Author Topic: Just to be Clear (Read 3223 times)

Ladislaus · « **Reply #5 on:** September 16, 2014, 12:52:30 PM »

Quote from: Cantarella

Up until number 4, there is consistency with immutable Catholic teaching.

After number 4, there is modernist double talk, typical of Vatican II ecclesiology.

Even 5 is technically true. However it's meaningless because Baptism is also required by necessity of means. This is a clever sleight of hand from the Pelagian heretic to pretend that Baptism can be REDUCED to a necessity of precept and so that any inculpable separation from the Church can be salvific.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #6 on:** September 16, 2014, 12:53:45 PM »

In #6 the Pelagian heretic confounds Baptism with the Church.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #7 on:** September 16, 2014, 12:58:06 PM »

#7 - #9 are just completely made up by the Pelagian heretic.

#10 is begging the question by the Pelagian heretic.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #8 on:** September 16, 2014, 01:00:33 PM »

So much for being "clear".

Lover of Truth · « **Reply #9 on:** September 18, 2014, 02:14:17 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Pelagian heretic.

Anyone who calls Monsignor Fenton a Pelagian heretic cannot possibly be Catholic. But we already knew this about you Ladislaus. I pray you cease worshiping your intellect and your ipsi dixits and bow to the truth before you die.