A quotation with 4 errors as I pointed out in detail, is good for nothing. It's nodifferent than St. Cyprian teaching that the heretics baptism is invalid, or St. Augustines teaching that unbaptized children suffer the sense pains of hell, and all the other errors taught by the Saints. Of course it's harmful, just look at how many people quote it as evidense for implicit BOD, and implicit faith.
Actually, since a good thing can be later abused, that misuse and its bad effect doesn't necessarily signify whether that thing itself is good or bad. My question was not about later, or whether it was abused, but whether the writing, when it was written, called into doubt previous solemnly defined EENS dogma?
There you go again, just like I said you do:
nadie wrote to Cupertino: Reading whatever you write in excruciating, I just don't bother with it. First I have to understand what you are asking, which is hard enough, then when in the past I responded, you keep telling me that I don't respond. I don't think that you know what you want. Have someone else ask it in their manner of thinking, in their words, maybe that's a solution. Other than that, just come to the reality that I don't read what you write anymore. Nevertheless, I'm here giving you a way to get a response, get yourself an "interpreter", that can elucidate to me what you are asking and where you are going.
Actually, since a good thing can be later abused, that misuse and its bad effect doesn't necessarily signify whether that thing itself is good or bad.
That's irrelevant in this case, since this is not a "good thing", that we are talking about here. This quotation is not good, in fact it's good for nothing. Error is not good. Read what I wrote:
A quotation with 4 errors as I pointed out in detail, is good for nothing. It's no different than St. Cyprian teaching that the heretics baptism is invalid, or St. Augustines teaching that unbaptized children suffer the sense pains of hell, and all the other errors taught by the Saints. Of course it's harmful, just look at how many people quote it as evidense for implicit BOD, and implicit faith.
Add that to all the contradiction you have to deal with.
Topic: NADIEIMPORTANTE - Roman Catechism, Baptism Accident (Read 11431 times)