Sacrament, Discalced Carmelite, by Fr. Canon Charles Sylvain, Paris 1883.)

Publised with the approbation of and recommendation of His Grandeur Mgr. gαy, Bishop of D'Anthedon, Auxiliary of His Eminence Cardinal Pie, Bishop of Poitier, 4 Dec. 1880
and of His Grace Mgr. de la Bouillerie, the Archbishop of Perga, Coadjutor of Bordeaux, 23 July 1881
of His Lordship Mgr. Adolphe-Louis Perraud, Bishop of Autun and Member of the French Academy, 8 March, 1882
and of the Most Reverend Father Luc of St. John of the Cross, Father General of the Discalced Carmelites, 4 May, 1880)


19 COMMENTS:


αnσnymσus said...
Wow! God's Mercy is truly infinite. What a fantastic story.

Gloria in excelsis Deo!

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Dorothy B said...
How beautiful! It makes me think of those among my own family who have left the Catholic Faith, and even the Christian faith. I pray for them, with tears as well as with words. I think it was St Pio who said we must pray, and hope, and never lose heart.
Saturday, October 15, 2011

Jack said...
\\I think it was St Pio who said we must pray, and hope, and never lose heart.\\

Jesus said this in Luke 18:1.

There is a verse in the Bible that says that mercy triumphs over judgement.

I can't find the verse, but we know from the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ that this is so.

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Anne B said...
Oh, the unfathomable depths of His Mercy!
Sunday, October 16, 2011

αnσnymσus said...
She died as an unconverted Jewess in spite of the many prayers offered for her by by her priestly son.

Too many Catholics today fail to see the plight of such a soul as cause for prayers and tears.

Thank you for sharing this remarkable story of faith and divine mercy.

David

Sunday, October 16, 2011

davidforster said...
Thank you for posting this, which is of great comfort to those of us who have family and friends who are apparently far from the church.

However, she did not 'die as an unconverted Jewess.' She appeared to do she. She in fact, unknown to the unwise, converted - we have the word of Our Lord through His mystic that this was true.

This private revelation supports baptism by desire. It does not support salvation of the unconverted.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Transalpine Redemptorists said...
@ Davidforster
Thank you. Point incorporated now.
Fr. MM

Sunday, October 16, 2011

αnσnymσus said...
I like the edited version of the introduction. It puts a fine point on the moral of the story, which is that we should neither presume too much nor too little on the mercy of God. To have been unconcerned for the soul of an "unconverted Jewess" while she lived would have been as unwise as to have presumed that she remained unconverted at the moment of death.

David

Sunday, October 16, 2011

αnσnymσus said...
From the Catholic Encyclopedia, it says...among his works five collections of 'sacred' songs with accompaniment, pious but somewhat shallow. This also holds good of his Mass (shallow). Can you explain WHAT is your point of favouring Jҽωs at the moment? At least have the decency to be true to yourselves and spit it out: You are NOT followers of Christ, but Anti-Christ Jҽωs.
Monday, October 17, 2011

Holly Hall said...
Thank you for giving me hope through this post. I will renew my efforts for my ex and his family, as well as my daughter, all of whom I have despaired of long ago, due to their obstinacy. Mary, Mother of Mercy, pray for us!
Monday, October 17, 2011

Transalpine Redemptorists said...
@ αnσnymσus

You will note by the references at the bottom of the post (in red) that distinguished churchmen faithful to the Church's tradition considered Reverend Father Cohen's life to be quite extraordinary.

You may also deduce that the Curé of Ars did not dismiss Father Cohen as you seem inclined to do.

What matters is not how you judge him or his mother, nor how you judge me; what matters dear friend is how you will yourself be judged.

We all stand before the gates of Eternity and we will, each of us, receive either God's mercy and heaven, or His Justice and the eternity of burning in the fires of hell with the devils and the damned.

St. Teresa thanked God that she would be judged by God and not by men. I too thank God that He in His omniscience will judge me; and that you will not be my judge on that momentous occasion.

I wish for you, the grace received by Mrs. Cohen:

That Our Lady will intercede for you, and that She will obtain for you a merciful judgment. That would be nice. You could then ask Mrs. Cohen herself why her story was posted at this moment; perhaps it was Providence that inspired it.

For myself, I posted this story for two reasons:

1) I have only found this story in French and I thought it worthwhile to translate it for our friends and families; to console them.

2) I translated it precisely because there are many souls for whom we pray, who seem to live and die as lost souls, leaving us no signs of final repentance.

The story of Mrs. Cohen is a reminder from heaven that we should not abandon any soul but that we should continue to pray for them in spite of the external circuмstances that look to be hopeless.

God bless you αnσnymσus,
May we meet in a blessed eternity, Adieu!

Monday, October 17, 2011

αnσnymσus said...
Arlene, the anti-Catholic mother of my friend Nena, is at this moment dying. This story is a huge consolation. Please, Dear Fathers and Readers, beg the grace of Arlene's conversion from the Immaculate Heart of Mary. A Green Scapular is near her. Please offer the prayer, "Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen." I will let you know when she passes.
Thank you, and God bless you!
Anna

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

αnσnymσus said...
I just found out that Arlene passed away last night without a priest. Please offer a prayer, and thank you.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011

αnσnymσus said...
For many years I have been praying for my husband's conversion to the Catholic faith. He was baptized in the protestant faith, but does not believe that Jesus is God because he thinks this is too fantastic. He prays the rosary with us every day, sometimes attends Mass and has taken us to various shrines...but he says it is impossible for him to believe in the divinity of Christ.
Please pray for Luiz.
JMJT
Thank you.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

kkr said...
I would be very interested in how one consecrates another to the Immaculate Heart of Mary? Is there an appropriate prayer?
May God bless you for your prayers you offer for all the holy souls.
Kim

Friday, October 21, 2011

David said...
I am from a Jєωιѕн background and pray every day for my father's conversion to the faith. I must admit that it angers me that ecuмenism since Vatican II has created a huge obstacle to his salvation by trying to hide the candle of truth under a bushel. There is but one true Church outside of which no-one can be saved.

The story of Rosalie Cohen shows that even up until the very last moment of life a person can be reconciled to God and added to His Mystical Body the Church.

I can only now trust in God's promises to prayer and take great comfort from what happened to Rosalie. Thank you, Father.

Friday, October 21, 2011

Anne (aussieannie) said...
Thank you for translating this wonderful story in English, it is a real grace!
Thursday, November 17, 2011

αnσnymσus said...
What a wonderful letter. My son would like to know if anyone knows the name of the nun who wrote the letter to Father Cohen. Thank you for your assistance.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Hidden One said...
Two excellent sermons about Fr. Cohen can be found online here:

http://www.audiosancto.org/sermon/20070218-Father-Augustine-Marie-of-the-Most-Blessed-Sacrament-part-1.html

http://www.audiosancto.org/sermon/20070225-Father-Augustine-Marie-of-the-Most-Blessed-Sacrament-part-2.html 

Offline Last Tradhican

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6293
  • Reputation: +3330/-1939
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Quote
    Xaviersem wrote : To your question, what I agree with is the below declaration by Bp. Athanasius and Cardinal Burke, which the SSPX has endorsed, : "“After the institution of the New and Everlasting Covenant in Jesus Christ, no one may be saved by obedience to the law of Moses alone without faith in Christ as true God and the only Savior of humankind” (Rom 3:28; Gal 2:16)."

    Last Tradhican asks for third time:
    I didn’t ask you what you agree with, I asked you : all I need to know is just if you reject these examples of salvation by implicit faith below , very simple, yes or no?

     
     Do you reject these examples of salvation by implicit faith, the teaching that non-Catholics can be saved by their belief in a god that rewards?
    :
     
     From the book  Against the Heresies, by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre:
     
     1. Page 216: “Evidently, certain distinctions must be made.  Souls can be saved in a religion other than the Catholic religion (Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism, etc.), but not by this religion.  There may be souls who, not knowing Our Lord, have by the grace of the good Lord, good interior dispositions, who submit to God...But some of these persons make an act of love which implicitly is equivalent to baptism of desire.  It is uniquely by this means that they are able to be saved.”
     
     2.Page 217: “One cannot say, then, that no one is saved in these religions…”
     
     Pages 217-218: “This is then what Pius IX said and what he condemned.  It is necessary to understand the formulation that was so often employed by the Fathers of the Church:  ‘Outside the Church there is no salvation.’  When we say that, it is incorrectly believed that we think that all the Protestants, all the Moslems, all the Buddhists, all those who do not publicly belong to the Catholic Church go to hell.  Now, I repeat, it is possible for someone to be saved in these religions, but they are saved by the Church, and so the formulation is true: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.  This must be preached.”
     
     Bishop Bernard Fellay, Conference in Denver, Co., Feb. 18, 2006: “We know that there are two other baptisms, that of desire and that of blood. These produce an invisible but real link with Christ but do not produce all of the effects which are received in the baptism of water… And the Church has always taught that you have people who will be in heaven, who are in the state of grace, who have been saved without knowing the Catholic Church. We know this. And yet, how is it possible if you cannot be saved outside the Church? It is absolutely true that they will be saved through the Catholic Church because they will be united to Christ, to the Mystical Body of Christ, which is the Catholic Church. It will, however, remain invisible, because this visible link is impossible for them. Consider a Hindu in Tibet who has no knowledge of the Catholic Church. He lives according to his conscience and to the laws which God has put into his heart. He can be in the state of grace, and if he dies in this state of grace, he will go to heaven.” (The Angelus, “A Talk Heard Round the World,” April, 2006, p. 5.)



    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Previously on at least two occasions, I made it clear to the writer my simple objective,

    Quote
    Last Tradhican asked: ....People's opinions are not so important to me. What is important is to pinpoint the big picture of what they believe. All I want to know is what you believe.
    In order to pinpoint what he believes I gave him clear examples of the theory of implicit faith and asked him if he rejects them. That's simple enough to answer.

    To those that think his response below indicates that he rejects the theories spelled out in the examples, I beg to differ. For the theory of salvation by implicit faith spelled out complete, teaches that by faith in a god that rewards, the believer implicitly believes in Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity. Therefore, the quote he posted below can be teaching salvation by implicit faith. I will correct it to show how the modernists sophists twist language to teach their errors. Until Xaviersem answers that he rejects the examples of salvation by implicit faith that I posted, we have no clue what he believes.


    Quote
    Xaviersem wrote: To your question, what I agree with is the below declaration by Bp. Athanasius and Cardinal Burke, which the SSPX has endorsed, and which I've promoted many times, including on CI: "“After the institution of the New and Everlasting Covenant in Jesus Christ, no one may be saved by obedience to the law of Moses alone without at least Implicit faith in Christ as true God and the only Savior of humankind” (Rom 3:28; Gal 2:16)."


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • I will correct it to show how the modernists sophists twist language in their minds to work their way around dogmas and teach their errors, while appearing to be totally orthodox.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46816
    • Reputation: +27685/-5139
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • (2) St. Padre Pio - whom even the Dimonds consider one of the Greatest Saints ever - taught Julius Fine was saved by Baptism of Desire


    Please cease your ridiculous overuse of the terms "teach" and "taught".  Padre Pio didn't "teach" anything.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46816
    • Reputation: +27685/-5139
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There are many other examples, and even one counter-example is sufficient to disprove a universal negative: "no soul is saved by Baptism of Desire" is disproved by a single counter-example. (3) St. Cyprian said those who came to the Church without Baptism would be saved, because the Lord would give them the Grace for it; (4) St. Ambrose said Valentian was saved, and prayed for him, showing Valentian was saved by BOD, not BOB, nor Water Baptism; (5) Pope Innocent III said a Priest who was invalidly Baptized was saved. The Pope then endorsed the opinions of St. Augustine and St. Ambrose on BOD, and commanded prayers and sacrifices for his soul.

    You persist in your lies even after having been corrected.  St. Cyprian rejected BoD; he believed in BoB but not BoD.  St. Ambrose did not teach that Valentinian was saved.  Innocent III expressed an opinion (assuming the letter attributed to him was even genuine, as it's disputed).  And St. Augustine rejected BoD.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46816
    • Reputation: +27685/-5139
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You cite Innocent III as the dogmatic source for BoD and then also cite St. Alphonsus' teaching that those saved through BoD experience Purgatory.

    But Innocent III elsewhere (dogmatically?) rejects the teaching of St. Alphonsus, which then by the same standard St. Alphonsus applied, must be considered heretical.

    Quote
    [one saved by BOD] would have rushed to his heavenly home without delay because of the faith of the sacrament, although not because of the sacrament of faith

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46816
    • Reputation: +27685/-5139
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • POPE INNOCENT II
     
    OBJECTION-  Pope Innocent II taught that a priest could be saved without the Sacrament of Baptism by his desire for it and his confession of the true faith (Denzinger 388): 
     
    To your inquiry we respond thus: We assert without hesitation (on the authority of the holy fathers Augustine and Ambrose) that the priest whom you indicated (in your letter) had died without the water of baptism, because he persevered in the faith of holy mother Church and in the confession of the name of Christ, was freed from original sin and attained the joy of the heavenly fatherland.  Read (brother) in the eighth book of Augustine’s City of God where, among other things it is written, ‘Baptism is ministered invisibly to one whom not contempt of religion but death excludes.’  Read again in the book of the blessed Ambrose concerning the death of Valentinian where he says the same thing.  Therefore, to questions concerning the dead, you should hold the opinions of the learned Fathers, and in your church you should join in prayers and you should have sacrifices offered to God for the priest mentioned (Apostolicam Sedem).”
     
    ANSWERFirst of all, there is no such thing as a priest who has not been baptized.  The Church teaches that one who has not been baptized cannot receive the priesthood validly.  This problem alone demonstrates that the above statement is not infallible.  Secondly, the date of this docuмent is unknown, the author is unknown – it is by no means clear that it was Innocent II – and the person to whom it is addressed is unknown!  Could such a docuмent ever prove anything?  No.  It remains a mystery why a docuмent of such doubtful authenticity found its way into Denzinger, a handbook of dogmatic statements.  This is probably because Denzinger was edited by Karl Rahner, a notorious heretic, whose heretical bias caused him to present this clearly non-magisterial statement as Magisterial, for he is a believer in baptism of desire.
     
         To illustrate the lack of magisterial authority of the previous letter allegedly from Pope Innocent II, I will quote from Thomas Hutchinson’s book, Desire and Deception (pp. 31-32):
     
    “We speak of the letter Apostolicam Sedem, written at the behest of Pope Innocent II (1130-1143), at an unknown date to an unnamed bishop of Cremona.  The latter had written an inquiry to the Pope regarding the case of a priest who apparently had died without being baptized.  Of course, it has been defined that, in such a case, he was no priest, since the sacrament of orders may only be conferred validly upon the baptized.
                 
               ---- Text of letter omitted because it has been listed already ----
        
         “Now, there are more than a few problems connected with this letter.  Firstly, it depends entirely on the witness of Saints Ambrose and Augustine for its conclusion.  Its premises are false, as the Fathers in question did not actually hold the opinions herein imputed to them.  (author: as noted a mere sentimental speculative utterance does not prove they hold to this as official teaching)…
         “Lastly, there is even a question of who wrote this letter.  Many authorities ascribe it to Innocent III (1198-1216).  This question is mentioned in Denzinger.  The letter is certainly not in keeping with the totality of his declarations either.  In any case, a gap of 55 years separated the two pontificates.  So a private letter of uncertain date, authorship, and destination, based upon false premises and contradicting innumerable indisputably valid and solemn docuмents, is pretended to carry the weight of the Magisterium on its shoulders.  Were any other doctrine concerned, this missive (letter) would not even be given any consideration.  As we shall see, however, mystification and deception are part and parcel of the history of this topic of Salvation.  Perhaps this letter was attributed to Innocent III because of his statement that the words of consecration at Mass do not actually have to be said by the priest, but only thought internally --- a sort of Eucharist by Desire.  Later Saint Thomas Aquinas took him to task on this point.
         “But Innocent III is indeed the key to understanding the original teaching of the Church on this topic.  It was in his time (as always until the Second Plenary Council of Baltimore) forbidden to bury the unbaptized (whether catechumens or even children of Catholic parents) in consecrated ground.  He explained the rationale for this law, writing:  ‘It has been decreed by the sacred canons that we are to have no communion with those who are dead, if we have not communicated with them while alive’ (Decr. III, XXVIII, xii).”  - end of transcript from Desire and Deception.
     

         These considerations dismiss any argument in favor of baptism of desire from this letter.  The letter, while certainly not infallible, may indeed be a forgery. 


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46816
    • Reputation: +27685/-5139
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You also lie in claiming that St. John Vianney "taught" anything.

    Allegedly he simply told someone Fr. that he would receive a letter that would console him.

    Allegedly this letter was written by some unknown alleged mystic.

    Nowhere did St. John Vianney endorse its contents, if it even existed, but merely said that Fr. would be "consoled" by it ... which he was (allegedly).

    This proves something?

    As with any popular saint, thousands of apocryphal sayings are alleged of them, most of which are completely made up.  There are many such attributed to Padre Pio that have been debunked as false.

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • All the copy and paste material from Xaviersem has been answered years ago ad-nauseum, it is old material. Been there seen that (10+ years on CI) and answered it more than enough times. Today, I only look at the big picture, what does the person believe? I have spelled out what I believe, and I do not care if someone else wants to believe otherwise, at least after I have explained my position simply. Why do people like XavierSem and Lover of Truth (his predecessor, who wrote 10x what Xaviersem has and was totally refuted in every detail) feel obligated to create hundreds of threads about the ways that non-Catholics can be saved? After many years at this I have concluded that they feel rebuked in their real belief that anyone can be saved by God in the last seconds when He appears to them. I have never seen a strict Thomist post about his harmless belief that a catechumen can be saved by BOD. It is always the false BODers, fake Thomists, that start and proliferate these never ending  threads.

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 9369
    • Reputation: +9165/-891
    • Gender: Male
    Re: St. John Vianney: Fr. Herman Cohen's Mother was Saved by Baptism of Desire!
    « Reply #10 on: February 18, 2021, 11:38:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Excerpt from XavierSem's post:  
    This leap of faith and hope in Jesus was the last sentiment of that soul; it was made at the moment when she brought towards the throne of the divine mercy. Breaking away the weak bonds which held her to her mortal casing, she fell at the feet of Him who had been her Saviour (a moment) before being her Judge."


    Okay,understand that it is through God's grace which allows for the conversion of Hearts.
    So she converted at the last minute and wanted Baptism?  No mention of that in the account?

    But she had the energy to fall down on her knees.  

    Did Our Lord Baptize her at this moment?  He certainly could have.

    In Mother Mary's miraculous conversion of the Jew, Alphonse Ratisbonne, the very first thing he requested when getting-up off his knees in front of Our Lady was a Water Baptism.



    On final comment:  If as you say, it took years of prayers from her Holy religious son to bring our Lady's intercession on such a perfidious soul, how unlikely is it that millions of other souls who do not believe, who have no rigorous prayers, who lack water Baptism, can so easily acquire it?

    Can you for one moment consider the political correctness that BOD and BOB provide to the perfidious Jҽωs and the non Catholic world?

    BOB and BOD ultimately mean, "We don't need to be a member of the Catholic Church!"

    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
    Re: St. John Vianney: Fr. Herman Cohen's Mother was Saved by Baptism of Desire!
    « Reply #11 on: February 18, 2021, 11:43:54 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Old posting of mine:

    Millions of examples of people miraculously hanging on to life, then they are baptized and die. 100's of examples of people being raised from the dead just to be baptized, here's a few examples:

    From : Peter Claver: Saint of the Slaves, by Fr. Angel Valltiera, S.J., Burns and Oates, London, 1960, pp. 221,222.:

    "The affair of the slave Augustina, who served in the house of Captain Vincente de Villalobos, was one of the strangest in the life of Claver...When Augustina was in her last agony Villalobos went in search of Claver. When the latter arrived the body was already being prepared for the shroud and he found it cold to the touch. His expression suddenly changed and he amazed everyone by crying aloud, "Augustina, Augustina." He sprinkled her with holy water, he knelt by her, and prayed for an hour. Suddenly the supposedly dead woman began to move...All fell on their knees. Augustina stared at Claver, and as if awakening from a deep sleep said, "Jesus, Jesus, how tired I am!" Claver told her to pray with all her heart and repent her sins, but those standing by, moved by curiosity, begged him to ask her where she came from. He did so, and she said these words: "I am come from journeying along a long road. It was a beautiful road, and after I had gone a long way down it I met a white man of great beauty who stood before me and said, 'Stop, you cannot go further.' I asked him what I should do, and he replied, 'Go back the way you have come, to the house you have left.' This I have done, but I cannot tell how." On hearing this Claver told them all to leave the room and leave him alone with her because he wished to hear her confession. He prepared her and told her that complete confession of her sins was of immense importance if she wanted to enter that paradise of which she had had a glimpse. She obeyed him, and as he heard her confession it became clear to Claver that she was not baptized. He straightway ordered water to be brought, and a candle and a crucifix. Her owners answered that they had had Augustina in their house for twenty years and that she behaved in all things like themselves. She had gone to confession, to Mass, and performed all her Christian duties, and therefore she did not need Baptism, nor could she receive it. But Claver was certain that they were wrong and insisted, baptizing her in the presence of all, to the great delight of her soul and his, for a few minutes after she had received the sacraments she died in the presence of the whole family."  

    22 Peter Claver: Saint of the Slaves, Fr. Angel Valltiera, S.J., Burns and Oates, London, 1960, pp. 221,222.

    St. Vincent Ferrer –
     There was a rich Jew of Andalusia, named Abraham, who began to leave a church in anger while Vincent was preach-ing. The Jew did not like what he was hearing. As some peo¬ple at the door opposed his passing through, St. Vincent cried out:
    "Let him go! Come away all of you at once, and leave the passage free!" The people did as he ordered, and at the instant the Jew left, part of the porch structure fell on him and crushed him to death. Then the saint rose from his chair and went to the body. He knelt there in prayer. Abraham came to life, and his first words were: "The religion of the Jҽωs is not the true faith. The True Faith is that of the Christians."
      
      In memory of this event the Jew was baptized Elias (in honor of the prophet who had raised the boy from the dead). The new convert established a pious foundation in the church of the "accident" and the miracle. Bishop Peter Ranzano's account was used for this version of the miracle.
      
     
    St. Patrick –
     In the country of Neyll, a King Echu allowed St. Patrick to receive his beloved daughter Cynnia as a nun, though he bewailed the fact that his royal line would thereby end without issue.  The king exacted a promise from Patrick not to insist that he be baptized, yet to promise him the heavenly kingdom.  Patrick agreed, and left the matter in the hands of God.
     
     Sometime later King Echu lay dying.  He sent a messenger to St. Patrick to tell him he desired Baptism and the heavenly kingdom.  To those around him the King gave an order that he not be buried until Patrick came.  Patrick, then in the monastery of Saballum, two days' journey away, knew of the situation through the Holy Spirit before the messenger even arrived.  He left to go to the King, but arrived to find Echu dead.
     
     St. Patrick revived the King, instructed him, and baptized him.  He asked Echu to relate what he had seen of the joys of the just and the pains of the wicked, so that his account could be used for the proving of Patrick's preaching.  Echu told of many other-world wonders and of how, in the heavenly country, he had seen the place that Patrick promised him.  But the King could not enter in because he was unbaptized.
     
     Then St. Patrick asked Echu if he would rather live longer in this world, or go to the place prepared for him in the heavenly kingdom.  The King answered that all the world had was emptiest smoke compared to the celestial joys.  Then having received the Eucharist, he fell asleep in the Lord.
     

     St. Joan of Arc prays and brings a dead baby back to life so that it might be baptized. -Baby said to have been dead for 3 days
      In the Spring of 1430, Joan had just arrived in Lagny-sur-Marne, France, where she was to lead the French forces there against the English. It was there, in the midst of war, that the miracle occurred.
      
      According to her own testimony, she was called upon to join some other young women who were praying in a Church beseeching God and the Blessed Virgin Mary on behalf of a dead baby, that it might be revived long enough to baptize it. Here is Joan's own testimony
     
      
    "I was told that the girls of the town were gathered before the statue of our Lady and wanted me to come and pray to God and our Lady to bring a baby back to life. So I went and prayed with the others. And finally life appeared in him, and he yawned three times. Then he was baptized, and soon afterwords he died, and was buried in consecrated ground.
     
      For three days, I was told, he had shown no signs of life, and he was as black as my jacket. But when he yawned his color began to come back. And I was on my knees there with the other girls, praying before our Lady."

     

     Father Point 
      Fr. Point, S.J. was a fellow Jesuit Missionary to the Indians with Fr. De Smet in the 19th century. He tells a very interesting story about the miraculous resuscitation for baptism of a person who had been instructed in the Faith but apparently died without receiving the sacrament.

     Father Point, S.J., quoted in The Life of Fr. De Smet, pp. 165-166  >
      "One morning, upon leaving the Church I met an Indian woman, who said: ‘So-and-so is not well.’ She (the person who was not well) was not yet a catechumen and I said I would go to see her. An hour later the same person (who came and told him the person is not well), who was her sister, came to me saying she was dead. I ran to the tent, hoping she might be mistaken, and found a crowd of relatives around the bed, repeating, 'She is dead – she has not breathed for some time.' To assure myself, I leaned over the body; there was no sign of life. I reproved these excellent people for not telling me at once of the gravity of the situation, adding,

     
     'May God forgive me!’ Then, rather impatiently, I said, 'Pray!' and all fell on their knees and prayed devoutly.
     
     "I again leaned over the supposed corpse and said, 'The Black Robe is here: do you wish him to baptize you?' At the word baptism I saw a slight tremor of the lower lip; then both lips moved, making me certain that she understood. She had already been instructed, so I at once baptized her, and she rose from her bier, making the sign of the cross. Today she is out hunting and is fully persuaded that she died at the time I have recounted."
     
     
     
     Saint Francis De Sales, died 1622 A.D. >
      In the life of St. Francis De Sales we also find a child miraculously raised from the dead specifically for the Sacrament of Baptism.

     "A baby, the child of a heretic mother, had died without baptism. St. Francis had gone to speak to the mother about Catholic doctrine, and prayed that the child would be restored to life long enough to receive Baptism. His prayer was granted, and the whole family became Catholic."



     
      Saint Stephen, died c. 33 A.D. (through his intervention) >
      "At Uzale, a woman had an infant son… Unfortunately, he died before they had time to baptize him. His mother was overwhelmed with grief, more for his being deprived of Life Eternal than because he was dead to her. Full of confidence, she took the dead child and publicly carried him to the Church of St. Stephen, the first martyr. There she commenced to pray for the son she had just lost. Her son moved, uttered a cry, and was suddenly restored to life. She immєdιαtely brought him to the priests; and, after receiving the Sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation, he died anew."



    Offline Nishant Xavier

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2873
    • Reputation: +1894/-1751
    • Gender: Male
    Re: St. John Vianney: Fr. Herman Cohen's Mother was Saved by Baptism of Desire!
    « Reply #12 on: February 18, 2021, 11:46:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks, Pope Ladislaus. I guess since you've infallibly pronounced on the subject of St. Cyprian's opinions, no dissent whatsoever from your ex cathedra declarations can be permitted. Right? :) C'mon. I disagree with your claim about him, that's all. Let me explain why.

    I think you may not have read this full text of St. Cyprian. I was speaking of the latter portion: "22. On which place some, as if by human reasoning they were able to make void the truth of the Gospel declaration, object to us the case of catechumens; asking if any one of these, before he is baptized in the Church, should be apprehended and slain on confession of the name, whether he would lose the hope of salvation and the reward of confession, because he had not previously been born again of water? Let men of this kind, who are aiders and favourers of hereticsknow therefore, first, that those catechumens hold the sound faith and truth of the Church, and advance from the divine camp to do battle with the devil, with a full and sincere acknowledgment of God the Father, and of Christ, and of the Holy Ghost; then, that they certainly are not deprived of the sacrament of baptism who are baptized with the most glorious and greatest baptism of blood, concerning which the Lord also said, that He had another baptism to be baptized with. But the same Lord declares in the Gospel, that those who are baptized in their own blood, and sanctified by suffering, are perfected, and obtain the grace of the divine promise, when He speaks to the thief believing and confessing in His very passion, and promises that he should be with Himself in paradise. Wherefore we who are set over the faith and truth ought not to deceive and mislead those who come to the faith and truth, and repent, and beg that their sins should be remitted to them; but to instruct them when corrected by us, and reformed for the kingdom of heaven by celestial discipline.

    23. But some one says, What, then, shall become of those who in past times, coming from heresy to the Church, were received without baptismThe Lord is able by His mercy to give indulgence, and not to separate from the gifts of His Church those who by simplicity were admitted into the Church, and in the Church have fallen asleep." https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050672.htm St. Cyprian's answer suggests he believed the Grace of Baptism would be given to them, though he believed they were without Baptism.

    The excerpt from "Desire and Deception" is thoroughly ridiculous and is nothing more than the author's uninformed opinion. 

    Pope Innocent III approved the teachings of St. Augustine and St. Ambrose as being in favor of Baptism of Desire.

    The author tries in vain to deny or minimize this brute fact. A Priest invalidly baptized would not have received the Character of the other Sacraments. It doesn't follow that he was deprived of the necessary Graces of Baptism, in particular Justification, to be saved.

    Next, you missed this from Pope Innocent III: "Therefore, to questions concerning the dead, you should hold the opinions of the learned Fathers, and in your church you should join in prayers and you should have sacrifices offered to God for the priest mentioned (Apostolicam Sedem).”

    Why prayers and sacrifices? Because the person received justification through BOD, but needed prayers to be saved. You didn't answer many of my questions on the other thread regarding this.

    1. Why did St. Ambrose pray for Valentian's Soul, if he was saved by BOB or Water Baptism? 
    2. You claimed post-Tridentine manuals called BOD "a disputed question". Where are they?

    Your interpretation of the other passage is your own misunderstanding, None of the Doctors understand it that way. 

    St. Padre Pio and St. John Vianney are witnesses to the fact that BOD can save no matter your semantics over "taught".

    You BOD-deniers have nothing and you cite nothing. You just give a long list of excuses as to why everyone except you are mistaken.

    We Catholics who believe in BOD, Perfect Contrition and Spiritual Communion stand with Trent, the Popes, the Catechisms, the Manuals, the Doctors, the Saints, the Fathers, the Scriptures and all of Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium of the Church.

    You stand on the word of two misguided monks, who think they've discovered a new "heresy" in Trent. Blind guides of the blind.

    Edit: Yes, Incredulous, one has to convert to the Catholic Faith, at least in the hour of death, in order to be saved.

    I was just done with this post before I saw your reply. I will post Fr. Mueller, in a Catechism approved by Rome, later on.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46816
    • Reputation: +27685/-5139
    • Gender: Male
    Re: St. John Vianney: Fr. Herman Cohen's Mother was Saved by Baptism of Desire!
    « Reply #13 on: February 18, 2021, 11:50:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • alleged story:

    Quote
    Florence Fine Herman in 1965 asked Padre Pio to pray for her father who had terminal ALS. He promised to take him under his protection. He was a devout Jew. Two years later he died. She was told by friends that without baptism one cannot be saved. She went back to Padre Pio with a heavy heart. She took the courage to ask: “Where is my father?” Padre Pio replied: “Julius Fine is saved. But we need to pray a lot for him.”

    If I had a dollar or every fake saying or story attributed to Padre Pio, I could retire.  These friends who told her that "without baptism one cannot be saved" were correct.  I'm actually surprised anyone still believed that in 1965.

    In any case, all we have is a third-hand report of something that Florence Herman claimed that Padre Pio said to her privately.

    This Xavier characterizes as a "teaching" of Padre Pio.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46816
    • Reputation: +27685/-5139
    • Gender: Male
    Re: St. John Vianney: Fr. Herman Cohen's Mother was Saved by Baptism of Desire!
    « Reply #14 on: February 18, 2021, 11:55:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You'll notice, Xavier, that St. Cyprian is referring to Baptism of Blood.  Notice also that he says that such a one is not deprived of the SACRAMENT of Baptism.  Later BoD theorists claim that he was in error.  But elsewhere St. Cyprian speaks of martyrs as having had their blood replace water and the angels pronouncing the words of Baptism.  He considered martyrdom to be a mystical celebration of the SACRAMENT and not as any exception to the necessity of Baptism.