Leaving aside the argument of John's bad will, I'm still curious about the original video.
I mean explicit BOD and implicit BOD are different issues, and I get that most Feeneyites don't mind explicit BOD very much, but it still seems relevant whether or not that's error.
There are also different levels of "implicit".
Explicit: I want to become a Catholic and want to be baptized.
Implicit 1: I want to become a Catholic (implicit want to be baptized).
Implicit 2: I want to do God's will (implicit want to become a Catholic, since it's what God wills, and implicit want to be baptized, since it's what God wills).
Implicit 3: I'm a nice guy doing the best I can (implicit want to do God's will ... the rest as in Implicit 2).
Most people believe in Implicit 3 today.
As seen by how it could lead to #3, this notion of "implicit" is one of the most dangerous in all of Catholic theology, being exploited to no end by enemies of the faith to undermine Catholic dogma.
Implicit 2 lines up with Rewarder God theory and didn't exist before that was invented by a couple of Jesuits around 1600.
Implicit 1 (and Explicit of course) requires explicit faith in the core Catholic dogmas.
Implicit 3 opens things up even to atheists, or even to, hypothetically, those who believe that God rewards the wicked and punishes the just ... like the Aztecs and worshippers of Baal or even Satanists.