SJB likes to pretend that neither he nor anyone else can read and that we need approved (modernist) theologians to read for us.
Not when it comes to Vatican II though. Then he says all the approved theologians were wrong.
So for you, Alcuin! Vatican II isn't a break with tradition? It isn't a unique event?
How so? Look in the traditional Denzinger's sometime and see who the editor was. (Answer: Father Karl Rahner). Rahner was in good standing with Pope Pius XII, wasn't he? Maybe a few censures, but those got cleaned-up. Point is that when Pope Pius XII died, Rahner was an approved theologian within the Catholic Church. Why not accept him as such?