Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: John 3:5 defined as Dogma at Trent, Theologian admits (video)  (Read 41918 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: John 3:5 defined as Dogma at Trent, Theologian admits (video)
« Reply #275 on: October 08, 2022, 01:35:03 PM »
epiphany is a Pelagian heretic and also a Modernist heretic.  He is to be ignored.  I would have banned him months ago if this were my forum.

He's no Traditional Catholic but is likely here just trolling.

He makes up nonsense about things allegedly taking place a Traditional chapels that no one here has ever heard of, including many of us who have over the years attended many different Traditional chapels, aligned with different groups.

He also promotes a very loose interpretation of when marriages can be annulled, has asserted that there's rampant physical abuse of women by Traditional Catholic men, asserts that the priests defend the abusers and fault the wives for complaining about it, and promotes the Pelagian heresy that unbaptized infants can go to Heaven and enter the Beatific vision.  He has claimed that many/most Traditional Catholic young men want to marry women who would work while they stayed home and did nothing.  All those that I know would be ashamed of such a situation.  Some have, on this account, suspected him of actually being a female, but he's denied that.  So at the very least he's some self-hating man and a misandrist.

I also suspect, but cannot prove, that he was behind some of the troll posts that started appearing in the Anonymous forum after epiphany signed up here recounting some bizarre things taking place at an allegedly-Traditional chapel.

He sees no issue with Pelagian heresy, but then denounces Feeneyism unequivocally as heresy.  In fact, he knows of no other or worse heresy than Feeneyism, giving Modernist heretics a free pass out of a sanctimonious and self-righteous "charity" that he denounces most Traditional Catholics as lacking (but which he has in abundance).  This reminds me of Bergoglio being proud of his humility and excoriating all others for lacking it and not being "as humble as I".

Here's another one who simply doesn't like EENS dogma, and so he comes up with all manner of justification for rejecting it, even accusing those who don't reject it of heresy.  And, really, Feeneyism is the worst heresy he can think of and, in fact, perhaps the only heresy.
Wrong on every front.  May God have mercy on your soul for such talk.

Perhaps it is you who should be banned for such presuppositions, detractions and calumny against me and others on this forum.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: John 3:5 defined as Dogma at Trent, Theologian admits (video)
« Reply #276 on: October 08, 2022, 07:33:21 PM »
Wrong on every front.  May God have mercy on your soul for such talk.

Perhaps it is you who should be banned for such presuppositions, detractions and calumny against me and others on this forum.

Every point that I made has been demonstrated with quotes from your own postings.  You calumniate me by accusing me of calumny.


Re: John 3:5 defined as Dogma at Trent, Theologian admits (video)
« Reply #277 on: October 08, 2022, 08:56:47 PM »
Every point that I made has been demonstrated with quotes from your own postings.  You calumniate me by accusing me of calumny.
You provided no quotes because they don't exist.

I repeat:
You are wrong on every front.  May God have mercy on your soul for such talk against me.

Perhaps it is you who should be banned for such presuppositions, detractions and calumny against me and others on this forum.



Re: John 3:5 defined as Dogma at Trent, Theologian admits (video)
« Reply #278 on: October 08, 2022, 09:37:22 PM »
It's like every other day people are accusing each other of calumny around here :jester:

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: John 3:5 defined as Dogma at Trent, Theologian admits (video)
« Reply #279 on: October 08, 2022, 10:57:16 PM »
You provided no quotes because they don't exist.

I repeat:
You are wrong on every front.  May God have mercy on your soul for such talk against me.

Perhaps it is you who should be banned for such presuppositions, detractions and calumny against me and others on this forum.


2/3 of my points were demonstrated by other posters using your own posts after you had denied making them.  I merely compiled them in the same place.

As for the heresy, you were shown the dogmatic teaching of the Council of Florence and remained pertinacious in your heresy that infants who die without Baptism can be saved.

I can find your own words to back up every single thing I wrote in that post except for the part where I explicitly stated that "I suspect".