St. Thomas Aquinas:
"If, however, some were saved without receiving any revelation, they were not saved without faith in a Mediator, for, though they did not believe in Him explicitly, they did, nevertheless, have implicit faith through believing in Divine providence, since they believed that God would deliver mankind in whatever way was pleasing to Him, and according to the revelation of the Spirit to those who knew the truth, as stated in Job 35:11: “Who teacheth us more than the beasts of the earth.”
STh II-II q. 2 a. 7 ad 3
I would like to discuss this now.
I have never heard anyone other than a Feeneyite assert Aquinas erred here.
But as I understand the Feeneyite mind:
1) Lefebvre was a modernist for allegedly teaching implicit faith;
2) St. Thomas likewise was a modernist teaching implicit faith;
3) All the post-Tridentine theologians are modernists for preaching implicit faith;
4) St. Alphonsus was a mushhead, and not knowing what Trent taught, maintained an heretical position condemned by Trent;
5) The popes who declared anyone might follow the teachings of St. Alphonsus were modernists for leading people into Alphonsus's errors;
6) All these are wrong, and the Feeneyites are right.
Does that more or less sum it up?