And how can we judge him without knowing the full story or what was happening behind the scenes?
According to his acts in the external forum. And according to the dogmas that Sweden just posted, which you have to DENY in order to believe that God might occasionally do something that HE SAID HE WILL NOT DO.
Sweden, even the so-called '1917 Code of Canon Law' promulgated by your 'pope' Benedict XV teaches that a person is to be judged by their acts in the external forum and guilt is to be presumed until innocence is proven.
Positing an external violation of the law, dolus [evil will] in the external forum is presumed until the contrary is proven.
The Dimonds are utterly inconsistent. According to 'Canon Law' it is illicit to presume innocence when the law is violated, and at least you realize that publicly teaching baptism of desire IS such a violation, and HE NEVER RETRACTED to prove his innocence.
Yes the Dimonds claim to have refuted me, but I told you I updated all my articles after listening to their 'refutation'.