The Council of Trent
Seventh Session: On The Sacraments in General
IV.-If any one saith, that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation, but superfluous; and that, without them, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification;-though all (the sacraments) are not indeed necessary for every individual; let him be anathema.
If a person receives the grace of justification and dies in that grace without receiving water Baptism where does his soul go? Heaven or Hell?
To exemplify what Cantarella stated, you need to read the canon as it is written and it would certainly help to understand the purpose the canon was decreed at all.
The first part of the canon:
If any one saith, that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation, but superfluous;..........let him be anathema.ALL NSAAers ignore, reject or otherwise completely miss the first and most important part of the canon above.
It then goes on:
and [if anyone saith] that, without them, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification;-though all (the sacraments) are not indeed necessary for every individual; let him be anathema.Note the fact that unlike the first part of the canon - and much to the shame of deceitful NSAAers, nowhere in this second part of the canon is salvation ever even mentioned. Rewarding salvation to infidels is an additional leap they make so they may proclaim the sacrament is not necessary, only the desire of it is.
Where the requirement for salvation *is* mentioned and rejected by NSAAers, is in the first part - this requirement really irks the deceitful NSAAers because they cannot make it jive with their adulterating of the rest of the canon without deceiving themselves - and all others of weak or no faith.
The words "desire thereof" appear two whole times in all of the Council's docuмents - and out of all the teachings to the contrary, NSAAers zoom into those two words and heretically declare, profess, proclaim and defend those two words as dogmatic proof that salvation is rewarded by some desire for the sacrament.
If you read the canon as written, you will find that:
1) The sacraments are necessary unto salvation. (NSAAers cannot stand this fact)
2) Per Trent's catechism explaining the "desire thereof":
In the first place they must desire and intend to receive it; for as in Baptism we all die to sin and resolve to live a new life, it is fit that it be administered to those only who receive it of their own free will and accord; it is to be forced upon none.3) NSAAers who preach a BOD are preaching in exact contradiction of the entire canon since NSAAers preach that without the sacraments, men obtain from God - not the grace of justification, no, that does not suit their purpose - they go all the way and proclaim that without them men obtain from God *salvation* - and that no sacrament at all is indeed necessary for any individual at all.