You can see the feeneyites true stripes when confronted repeatedly with truth:

A Commentary on the New Code of Canon Law (Augustine, 1918): Canon 737: "The Church has ever taught that Baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation, - either really or by desire - and that consequently no other sacrament can be validly received without it."

Canon 1239: "Baptism may be received by desire - baptismus flaminis - and this is generally supposed in those who had received instructions in the faith (catechumens)." [Note: "baptismus flaminis" is Latin for "baptism of desire"] 

Canon 2258: "The relation of the individual Catholic to the body of the Church is sometimes styled external communion, whilst his connection with the soul of the Church is called internal communion. This latter communion is not per se severed by excommunication, as grace and charity can not be taken away by the penal sword of the Church, but are lost only through grievous personal guilt. And as this guilt can be repaired by perfect contrition, it may happen that one is excommunicated and yet lives in the friendship of God. Besides, faith and hope may coexist with mortal sin."

More Spam......plain and simple.

Undermining the messenger of truth's positing of Catholic teaching with false accusations.  

Mention that you do not want me to post on a thread about me and that you call me idiot and moron among other things.  And that I post only Catholic teaching.  If this is enough to get one banned I don't want to be here.  

Pope Pius XII (Oct. 29, 1951): Address to the Congress of the Italian Catholic Association of Midwives: "If what We have said up to now deals with the protection and the care of natural life, it should hold all the more in regard to the supernatural life which the newly born infant receives with Baptism. In the present economy there is no other way of communicating this life to the child who has not yet the use of reason. But, nevertheless, the state of grace at the moment of death is absolutely necessary for salvation. Without it, it is not possible to attain supernatural happiness, the beatific vision of God. An act of love can suffice for an adult to obtain sanctifying grace and supply for the absence of Baptism; for the unborn child or for the newly born, this way is not open..."

Looking over this thread I am confused as usual!  Why is it Lad when you started this thread you included his name in the Title, yet you demand he does not post as well as some of your peanut gallery.  

I would think that inserting anothers username would be an invitation, am I wrong on that point?

Just curious!

anyone!

I did not demand that he not post in general.  I insisted that he stop posting irrelevant off-topic spam in order to destroy / derail my thread.  It's basic forum etiquette all over the internet.  If he wants to respond on topic, that's perfectly acceptable.  But he's pasting in generic BoD quotes that have nothing to do with this thread.  I only told him to get off this thread immediately after he refused to abide by my request that he stop spamming generic BoD quotes into this thread.

He also smugly said my post were convincing others against me and proving him right and then starts crying about my posts.  His actions contradict his words, but I don't think we should be surprised.

Your thick brain is utterly incapable of rational thought or logical distinctions.  I am complaining about your SPAM behavior, where you pick one of your favorite little theological pieces, and paste it in one paragraph at a time, post after post after post.  I am not complaining about your posting in general.  I am complaining about this specific behavior.  But you are playing with a single digit IQ and cannot comprehend this ... or any other ... distinction.  In addition, I can't stop you from doing this spamming nonsense on your own threads, but it's a violation of universal forum etiquette to go onto someone ELSE's thread and pollute it this way, derailing the main point under discussion.  That is the very specific behavior to which I object.  In fact, Matthew, who's no friend of "Feeneyites", similarly reprimanded you for this kind of thing.  You were even more wild back then.  You would start about ten threads per day and paste these huge articles into them so that everything else in a forum or sub-forum got squeezed down to the bottom ... rendering it useless for anyone who doesn't want to read your stupid articles (which were 99.999% of CI members).  He restricted you to one such spam thread per day.  Now you're pulling this same crap in other people's threads, and you need to stop it.