CathInfo.com

So ... as usual, it's never about logic for the promoters of BoD.  They've made up their mind beforehand what they want to believe for various ulterior motives.

... as if the Baltimore Catechism were infallible and is the equivalent of the "Church teaching".

Msgr. Fenton takes apart the Baltimore Catechism on the subject of salvation.

We have here someone who's bought into the sedevacantist narrative where they make this statement that "[t]he Church cannot teach error" into some absolute, which renders nonsensical any definition of papal infallibility, making it so that an allocution given by a Pope might as well have been a solemn dogmatic definition, such as that of the Immaculate Conception.

This individual goes so far as to claim this of the Baltimore Catechism, rendering the mindset more and more ridiculouser as she progresses, and I've even encountered a sedevacantists who claimed that any book with an imprimatur on it must be regarded as error free, and protected from error.

Now, this attitude leads to bizarre psychological problems and neuroses.

Ladislaus, I am honestly asking questions which are not being answered.

Let's start with this simple question how long has this error of BoD and BoB (from your perspective, I have not decided on the issue yet) been popping up in Catechisms.  This is what has been taught to converts and children for 100+ years.  If this is the case, then no wonder V2 was able to do what it did.

I still think that we really don't have to get down to the nitty-gritty on this topic because  if you approach everyone as if they need to be baptized by water to be saved, then there is nothing more to be discussed.