My response that that implicit baptism pertains to souls who never had a chance to accept or deny the faith was in response to the assertion that such had denied the faith.
In other words, they are no different from the ones described as "
anonymous Christians" by chief VII theologian, Rahner:
The pagan after the beginning of the Christian mission, who lives in the state of Christ’s grace through faith, hope and love, yet who has no explicit knowledge of the fact that his life is orientated in grace-given salvation to Christ.
And notice it is the "implicit" nature of these acts of Faith, Hope, and Charity, which distinguishes “anonymous Christians” from the
visible Christians VII Council was referring to in Lumen Gentium.
So not only the OP thinks that a single belief in just one, really any one, article of the true religion, suffices for salvation, but this belief can also be
"implicit" so at the end, anyone in a false religion can be said to be an invisible Catholic, belonging to an invisible Church.