I have just about made up my mind to start a new book. I shall write on the notion of the Church. Nothing like this has appeared since the Council. Within the book I hope to have quite a bit to say about the Council. I must be very careful. If a sincere Catholic writes a book it’s either ignored or brutally attacked. I must make no mistakes. My main thesis will have to be that the Catholic theology on the Church has been improved but in no way changed by the Council.
So much for this "great theologian of the 20th century." In the end, a sellout. If you read the entire context, it almost sounds as if he has to defend this false thesis in the interests of not being "either ignored or brutally attacked".
The book I quote is from 1958. He is not a sellout. You are evil for calling him such. But that is what the Feeneyites do. The make a false accusation, (you are a plegian) then when proved that I did not write it (then Fenton is a sellout). No YOU are the sellout and the liar and non-Catholic, if the choice is between you or Fenton. You know nothing compared to him.
Sixty years after the quote above you are still not clear on SV. He wrote with no hindsight knowing full well that a valid Pope cannot approve and erroneous council. You are evil for disparaging the good saintly, Fathers, Doctors, Saints and theologians. Fenton was vastly more theologically sound that you will ever be in this life. Those are the facts.
Okay. Time for you to invent more lies and justify yourself again at the expense of our Church's great theologians. Ladislaus is write and those who have more knowledge in their pinkies than he can ever hope to obtain in a lifetime are wrong. You are a pitiable man at best ladislaus. I will pray for you.