Oh, it's more than uncharitable to Pope Pope Pius IX ... it's downright slander and it makes him out to be a Pelagian.  We'll need to find the article (I forgot who wrote it it .... might even have been Fr. Feeney) where it docuмents the reaction of Pope Pius IX to these slanders.  To say that someone could be save MERELY due to lack of actual sin, that not being punished suffices for salvation ... THAT IS PELAGIAN HERESY.  Period.  Invincible ignorance and lack of actual sin are MERELY EXCULPATORY but CANNOT BE SALVIFIC.  In order for salvation to be possible, supernatural faith is required (dogmatically taught by Trent, so this interpretation is herestic on those grounds as well).  And that is where "divine light and grace" factor in.  What Pius IX is saying is not Pelagian heresy, but that God WILL provide His divine light and grace for salvation to those who are invincibly ignorant and who have committed no actual sin.  This is precisely what St. Thomas taught.  Pope Pius IX does not specific HOW God might provide the divine light and grace, whether by some interior illumination or, as St. Thomas taught, by sending an angel from Heaven to communicate those truths that must be explicitly believed for salvation, which St. Thomas held to be at minimum the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation.  But the perinacious Pelagian heretic here (trying to smear Pope Pius IX with his own heresies) believes that ignorance and lack of actual sin can actually be salvific, that invincible ignorance can save ... and not a few Trad clergy have actually muttered this heretical absurdity.  That's tantamount to a denial of Original Sin, since the Church teaches that you cannot be saved even if you have Original Sin alone (without having committed actual sin), and again that you must have supernatural faith in order to be saved (dogmatically taught at Trent and many other places), and the minimum truths necessary to be believed explicitly in order to even make supernatural faith possible are the core mysteries regarding the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation.

In those docuмents, Pius IX is consistently saying three things:

1. He is referring to souls that die in their "ignorance of the true religion."

2. He is saying that these ignorant souls are "outside of the Church."

3. He is saying that EENS does not apply to those with "invincible ignorance about our most holy religion."

Granted that everyone is bound to believe something explicitly, no untenable conclusion follows even if someone is brought up in the forest or among wild beasts. For it pertains to divine providence to furnish everyone with what is necessary for salvation, provided that on his part there is no hindrance. Thus, if someone so brought up followed the direction of natural reason in seeking good and avoiding evil, we must most certainly hold that God would either reveal to him through internal inspiration what had to be believed, or would send some preacher of the faith to him as he sent Peter to Cornelius (Acts 10:20).  Although it is not within our power to know matters of faith by ourselves alone, still, if we do what we can, that is, follow the guidance of natural reason, God will not withhold from us that which we need.

At no point does he say "EENS does not apply", you filthy liar.

Hence, too,that meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be maintained which has once been declared by holy mother church, and there must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding.

I, Pius, bishop of the catholic church, with firm faith believe and profess each and every article contained in the profession of faith which the holy Roman church uses
[...]
that
there are seven sacraments of the new law,
truly and properly so called,
instituted by our lord Jesus Christ and
necessary for salvation
[...]
This true catholic faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold, is what I shall steadfastly maintain and confess, by the help of God, in all its completeness and purity until my dying breath, and I shall do my best to ensure that all others do the same. This is what I, the same Pius, promise, vow and swear. So help me God and these holy gospels of God

Angelus, EENS is a doctrine.  

No, Pius IX most certainly does not teach Pelagian heresy, you filthy scuм ... but you attribute Pelagian heresy to Him.

You inject your [by way of Natural Law] interpretation into what He says to render him a Pelagian heretic, since simply adhering to the natural law is NOT SALVIFIC.  There MUST BE SUPERNATURAL FAITH, and living by the natural law cannot and does not blot out Original Sin, since that can be done by Christ's Redemption.

You don't even believe in a Baptism of Desire.  There's no reference to any kind of Baptism whatsoever in your heretical soteriology.  So here you commit yet another heresy, by holding that salvation can be had without the Sacraments.

You inject your heretical intepretation by your own admission (in Hellish red font) above, adulterating the meaning of Pope Pius IX and turning him into a Pelagian heretic.  If you claim that somoene can earn his way to salvation merely by following the natural law, without any supernatural faith, thereby expunging and overcoming Original sin by your own following of natural law, thereby rendering Our Lord's Redemption entirely superfluous -- there are at least half a dozen heretical propositions floating around in this diseased mind and soul of yours.

You deny Original Sin ... Pelagian heresy ... and claim that you can be saved so long as you do not commit ACTUAL sins, by your own power, without any supernatural faith, merely by following the natural law.

You clearly don't even know what Pelagian heresy is.

At this point, you are diabolically possessed as you continue to promote your vile heresy.