What I have learned from studying (mostly mhfm's site) is...
So, your magister is a group of kleptomaniac non-monks? Wise choice.
At least they adhere to Church magesteriums teaching and dogmatic definitions. Many of traditional catholics either completely deny the dogmatic definitions or give them other meanings besides from what they actually say. Baptism of blood and baptism of desire are completely false and rejected with the dogmatic definitions on baptism, yet how many false Catholics disregard this, rejects dogmas, and follow their own faith and mind?
Yet I have failed to see them teach anything wrong or against the real Catholic Faith. Not that I know much of the Catholic Faith. But to know that accepting the Church dogmas, is to accept the Faith, is enough for me to know. Therefore, anyone teaching contrary to dogma, is wrong, such as bod & bob activists, since dogmas refutes their position, yet they obstinately hold on to their false believes, embracing all kinds of heresies, as salvation outside the Church, for people rejecting Christ, etc...
Whats your opinion on this? Should we not adhere to Church dogmatic definitions? If so, why then not learn from most holy family, when they teach according to the Church teachings?