The problem is you apparently think Paradise = Heaven. This is your error. Paradise is absolutely not Heaven.

In reality, Paradise = Limbo of the Fathers = Abraham's Bosom

Now, finally, I think I might have a clue why don't understand me. You don't understand what "paradise" is.

You quoted my words below (which I stand by 100% BTW):
"not all who are outside the Church will burn in hell forever and never make it to paradise"

Then you went on a rant, mocking me:

"Erm, but I actually proposed limbo for them, but I also said they can be saved, but not like 'salvation' saved, but actually yes salvation but not like the Saints salvation, because only those who go straight to heaven can be said to have 'salvation', but those who die outside the Church can make it to paradise, but not like actual paradise, but they can also get to heaven, but remember I actually said limbo so you're wrong to call me a heretic".

To be clear, I never said they went to Heaven. At least I don't remember saying that. If I said it, it was a mistake. But I certainly said that they go to paradise. And paradise is just another name for the Limbus Patrum or Abraham's Bosom.

The problem is you apparently think Paradise = Heaven. This is your error. Paradise is absolutely not Heaven.

In reality, Paradise = Limbo of the Fathers = Abraham's Bosom

However, not all who are outside the Church will burn in Hell forever and never make it to Paradise. In fact, even most Catholics will suffer "the fires of Hell" in Purgatory for a long time before entering Paradise

Yes, those outside the Church who remain in their state of sin by rejecting Christ and His Church at the time of their death "cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Ever." Agreed

But people in those categories can make an act of Perfect Contrition to God directly before their death can be justified by that act. They will not go to Heaven directly. They will need to expiate their sins. Where do they do that?

Don't worry, the barbarian hordes are not going to overrun the Pearly Gates. Most people do not keep the natural law. Most people (Catholics included) only keep the divine law because they are afraid of going to Hell

Yes, a person who is aware of the Catholic faith (i.e., one that is not invincibly ignorant) must believe the Catholic faith to be saved

I think it would be the most fitting abode for the "invincibly ignorant" until Christ's Second Coming, as Abraham's Bosom performed a very similar function prior to Christ's Resurrection.

Because as Pius IX says those with "invincible ignorance about our most holy religion...are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace."

So these gentiles (those outside) were converted to the faith (justified) not by hearing about religious laws, whether true ones or false ones. Rather, by were converted to the true faith (justified) by the grace of Christ helping them to obey the natural law written on their hearts.
They voluntarily cooperated with the divine grace. It doesn't matter what religion they may have been surrounded by. God chose those people and gave them special graces to come to the true faith. Note he did not say they came to the Church. Remember, these people are described as gentiles (those outside).

This disposition, or preparation, is followed by Justification itself, which is not remission of sins merely, but also the sanctification and renewal of the inward man, through the voluntary reception of the grace, and of the gifts, whereby man of unjust becomes just, and of an enemy a friend, that so he may be an heir according to hope of life everlasting

2 Corinthians 4:3 And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost

Wrong.  Abraham's Bosom was a TEMPORARY PLACE.

In the context of the 4 last things - death, judgement, heaven, hell....paradise = heaven.

Even if you argue that Abraham's bosom = paradise, then ALL THOSE who went there, ended up in heaven.  So Abraham's Bosom = heaven (eventually).

As i've told you before, when the concept of "Limbo" was discussed (related to infants dying before baptism), they were NOT talking about Abraham's bosom, which was STRICTLY for the OT Fathers.  The new testament as "Limbo" as a permanent state, which is the upper parts of hell. 

Abraham's bosom is temporary for OT.  "Limbo" is permanent for new testament.

I'm not entertaining your BS anymore

1) St Thomas isn't infallible.  2) who goes to Abraham's bosom and who goes to "normal" limbo?  3)  Or is St Thomas saying that Abraham's bosom remains a place, but uninhabited, like the Garden of Eden?

1) St Thomas isn't infallible.  2) who goes to Abraham's bosom and who goes to "normal" limbo?  3)  Or is St Thomas saying that Abraham's bosom remains a place, but uninhabited, like the Garden of Eden?

2) Abraham's Bosom is simply another name for the Limbus Patrum, the Limbo of the Fathers. It is also a synonym of the earthly Paradise that Jesus spoke of to Dismas. And it is also the place where Enoch and Elijah are believed to be (Aquinas). I can't answer your question because I don't know what you mean by "normal limbo." Read Aquinas. I gave you the link. Maybe you will learn something from him.

3) St. Thomas did not have any strong personal conviction about whether Abraham's Bosom remained after Christ. But he said "nothing prevents" it from remaining, or at least the place the serves the same purpose.

The bottom line is that our conversations on these mysteries is somewhat speculative. The Church has not ruled one way or another. Different people are allowed to have different opinions. It is clearly not heretical simply to posit the possibility of these abodes continuing to exist and being populated. Aquinas himself does that very thing.

No, there is no contradiction. Because as Pius IX says those with "invincible ignorance about our most holy religion...are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace." And God's "supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments."

It is not heretical for me to say it, just as it was not heretical for Pius IX to say it.