Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
These types of posts, while amusing sometimes, do nothing to further the conversation. I'm not saying that they don't have their place every once in a while, but multiple posts like this only clog up the thread. Let's try and keep LoT on topic and engaged in the discussion.
Thank you.
He isn't willing. It's a sad joke, .^. the jokes. Speaking of staying on point, what's the topic of the thread again?
His response shows that the Saints he quoted and the Roman Catechism contradict eachother and he prefers to ignore one and appeal to the other depending on what he's arguing at the time.The Douay Catechism cites as PROOF of BOB the Holy Innocents but the Roman Catechism says that Baptism wasn't obligatory yet when the Holy Innocents were martyred. This would make the Holy Innocents NOT proof of Baptism of Blood.Douay Catechism: " Q. Can a man be saved without baptism? A. He cannot, unless he have it either actual or in desire, with contrition, or to be baptized in his blood as the holy Innocents were, which suffered for Christ."Catechism of the Council of Trent: “Holy writers are unanimous in saying that after the Resurrection of our Lord, when He gave His Apostles the command to go and teach all nations: baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, the law of Baptism became obligatory on all who were to be saved.”
Good point
I understand that they use the Good Thief as an example... C'mon man!! When I asked how the Good Thief could be used as an argument in favor of a BOD, YOU said that "it is the same principal". I'm asking you - what principles of a BOD can be applied to the Good Thief?
I'll discontinue the conversation on this thread and move to the new one...in an orderly fashion.
Thanks. I'm not disagreeing with BD, but that's just it, if things are orderly, then they are easier to find, and that include topics which someone else may find useful or instructive. If naught else, it saves them time looking through the trash for garbage; it permits them to drive on.
I'm the one that started the thread.
The thread about not what it now is, whatever that is.
You hate truth.
If truth were what is being peddled here, then this charge would stick; but as it is, "SAYIN' STUFFFFFFFFFF...."
You believe no salvation apart from water?