Have I spotted a Dimond Doppelgänger?
Hence, denial of the said doctrine of the Church would seem to constitute heresy.
Oh so the Catechism of Trent is heretical then?
It is Heresy to deny BOB and BOD they have always been believed.
Haha. I ask the same to you. Is the Catechism heretical?
You feeneyites are not theologians and you do not understand the meaning of the sentences(which are more specific in Latin) that you quote,
Oh, and you are a theologian?
also everyone at Trent believed in BOD and BOB.
Oh really?
Catechism of the Council of Trent, Baptism made obligatory after Christ’s Resurrection, p. 171: “Holy writers are unanimous in saying that after the Resurrection of our Lord, when He gave His Apostles the command to go and teach all nations: baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, the law of Baptism became obligatory on all who were to be saved.”
Father Feeney was Excuмmunicated by Cadinal Ottiavani under Pope Pius XII because of his denial of BOD and BOB and only had the Excommunication lifted by Pope Paul VI(which Sede's wouldn't see as valid anyway) in an act of ecuмanism which in and of itself I believe would nullify the lifting of said excom since Excommunications are not vindicative penalties they are medicinal and the offender is supposed to repent before the penalty is lifted.
You're grasping at straws with this, and you reveal your ignorance on the matter.
1- Feeney wasn't excommunicated by Ottaviani
2- His "excommunication" had nothing to do with matters of doctrine, it was because he refused to go to Rome because they ignored the law and didn't present the reasons for his summons
3- All the "clergymen" were hetretics anyways by the time of Feeney. He wrote a letter to all the bishops at the time asking about the salvation dogma and got only 3 positive responses.
4- More importantly, the case of Father Feeney had nothing to do with the other two "baptisms", it was about the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla sallus. The "baptisms" were not the subject of debate, it was whether you could be saved only as a Catholic or not, which all the "clergymen" at the time didn't believe in anymore!
So you (and anyone else) bringing up the Feeney case just shows how dishonest you are.
I would ask that this person be banned, he has just accused Pope Pius XII of heresy, aswell as the good Cardinals and Priests prior to Vatican II.
By the way, Father Feeney's condemnation contrary to what you say had nothing to do with "Outside the Church there is no salvation" that is a lie, it was because he denied that the Catechumens were members of the Church through Baptism of Desire. You have been lied to and are then spreading the lie hopefully for your sake unknowingly.