I'm sick of this madness.
This is not how you do philosophy. Or theology. Or anything, really.
IF Trent says John 3:5 has to be taken literally, as it is written, THEN it necessarily must be true.
You cannot disregard the fact using linguistics, circuмlocutions, lower rank magisterial docuмents, private apparitions, not even the Holy Bible itself.
This has to stop.