You may also have noticed that MOST of us anti-BoDer / pro-EENS Catholics would not waste our time posting if in the process of upholding "BoD" you weren't actually undermining and rejecting Catholic dogma, if you weren't promoting Pelagianism, if you didn't reject Trent's dogmatic teaching regarding the necessity of the Sacraments, if you didn't pervert Traditional Catholic ecclesiology. But you all know full well that this discussion has absolutely NOTHING to do with BoD proper; it's about promoting your twisted ecclesiology. Most of you are Pelagian heretics who deny the necessity of the Sacraments for salvation (with perhaps only one or two among you being exceptions).
If you wanted to say that you thought a catechumen who died without having actually received the Sacrament of Baptism but having received it in desire could be saved, then I would say, "Peace. Go on your way." and wouldn't address it again.
But you rabidly reject the necessity of the Sacraments for salvation. I have actually "served up" on a silver platter for you the answer for how you can both uphold BoD while not rejecting the necessity of the Sacraments for salvation. But you ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to adopt the proper language and the proper Catholic perspective. I can find no other explanation for this other than obstinate Pelagian heresy, because, once again, you have no interest whatsoever in the rare case of a catechumen who dies before being able to be baptized; you're interested in Vatican II "subsistence" ecclesiology wherein any well-meaning pagan, heretic, or schismatic is really an invisible Catholic by virtue of niceness. THAT IS THE PROBLEM I HAVE WITH YOU HERETICS. Even if I were to come around and embrace the opinion of BoD, I would STILL denounce you as heretics.
You strut about sanctimoniously pretending that you're some great defenders of the faith. Quite the contrary. Your defense of BoD causes my stomach to turn and makes me want to vomit it out of my mouth and spit it to the floor. You have done nothing but damage to your precious BoD by wrapping it up in layers of heresy and modernism. I find it repulsive. It is YOU who create "Feeneyites" by your Pelagian and ecclesiological heresies. You think that you're feeding us a prime steak, but then you spread layers of excrement on it and try to force feed it to us. So we find the steak itself repulsive. If you didn't layer your heretical excrement all over the top of BoD, some of us might be more receptive to the concept. So, well done, great heroic defends of the Faith against the great "Feeneyite" heresy of the day. "Bravo, Cushing." "Bad Feeney." Feeney is a greater enemy of the Faith than all the modernists who deny EENS.