Author Topic: Matthew: Please define Feeneyism and explain why its allowed (Read 3297 times)

roscoe · « **Reply #20 on:** August 19, 2014, 09:04:33 PM »

Quote from: J.Paul

Canterella,
Quote
Genuine Fenneyites HAVE NOTHING TO DO with Dimond Brothers or any lunatic sedevacantists for that matter.

Truer words..............

'Nothing" is wrong as they do have a few things in common.

roscoe · « **Reply #21 on:** August 19, 2014, 09:40:35 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

Because 'Feeneyites' can never be 'sedes' does mean that the anti-pope Frank is Il Papa. Until a future Council determines otherwise, Sirites are bound to recognise Gregory XVII & his successors even if we are not sure who he is. :cheers:

Sorry about the typo-- the first line should read ........does Not mean....

Lover of Truth · « **Reply #22 on:** August 20, 2014, 05:21:53 AM »

Quote from: Cantarella

Clarification for those out there confused:

Genuine Fenneyites HAVE NOTHING TO DO with Dimond Brothers or any lunatic sedevacantists for that matter. They have "stolen" the focus of our crusade: the dogma of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus as it was taught and solemnly proclaimed before the heresy of Modernism and courageously defended by Fr. Leonard Feeney and they have twisted it to fit an unholy purpose.

This is taken so seriously, that sedevacantists cannot be part of the SBC Third Order. They are not welcome.

Authentic "feeneyites" cannot ever be sedevacantists. The comparison or relation to the Dimond Brothers is an insult for which only ignorance is a justifiable excuse.

You have plenty in common with the Dimonds. Calling people who disagree with you lunatics for instance. The unwomanly, unbecoming, angry, bitter repeated manifestation of your ignorance as well. The SBC is worse than the brothers in regards to theological positions. They got a lot wrong while the brothers have less wrong. Both are uncharitable and bitter and wrong. The SBC is more inconsistent rejecting the NO while still being in it.

2Vermont · « **Reply #23 on:** August 20, 2014, 06:29:47 AM »

Quote from: Lover of Truth

Quote from: Cantarella
Clarification for those out there confused:

Genuine Fenneyites HAVE NOTHING TO DO with Dimond Brothers or any lunatic sedevacantists for that matter. They have "stolen" the focus of our crusade: the dogma of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus as it was taught and solemnly proclaimed before the heresy of Modernism and courageously defended by Fr. Leonard Feeney and they have twisted it to fit an unholy purpose.

This is taken so seriously, that sedevacantists cannot be part of the SBC Third Order. They are not welcome.

Authentic "feeneyites" cannot ever be sedevacantists. The comparison or relation to the Dimond Brothers is an insult for which only ignorance is a justifiable excuse.

You have plenty in common with the Dimonds. Calling people who disagree with you lunatics for instance. The unwomanly, unbecoming, angry, bitter repeated manifestation of your ignorance as well. The SBC is worse than the brothers in regards to theological positions. They got a lot wrong while the brothers have less wrong. Both are uncharitable and bitter and wrong. The SBC is more inconsistent rejecting the NO while still being in it.

Well said.

JPaul · « **Reply #24 on:** August 20, 2014, 07:41:57 AM »

Lo?,

Quote

You have plenty in common with the Dimonds. Calling people who disagree with you lunatics for instance. The unwomanly, unbecoming, angry, bitter repeated manifestation of your ignorance as well. The SBC is worse than the brothers in regards to theological positions. They got a lot wrong while the brothers have less wrong. Both are uncharitable and bitter and wrong. The SBC is more inconsistent rejecting the NO while still being in it.

A continuation the gospel of a semi-universalist apostle given this the Twentieth Day of August 2014.