Quote from: Disputaciones

Quote from: Truth is Eternal

Quote from: ManuelChavez

I believe I can fly.
I believe I can touch the sky.
I think about it every night and day;
Spread my wings and fly away.

- - -

The Oath against Modernism will suffice...

Thank you for publically affirming the necessity of believing, without innovations, all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Are you a Feeneyite?

Feeneyite is not a word.

I believe, without innovation, all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Quote from: Disputaciones

Quote from: Truth is Eternal

Quote from: Disputaciones

Quote from: Truth is Eternal

Quote from: ManuelChavez

I believe I can fly.
I believe I can touch the sky.
I think about it every night and day;
Spread my wings and fly away.

- - -

The Oath against Modernism will suffice...

Thank you for publically affirming the necessity of believing, without innovations, all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Are you a Feeneyite?

Feeneyite is not a word.

I believe, without innovation, all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

So you ARE a Feeneyite. I seem to remember some hint of Dimondism in your posts. I think you're a dogmatic sede too. Are you?

You and me both believe, without innovation, all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Quote from: roscoe

Infallible Constitution of RC Church

http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/V1.HTM#4 & #6

This is not an endorsement of EWTN

 :reporter:

Thank you for publically affirming the necessity of believing, without innovations, all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Quote from: Truth is Eternal

Quote from: roscoe

Infallible Constitution of RC Church

http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/V1.HTM#4 & #6

This is not an endorsement of EWTN

 :reporter:

Thank you for publically affirming the necessity of believing, without innovations, all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Why do you keep repeating the same thing over and over again like a drone? Do you realize you come off as a nutcase?

Quote from: Truth is Eternal

The poll question is the question at the bottom of this thread.

Any member posting to this thread will be a public admission and endorsement of the necessity to believe, without innovation(s), all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

If any of your beliefs are heretical, being contrary to the Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the Catholic Church, you will have to create your own thread to promote a heretical public profession of belief.  Please do not post in this topic if you knowingly, with innovation(s), deny any Infallibly Defined Dogma(s) of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

I am gathering a list of “www.Cathinfo.com” screennames of people who are willing to admit, because they are not ashamed of the gospel of Christ and they are not ashamed of the Infallible Dogmas of the Catholic Church, they believe without Innovation(s), all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

If you believe it is wrong to attempt to add innovations to any Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the Catholic Church, please post a public profession of belief.

I, Truth is Eternal, believe, without innovation(s), all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Do you Believe, Without Innovation(s), all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the Catholic Church?

Pope Pius IX to Archbishop Scherr of Munich in 1863:

"We desire to reassure ourselves that they did not mean to limit the obligation, which strictly binds Catholic teachers and writers, to those things only which are proposed by the infallible judgment of the Church as dogmas of faith to be believed by everybody. In a like manner, We are convinced that it was not their intention to state that the perfect adherence to revealed truths (which they regard as absolutely necessary for true progress in science and for refuting errors) can be maintained, if the submission of faith is given only to those dogmas expressly defined by the Church. The reason for this is the following: even supposing that we are treating of that subjection which is to be made by an explicit act of divine faith, this must not be limited to those things which have been defined in the express decrees of the ecuмenical councils or of the Roman Pontiffs of this See; but it must also be extended to those things which, through the ordinary teaching of the whole Church throughout the world, are proposed as divinely revealed and, as a result, by universal and constant consent of Catholic theologians are held to be matters of faith. "

Pope Pius XII, Humani Generis, 1950:

"It is not to be thought that what is set down in Encyclical Letters does not demand assent in itself, because in this the popes do not exercise the supreme power of their magisterium. For these matters are taught by the ordinary magisterium, regarding which the following is pertinent: "He who heareth you, heareth me." [Luke 10:16]; and usually what is set forth and inculcated in the Encyclical Letters, already pertains to Catholic doctrine. But if the Supreme Pontiffs in their acts, after due consideration, express an opinion on a hitherto controversial matter, it is clear to all that this matter, according to the mind and will of the same Pontiffs, cannot any longer be considered a question of free discussion among the theologians."