Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Possible strict-EENS chapel  (Read 124531 times)

0 Members and 142 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2785
  • Reputation: +1398/-315
  • Gender: Male
Re: Possible strict-EENS chapel
« Reply #345 on: Today at 06:40:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But that person had the sin of presumption.  It does not mean that BoD is not a thing because people use it improperly..

    I still don't get why we argue about this sooo much.  We need to just convert everybody as best we can using EENS  Period.  End of story.
    Because most trads do not believe EENS. And they viciously attack those who do by calling us heretics.

    They are also using a false version of BoD to gut EENS. This have been explained many times and you still don't seem to get it. (Also no version of BoD is 'correct' but the Saints speculated for catechumans only).

    Offline OABrownson1876

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 757
    • Reputation: +634/-30
    • Gender: Male
      • The Orestes Brownson Society
    Re: Possible strict-EENS chapel
    « Reply #346 on: Today at 07:21:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Says the man who puts Leonard Feeney's interpretation of those teachings ABOVE the interpretation of Pius IX.
    The reign of Pope Pius IX was thirty-two years.  I find it admirable how so many Catholic individuals are just yearning to find a way to put noxious heretics into heaven because they are so sincere in their heresies.  The poor native who was on a desert island, sucking on Coca Cola, looking at his cellphone, but could not find out about the Church.  Poor guy!  It is laughable to think that everything Pope Pius IX has written is infallible.  When the pope writes an Encyclical - even if he is a pre-Vatican II pope - is just as fallible as any other theologian. The only exception is an Encyclical which invokes the charism of infallibility, and even then usually only one or two sentences are the subject of infallibility. 
    Bryan Shepherd, M.A. Phil.
    PO Box 17248
    2312 S. Preston
    Louisville, Ky. 40217; email:letsgobryan@protonmail.com. substack: bryanshepherd.substack.com
    website: www.orestesbrownson.org. Rumble: rumble.com/user/Orestes76


    Offline Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 3511
    • Reputation: +1932/-992
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Possible strict-EENS chapel
    « Reply #347 on: Today at 07:43:31 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Because most trads do not believe EENS. And they viciously attack those who do by calling us heretics.

    They are also using a false version of BoD to gut EENS. This have been explained many times and you still don't seem to get it. (Also no version of BoD is 'correct' but the Saints speculated for catechumans only).
    If I don't get it and others don't get it and there is no official docuмent from the church condemning BoD or defining BoD, then it is still up for discussion.  Correct?

    If you are talking about people who are Novus Ordo Catholics and people who follow the SSPX then of course they do not believe in EENS, because they have been taught incorrectly. I am just tired of non theologians, people who have no authority in the Church what so ever deciding that this topic has been dogmatically decided and people can call others heretics because of it.  Do not be naive BoDers and Non-BoDers both call each other heretics in a heated debate.  In this day and age nobody seems to know their proper place with God.  Just saying.
    Fatti Maschii, Parole Femine