CathInfo.com

Please share with us the authority that binds a Catholic under pain of excommunication to hold and profess an idea that is *at best* a theological theory that is neither part of the Universal Ordinary Magisterium or Dogmatic.

We, as Catholics, do not get to pick and choose what we are to believe.  

We, as Catholics, do not get to pick and choose what we are to believe. 

I agree that Catholics do not get to pick and choose "what we are to believe." There are things that all Catholics must believe. There are things that some Catholics may believe but are not required to believe.

Now, can you please respond to my request for you to share with us the authority that binds a Catholic under pain of excommunication to hold and profess an idea that is *at best* a theological theory that is neither part of the Universal Ordinary Magisterium or Dogmatic ?

epiphany is a Pelagian heretic and also a Modernist heretic.  He is to be ignored.  I would have banned him months ago if this were my forum.

He's no Traditional Catholic but is likely here just trolling.

He makes up nonsense about things allegedly taking place a Traditional chapels that no one here has ever heard of, including many of us who have over the years attended many different Traditional chapels, aligned with different groups.

He also promotes a very loose interpretation of when marriages can be annulled, has asserted that there's rampant physical abuse of women by Traditional Catholic men, asserts that the priests defend the abusers and fault the wives for complaining about it, and promotes the Pelagian heresy that unbaptized infants can go to Heaven and enter the Beatific vision.  He has claimed that many/most Traditional Catholic young men want to marry women who would work while they stayed home and did nothing.  All those that I know would be ashamed of such a situation.  Some have, on this account, suspected him of actually being a female, but he's denied that.  So at the very least he's some self-hating man and a misandrist.

I also suspect, but cannot prove, that he was behind some of the troll posts that started appearing in the Anonymous forum after epiphany signed up here recounting some bizarre things taking place at an allegedly-Traditional chapel.

He sees no issue with Pelagian heresy, but then denounces Feeneyism unequivocally as heresy.  In fact, he knows of no other or worse heresy than Feeneyism, giving Modernist heretics a free pass out of a sanctimonious and self-righteous "charity" that he denounces most Traditional Catholics as lacking (but which he has in abundance).  This reminds me of Bergoglio being proud of his humility and excoriating all others for lacking it and not being "as humble as I".

Here's another one who simply doesn't like EENS dogma, and so he comes up with all manner of justification for rejecting it, even accusing those who don't reject it of heresy.  And, really, Feeneyism is the worst heresy he can think of and, in fact, perhaps the only heresy.