St. Thomas, Summa Theologica:
“After grace had been revealed, both the learned and simple folk are bound to explicit faith in the mysteries of Christ, chiefly as regards those which are observed throughout the Church, and publicly proclaimed, such as the articles which refer to the Incarnation, of which we have spoken above.”
Saint Thomas, Summa Theologica:
“And consequently, when once grace had been revealed, all were bound to explicit faith in the mystery of the Trinity.”
Is he saying, by say 70 A.D., everyone that comes into existence from that time on must explicitly believe in the Incarnation and the Holy Trinity even if it has not been revealed to them through no fault of their own? Does he contradict himself when he appears to teach contrary to how some understand the above? I do not believe Saint Thomas contradicts himself on the issue. And the weighted teaching throughout the centuries have made the teaching clear as summarized in the authoritative docuмent Suprema haec, which repeats the infallible and de fide doctrine on BOD.
All we know is that it is possible for non-members to be saved so long as they die within the Church at least by desire, even if that desire is only implicit. We should not speculate further. No one can know of the Church's necessity for salvation, refuse to join as a member and be saved. The same is true in regards to the necessity of baptism.
No one culpably ignorant of the necessity of the Church and baptism for salvation can be saved.
No invincibly ignorant person in regards to the necessity of the Church and Baptism can be saved by merely wishing to join the Church or be baptized, but must have an active desire that is willing to do what God wills them to do.
The feeneyites represent the teaching of the Church on this issue pretending we teach contrary to the above.
We do no disservice to souls by defending the infallible truth of BOD against the heretical notion that denies it. Souls made aware of the Catholic Faith cannot be considered inculpably ignorant, if they refuse to look seriously and dispassionately into her claims.
We show souls that the Church merely teaches what her Founder teaches, and shows Him not to be the arbitrary Tyrant the Feeneyites would have Him be. The teaching on BOD puts the Church and her Founder in a favorable light merely showing that God does not condemn anyone not culpable of any objective active sin committed.
Some boldly, inexplicably and seemingly dishonestly claim that we teach that baptism is optional, as if when trying to convert someone we tell them if and when you realize the Catholic Church is the One True Church you can either get baptized or merely desire to be baptized. People who make this assertion should be banned and never heard from again as they take away from the possibility of discussing the topic in a sane manner.
Those old enough to make a decision for or against God do so and their hearts are known only by God. Every person in existence is either in the Kingdom of God or the Kingdom of Satan. Some go back and forth throughout life. But there is no third option or middle ground. Here is an area where there is no grey as God sees it. It is grey in our minds because we cannot read the hearts of men as God does. He knows if they love him with the love of benevolence and have a supernatural faith based upon Divine Revelation. The Church merely teaches that at a minimum this is what is required in order for them to be saved. Many pretend the Catholic Church is not the true Church because they do not want to change their lifestyles. But God knows their hearts. Some, not to few throughout history have been inculpably ignorant on the necessity of the Church for salvation, and are not damned for that reason. They may be damned for other reasons however.
They either love God with the love of charity, and are therefore striving towards membership within the Church, even if they do not join before they die, or they have an aversion to God and therefore despite all their protestations to the contrary, are culpably ignorant for the sake of convenience and will be damned.
This not something made up by me. This has been hashed out and clarified over the centuries, especially when the theologians were finally done clarifying membership in the the Church and her visibility in response to the Protestant revolt and then could focus on the neglected issue of how one can be within the Church despite not being a member. God does not condemn a soul for an actual sin they are not culpable of. We have the Church's infallible backing on the issue. If she taught the contrary [water or damnation] even if only authoritatively and not infallibly, I would readily accept it.
The theologians, Fathers, Doctors, Saints who researched the issue simply conclude, with infallible backing, that one must have a supernatural faith and perfect charity in order to be saved, and this is indeed possible apart from water baptism, as has been infallibly taught by Saint Ambrose and countless others since. It would be ridiculous for the Church to infallibly teach baptism of desire while at the same time denying it is impossible to obtain sanctifying grace apart from water. But such theories have to be brought up by the desperate Feeneyites.