CathInfo.com

To be frank, I mentioned the subject in passing and this isn't a central claim. I do not know how to differentiate the calumnies on Fr Feeney from the truth, I will stay neutral on the subject for now and put it in the list of things I need to study.

The only thing I know with absolute certainty and there is no debate at all on the question is that his position is false, according to people far more qualified than he was.

Attached is a book on the subject worth reading. The first two paragraphs of the Introduction sums up the whole episode imo.

I am still waiting for you to search the word "aut" in a latin dictionary and tell me what you find.

You are so prideful you think someone with two doctorates and fluent latin knows less than you do about Trent. This is absolutely pathetic and ridiculous, you have forgotten your place in society, and it is a very small place far below that of St Alphonsus.

Show me in Trent where it lays out the requirements for BOD.  Hint: It doesn't.  Ergo, St Alphonsus' OPINIONS on the requirement for a "perfect act of contrition" are just that, an OPINION.  Because NOWHERE does Trent tell us (i.e. Church Authority) how, when, to whom, and by what means, does BOD apply to a particular person.

St Thomas says explicit faith is necessary in the Incarnation/Trinity.  
St Bellarmine doesn't give any details.
St Alphonsus says an implicit faith is adequate (but does not mention the Incarnation/Trinity) and then says that a "perfect act of contrition" is necessary.

So all 3 of these Doctors' views differ.  You don't see a problem with that?  I do.  It's a MAJOR PROBLEM.  If BOD were a doctrine, then all of these people would AGREE ON THE DETAILS.

Do the catechisms provide the bridge?  No, they offer the same ambiguous notion.  No details.  Some catechisms even are MORE AMBIGUOUS, talking about implicit faith, etc.  All of this contradicts St Thomas.

So where, in the entire catholic world, is there ONE SOURCE to tell ANYONE how, to whom, when, where and why BOD works?  Hint: It doesn't exist.

Ergo, BOD is a theory.  Might be as close to doctrine-without-being-doctrine as you can get, but doctrines don't have unanswered questions.  BOD does.  A lot of them.

Can you provide any post where I lied?

Otherwise, calumny is a mortal sin and you have just sentenced yourself to death with your own mouth.

Pretty much you can pick anyone of your posts, here's one.

1) I do not deny explicit teachings of popes, but you do.

2) You say the Church teaches "of BOD/BOB (which apply only in extremely rare and specific circuмstances)" - which is a complete and total lie. You will NEVER find any official teaching of the Church that uses either term or even mentions a "Baptism of Desire" or "a Baptism of Blood" BECAUSE the Church does not teach them, the Church teaches the sacraments are necessary unto salvation, and the Church teaches whoever says otherwise is anathema - which makes you anathema.

So there's two lies I picked at random - your posts are full of 'em.