Can anybody talk to the bold point particularity?

Here is a quote from the 1941 version of the Baltimore Catechism.

321. How can those be saved who through no fault of their own have not received the sacrament of Baptism?

Those who through no fault of their own have not received the sacrament of Baptism can be saved through what is called baptism of blood or baptism of desire.

https://www.catholicity.com/baltimore-catechism/lesson24.html


This was being taught, and you are saying that the Baltimore Catechism was teaching error to all people in 1941?

This causes a great scandal.

Most catechisms, when taken in their entirety, are most certainly not infallible.  Men often interject their opinions into their catechisms, and their opinions are oftentimes most certainly fallacious. It is so ridiculous when Catholics mumble so much gibberish and then say, "Well, the catechism says."  Very often it is the case that the more recent (redacted) catechisms will state what the original catechism did not state.  The modernists do these tricks all the time.  

Most catechisms, when taken in their entirety, are most certainly not infallible.  Men often interject their opinions into their catechisms, and their opinions are oftentimes most certainly fallacious. It is so ridiculous when Catholics mumble so much gibberish and then say, "Well, the catechism says."  Very often it is the case that the more recent (redacted) catechisms will state what the original catechism did not state.  The modernists do these tricks all the time. 

It is true that catechisms are not infallible.  It is also true that catechisms approved by the Church contain the Imprimatur and Nihil obstat, the latter meaning that the Church declares the work to be free of doctrinal and moral error.  When opinions about doctrine or private interpretations of what an official Church docuмent "really means" are expressed here they are likewise NOT infallible, they lack the Imprimatur and Nihil obstat, and most likely are given by persons who do not have a Licentiate in Sacred Theology (STL) issued by the Church.  I have no problem in determining what I should give the greater weight to.

Below are catechisms I have in my library:
The Faith of Our Fathers, Being a Plain Exposition and Vindication of the Church Founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ
James Cardinal Gibbons, 1876
P.J, Kennedy and Sons New York, Printers to the Holy See
Has been translated into French, German, Spanish, Italian, Norwegian, and Swedish
 
A Catechism of the Catholic Religion
Rev. Joseph Deharbe, S.J. 1878
Schwartz, Kirwin & Fauss New York
Translated from German
 
The Question Box, Replies to Questions Received on Missions to Non-Catholics
Rev. Bertrand L. Conway, C.S.P, 1929
The Paulist Press, New York
 
The Spirit of Catholicism
Fr. Karl Adam, translated from German 1929
Sheed and Ward London
 
The Faith of Millions, The Credentials of the Catholic Religion
Rev. John A. O’Brien, Ph.D., LL.D., 1938
Our Sunday Visitor Huntington, Indiana
 
Father Smith Instructs Jackson
Archbishop John Francis Knoll, D.D., L.L.D., and Fr. Lester J. Fallon, C.M., S.T.D.
1945

Baltimore Catechism No. 3, 1949
Confraternity of Christian Doctrine
Benziger Brothers

These are mostly first editions or reprints of the original editions except the Baltimore.  The original Baltimore Catechism #2, issued in 1885 by the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore, is available online and I've compared the two.  They both are in agreement about the point I'm going to make.

ALL of these approved catechisms teach BOD / BOB.