Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire  (Read 6500 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DecemRationis

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Reputation: +875/-146
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
« Reply #15 on: March 10, 2021, 02:16:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Then why did you say the following yesterday?

    Following Pope St. Siricius, BoD is heresy. Consequently those who believe, teach, or preach BoD are heretics, and the Dimonds are right (in accusing ... ).

    Welcome back. 
    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46562
    • Reputation: +27424/-5067
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #16 on: March 10, 2021, 02:37:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Then why did you say the following yesterday?

    Following Pope St. Siricius, BoD is heresy. Consequently those who believe, teach, or preach BoD are heretics, and the Dimonds are right (in accusing ... ).

    I don't believe that he was DEFINING directly that part of his sentence ... the same thing I said about Trent and BoD.

    So, he's saying ---
    "Baptize adults in danger of death ASAP ... since we'd risk our souls in that each one of them would be lost."

    That part of the sentence is an explanation or reason, and the reasons don't have the same authority as the actual definition.

    So, for instance, in the dogmatic definition of the Immaculate Conception, there's a difference in authority between the actual defined proposition, namely, that Our Lady was conceived in Original Sin, and the explanatory reasons for why it's true.

    Same thing applies here, so that core of the statement is a command "baptize adults in danger of death ASAP" ... because ....


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46562
    • Reputation: +27424/-5067
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #17 on: March 10, 2021, 02:40:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • That's strong and authoritative: "He does not need you as His advocate." I like that.

    Do you have a source for that quote?

    Here's the footnote citation:
    St. Jerome, Letter to Ctesiphontes, Migne, Patrologiae Latinae, 21, 1147-1161, translated from the Latin by Giovanni Ricciardi, 30 Days, February, 1991, English edition, San Francisco, pp. 50-51.

    But I found the quote here:
    https://catholicism.org/pelagius-lives.html

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46562
    • Reputation: +27424/-5067
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #18 on: March 10, 2021, 02:46:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here's the footnote citation:
    St. Jerome, Letter to Ctesiphontes, Migne, Patrologiae Latinae, 21, 1147-1161, translated from the Latin by Giovanni Ricciardi, 30 Days, February, 1991, English edition, San Francisco, pp. 50-51.

    But I found the quote here:
    https://catholicism.org/pelagius-lives.html

    Hey, if I win the Lottery, I could buy this entire set of Migne's work:

    https://www.abebooks.com/Patrologiae-cursus-completus-Series-Latina-Latinae/22010874493/bd
    for only about $20,000

    It was so nice when I had access to the University library, which had all these.  There's a total of 50,000 pages from the Latin Fathers ... and all the way through the 13th century, and these are large pages with small print.

    Offline Comrade

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 195
    • Reputation: +87/-19
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #19 on: March 10, 2021, 05:28:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is not new but good to bring up again. MHFM published Pope St. Siricius Decree  with a video and a very detailed breakdown/analysis over 7 years ago.

    https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/latin-text-oldest-surviving-papal-decree-rejects-baptism-desire/#.YElUQ2hKhaQ



    Offline ElwinRansom1970

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1007
    • Reputation: +765/-146
    • Gender: Male
    • γνῶθι σεαυτόν - temet nosce
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #20 on: March 10, 2021, 06:14:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I vividly recall over 25 years ago debating Water Baptism vs. BOD with two priests in an SSPX chapel residency. The priests (one now in the FSSP and the other still SSPX yet very infamous now) vehemently defended BOD in ways that were unmistakably Pelagian.

    It is quite shameful that Catholics know so little about the Celtic monk Morgan (Pelagius) and his doctrines. As a result, Pelagianism is amongst the most frequently encountered errors in the Church today, circulating even commonly in otherwise traditionalist quarters.
    "I distrust every idea that does not seem obsolete and grotesque to my contemporaries."
    Nicolás Gómez Dávila

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46562
    • Reputation: +27424/-5067
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #21 on: March 10, 2021, 07:40:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is not new but good to bring up again. MHFM published Pope St. Siricius Decree  with a video and a very detailed breakdown/analysis over 7 years ago.

    https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/latin-text-oldest-surviving-papal-decree-rejects-baptism-desire/#.YElUQ2hKhaQ

    Oh, I know it's not new.  But I threw it out there to see if any proponents of BoD would dare to address this.

    None did.

    It was a bit of a trap.  I was waiting for them to disparage the authority of this docuмent, and then turn it around on them and ask why the same couldn't be said of the infamous Pope Innocent II docuмent cited by St. Alphonsus.  Well, actually, I knew they would not touch this with a 10-foot pole ... understanding as I do their mentality and their modus operandi.

    Nothing but crickets here.

    They won't actually answer any arguments from their opponents.  They simply re-spam the same pro-BoD sources over and over again to pretend that only those sources exist.

    This continues to demonstrate that they deliberately ignore any evidence contrary to their belief in BoD.  I wish to show that their entire case is fabricated by filtering out information that is inconsistent with BoD.

    Offline gemmarose

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 205
    • Reputation: +54/-224
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #22 on: March 10, 2021, 10:22:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  •  Ladislaus comment:

    And the typical confirmation bias of those who promote BoD causes them to ignore this.

    See, unlike the BoD zealouts, the "Feeneyites" acknowledge the existence of contrary indicators or contrary evidence.  We admit that St. Thomas, St. Robert Bellarmine, et al. believed in BoD.  There's no need to keep re-spamming these quotes over and over again.  But, being objective, we ALSO see evidence AGAINST Baptism of Desire, including the 5 or 6 Church Fathers who categorically rejected it (Fathers whom the BoD zealots filter out of the equation).

    So to look at the picture, some were in favor and some were against.  This leaves the overall status of BoD as a controverted matter.  I hold that this decree from Pope St. Siricius demolishes Baptism of Desire, as does the dogmatic definition that there's no salvation outside the "Church of the faithful."


    Good points. I understand Pope St. Leo the Great's dogmatic letter to the Council of Chalcedon is also a good reference for the mind of the early Popes.



    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #23 on: March 11, 2021, 08:21:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  the proponents of BoD ignore this decree from Pope St. Siricius.  Unlike those two letters from the Innocents, this was was presented as authoritative papal teaching, addressed to the entire Church, ..... In other words, of those desiring to receive it, every single one of them would lose their soul without the Sacrament of Baptism ("water pouring" of Baptism).
    Thanks for the reminder. I hope you do not mind if I plagiarize your comments, because I just did. 

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46562
    • Reputation: +27424/-5067
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #24 on: March 11, 2021, 08:44:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for the reminder. I hope you do not mind if I plagiarize your comments, because I just did.

    Of course not.  Whatever it takes to defend EENS dogma, my friend.

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #25 on: March 11, 2021, 02:04:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • We've heard a lot about Popes Innocent II and/or Innocent the II endorsing the notion of BoD, but the proponents of BoD ignore this decree from Pope St. Siricius.  Unlike those two letters from the Innocents, this was was presented as authoritative papal teaching, addressed to the entire Church, finishing with the statement that what he decreed should be observed by all those who  qui nolunt ab apostolicae petrae, super quam Christus universalem construxit Ecclesiam, soliditate divelli "who do not wish to be severed from the solidity of the Apostolic Rock upon which Christ founded the universal Church."  This docuмent seems to meet all the notes of papal infallibility (unlike the other two, which were not addressed to the Universal Church and in which the Popes were clearly opining rather than authoritatively teaching).

    Here's the key section.

    MY TRANSLATION:
    "Not to derogate in any way from the respect owed to Easter [my comment:  when Baptisms were normally done], so it is our will, in the case of infants who can not yet speak on account of their age, or in the case of those would have any kind of urgent need for the waters of Baptism, that they be given aid with all haste, lest it endanger our souls, were each an every one leaving this world to forfeit "both the kingdom and life" (very literal translation here) by denying the Saving Font to those desiring it."

    Notice that he actually uses the term "desire" (vs. votum) here.  His choice of terms is undoubtedly providential, since this teaching effectively shoots down Baptism of "Desire".

    He's saying here that "each and every one" or "every single one" of those denied the Sacrament ("wave of Baptism", "water movement of Baptism", another water word like "laver" in Trent) would lose eternal life in the Kingdom while DESIRING to receive it.

    In other words, of those desiring to receive it, every single one of them would lose their soul without the Sacrament of Baptism ("water pouring" of Baptism).

    Crickets from XavierSem and those of the different flavors of salvation of the "nice" non-Catholics:






    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46562
    • Reputation: +27424/-5067
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #26 on: March 11, 2021, 02:47:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thus far, RomanTheo (Father Kramer) was the only one to attempt a response, which was that the context of this is simply to command that infants and adults in danger of death be baptized right away, instead of waiting for Easter time.

    I responded, sure, but he clearly states that each and every one of those who pass away without Baptism will perish ... even while desiring the Sacrament.  So he didn't really address that part of the quote at all.  This is a SUPPORTING REASON for his decree, so I agree that he's not directly defining it, but this still has a lot of weight, and it clearly indicates that the Pope did NOT believe in Baptism of Desire.  Father Kramer said that they should be baptized because there's "no guarantee of salvation" by Baptism of Desire.  But that's not WHAT THE POPE SAYS.  He doesn't say there's "no guarantee" but, rather, that it doesn't happen at all.

    See I think that Father Kramer was reading into this docuмent what his own believe is, that, yes we should baptized because there's no guarantee of their salvation by BoD.  But that is simply not what the pope is saying.

    Argue if you want that this isn't infallible, but then I would say the same a fortiori about the letters of Popes Innocent II and Innocent III.  Unlike this decree, which was addressed to the Universal Church and having supreme authority, those were merely letters written to individual bishops in which the Popes were merely opining in favor of BoD.  In other words, they had much less authority than this docuмent.

    So they simply IGNORE this docuмent because nothing there's nothing they can say about it that would not backfire on them and their entire case in favor of BoD.  In fact, any criticism they could make of this docuмent would totally gut their position that rejecting BoD is heretical or even an error.  And they know it.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11415
    • Reputation: +6381/-1119
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #27 on: March 11, 2021, 03:02:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I responded, sure, but he clearly states that each and every one of those who pass away without Baptism will perish ... even while desiring the Sacrament.  
    I thought that most here at least believed that the Church taught BOD for catechumens.  How would that be okay based on what this pope said?

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12102
    • Reputation: +7626/-2304
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #28 on: March 12, 2021, 08:37:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • XavierSem's response:
    .
    .
    I will answer that, and it is easy to do so, but answer my question first, Last Tradhican. I addressed it to Ladislaus above and I'm asking you now.

    Q. 1. "Let me ask those who may agree with the Dimonds on some matters one simple question: Let's say His Holiness Pope St. Pius was alive today. Let's also say you submitted a theological study, with some "Dubia" to him. H.H. reads it, then says, "No, my son, the Church truly teaches BOD. I did myself in my Catechism. And now, I as Vicar of Christ assure you of it"? Would you submit to his teaching? Or attack and condemn H.H. for it?"

    As to Pope St. Siricius' decree, "Sicut sacram ergo paschalem reverentiam in nullo dicimus esse minuendam, ita infantibus qui necdum loqui poterunt per aetatem vel his, quibus in qualibet necessitate opus fuerit sacra unda baptismatis, omni volumus celeritate succurri, ne ad nostrarum perniciem tendat animarum, si negato desiderantibus fonte salutari exiens unusquisque de saeculo et regnum perdat et vitam." notice the Pontiff does not use the term "voto", which signifies a supernatural desire with contrition, but rather desiderantibus, which speaks of a mere natural desire. A mere natural desire, as everyone should know by now, as St. Thomas explains and even for that matter the Holy Office Letter mentions (when it says supernatural faith and supernatural charity are necessary for desire to be supernaturally efficacious) does not suffice to receive the Baptism of Desire. That should clear it up.

    This is also a disciplinary decree, not a dogmatic definition. It also mentions infants. Even the New Catechism says every effort must be made to bring little children to Baptism, since only Baptism itself provides assurance that original sin is remitted and they go to heaven. Every effort must always be made to bring Baptism to adults, since adults also may not be able to attain contrition and thus have a purely natural desire for the Sacrament, which doesn't suffice.

    This would satisfy most people, but I won't be surprised, Last Tradhican, if it doesn't satisfy you, and I subsequently hear "crickets" from you on this thread

    Now, here's the Second Question, pertaining to BOD being de fide, because of the Pope and Bishops teaching it as divinely revealed in Church Catechisms.

    Q.2. Church Catechisms approved by the Pope have not only taught BOD but presented it as divinely revealed. Now when something is taught by the Pope and the Bishops as divinely revealed, theologians say that is sufficient for the doctrine to be accepted as de fide. Do you want to see the quote of Fr. Tanqueray again saying this? I cited it in another thread and I believe even in this thread earlier. What some of you Dimond-disciples fail to understand is that the Church is guided by the Holy Spirit not only in the first millenium but in the second also The divine assistance of the Holy Spirit promised to the Successors of St. Peter was not promised only in the 4th century, when Pope St. Siricius lived,  or for some arbitrary time limit like 1000 years only, to cease to exist in the second millenium, when the Popes taught BOD, and in the 19th or 20th century, when Pope Leo XIII or Pope St. Pius X, lived. The Church has deemed the doctrine of Baptism of Desire safe to teach Her Faithful.

    Your argument is ultimately not with us, but with the Catholic Church and Her Supreme Pontiffs itself. You believe the Church erred and contradicted dogma.

    If She actually did do that, that would make Her a false religion, just like the others. False religions are false because they contradict dogma, as they all do.

    So why the exception for the Catholic Church? If supposedly She taught heresies as dogma, then She's false also. But rather Dimondism alone is false.

    And it has never actually happened that the Church has contradicted Her own dogma. Struthio essentially claimed all Popes who taught BOD are heretics. 

    See the absurdity and stupidity of the anti-BOD position. It leads to the belief that Popes, Saints and Doctors are Heretics and denies Church Indefectibility.

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope St. Siricius rejects Baptism of Desire
    « Reply #29 on: March 12, 2021, 08:55:21 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • What an idiot.