Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Nascent Feeney, Reply to a Liberal  (Read 1368 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nascent Feeney, Reply to a Liberal
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2014, 08:32:07 AM »
and yet more sedespam

Nascent Feeney, Reply to a Liberal
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2014, 05:21:58 AM »
Quote
Many of these quotes (or quotes similar to them from the same sources) we have seen before, and others are obvious as to be in no need of further comment, but let us briefly review them:

    We have already seen how the Church has always tempered John 3:5 with Matthew 16:25 (for BOB) and Matthew 10:32 (for BOD) - Installment 5. And we also have seen St. John Chrysostom's (and St. Gregory nαzιanzen') discussion of how those who consciously abuse the teaching by BOD to refraining from being baptized until practically the end of life in no way attacked the doctrine itself but only the abuse - Installment 10b. And we have seen how St. Ambrose's famous "who shall ascend" quote is shortly followed with mention of some sort of mercy for those not guilty. - Installment 10a.


Nascent Feeney, Reply to a Liberal
« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2014, 08:08:57 AM »
 :ready-to-eat:

Nascent Feeney, Reply to a Liberal
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2014, 08:20:09 AM »
Quote from: J.Paul
:ready-to-eat:


I'm not sure how that settles the issue on Feeney.

Nascent Feeney, Reply to a Liberal
« Reply #9 on: August 27, 2014, 08:21:10 AM »
Quote from: J.Paul
:ready-to-eat:


I meant not to post a second time.  An apparent computer glitch.