Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: NADIEIMPORTANTE - Roman Catechism, Baptism Accident  (Read 11434 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NADIEIMPORTANTE - Roman Catechism, Baptism Accident
« Reply #30 on: January 15, 2012, 06:50:32 PM »
Wow, Cupertino, that is not a response. That is an evasion.

Do you confess the Dogmas of the Church are to be understood exactly as they are phrased?

Because that's how you view the Catechism.

You are not competent to ascertain my spiritual age, because you reject the universal and ordinary magisterium as revealed by the unanimous consent of the Fathers of the church.

NADIEIMPORTANTE - Roman Catechism, Baptism Accident
« Reply #31 on: January 15, 2012, 07:00:28 PM »
"A fine definition of Unanimous Consent, based on the Church Counccils, is provided in the Maryknoll Catholic Dictionary, “When the Fathers of the Church are morally unanimous in their teaching that a certain doctrine is a part of revelation, or is received by the universal Church, or that the opposite of a doctrine is heretical, then their united testimony is a certain criterion of divine tradition. As the Fathers are not personally infallible, the counter-testimony of one or two would not be destructive of the value of the collective testimony; so a moral unanimity only is required” (Wilkes-Barre, Penn.: Dimension Books, 1965), pg. 153.


NADIEIMPORTANTE - Roman Catechism, Baptism Accident
« Reply #32 on: January 15, 2012, 11:38:00 PM »
Quote from: Augstine Baker
Quote from: Cupertino
Quote from: Augstine Baker
The Dogma was never attacked significantly and systematically till the Protestant Revolt and even then it was nothing compared to the attacks levelled against the Dogma in the eighteenth century.


Wait until you die, Austin. Then you will realize how much of a fool you have been to been taken in by this Jansenistic twist to God's mercy as believed by the whole Church way before you were born. You are smarter, though, aren't you? Saints and popes, and a generation of clergy were all so dumb compared you!





No, I just know that you're one man with his own story to tell, and you are overstepping your mandate.  I think it's called presumption.

Physician, heal thyself.

I'm not the one who thinks the Church has defected, that's you.


 :rolleyes:

See the low calibre of what you are dealing with Cupertino?

To bring some truth to bear on AugBakers despicable accusation; it is clear to any honest reader of your posts Cupertino, that you are a traditional Catholic and that you do not think the Church has defected.

NADIEIMPORTANTE - Roman Catechism, Baptism Accident
« Reply #33 on: January 15, 2012, 11:58:03 PM »
You're all lucky I have to go to work next week! lol. THis is just me in one weekend! imagine if I had a whole week to do nothing but post!

 :smoke-pot:

Remember fellow traddies...keep your sense of humor, or you are gonna lose it. Your mind that is.

NADIEIMPORTANTE - Roman Catechism, Baptism Accident
« Reply #34 on: January 16, 2012, 01:48:24 AM »
Quote from: Gregory I
You're all lucky I have to go to work next week! lol. THis is just me in one weekend! imagine if I had a whole week to do nothing but post



Scary thought!

Hey would you please take the rest of F-Troop with you when you go?  :laugh1:

Quote from: Gregory I


Remember fellow traddies...keep your sense of humor, or you are gonna lose it. Your mind that is.



You talk about future possibilities, but The F-Troop is already proffering theological insanity - now.  And some of them have no humor either - let alone about themselves. They take themselves oh so seriously.

Honestly some of the F-Troop stuff I have seen here is truly laughable, so, thanks for that.  :laugh1: