Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: How can you defend the salvation dogma with...  (Read 7184 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 14727
  • Reputation: +6067/-906
  • Gender: Male
How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
« Reply #90 on: October 22, 2013, 05:24:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It is a real question - you just won't answer it.

    As I said, Trent explains it as it is to be understood - they do this precisely so that you do not do what you are doing and so that it cannot be interpreted into teaching something it does not teach.

    Whether done on purpose or not, you misunderstand the nature of dogmatic definitions. Definitions by their nature are to define what we believe. Some context is helpful but not necessary.  One doesn't interpret a definition, one either accepts it or rejects it. As or me, I accept it as Trent teaches it.

    You reject Trent's definitions for a teaching which teaches something completely contradictory, all the while insisting you are doing no such thing. All the while claiming that you are following the teaching of the Church - well, helloooooo, what is Trent if not "the Church"? What is Trent if not the supreme authority over all the Fathers forever? Why would Trent risk relying on anyone else to interpret defined dogma - that is how errors spread.

    You wish to think the Holy Ghost through Trent was either incompetent or  incapable of teaching precisely what it meant to teach in words the whole world can understand and accept *for the good of their salvation* - or reject under the pretense that a better and a more profound understanding avails somewhere - yours is an idea which V1 explicitly condemned.





    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Conspiracy_Factist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 598
    • Reputation: +157/-19
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #91 on: October 22, 2013, 07:20:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Quote from: gooch
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    God left us a treasury of graces which can be applied to non-members of the Church and help bring them to salvation through conversion or through being attached to the Church at the moment of death. It is quite humbling to consider how just one Ave uttered from our lips, or indulgence applied for a soul who is not a member of the Church, or a soul of God's choice, can be enough to be the difference between its salvation and damnation. You and I can be the difference between whether one is faithfully departed or not. We all should pray for the gift of perseverance and for a happy death.


    can you give me an example of what happens in detail here  "  being attached to the Church at the moment of death"
    would this involve baptism? any creeds to believe in..if it's at the moment of death and the non believer is incapacitated in some way is there any chance he can truly convert and make it to heaven?


    A non-member of the Catholic Church/the Mystical Body of Christ, outside of which there is no salvation, and there are no exceptions to this Dogma, can die within the Church in a state of sanctifying grace.

    Sanctifying grace cannot be obtained outside the Church but actual graces can.  Actual graces nudge the good willed soul toward membership within the Church.  If such as soul is on his way to becoming a member of the Church and dies before this actually happens he can be saved within the Church through his attachment to it by desire.  

    Inculpable ignorance by itself does not save a person.  Much more is needed.  Desire to be within the Church by itself does not save a person either by itself in combined with inculpable ignorance.  Neither inculpable ignorance nor desire saves anyone.

    For it to be possible for a non-member to be saved attached to the Church or "within" it one must have an effective desire to enter it.  This means that the person believes, with a supernatural faith, that God exists and that He rewards good and evil and at least implicitly believes in the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation at a very minimum for salvation to even be possible.  No one can be saved without a supernatural Faith.  But even this is not enough for a non-member to be saved within the Catholic Church or from him to be brought to safety by the vessel/Church he is attached to.

    He must also love God with the love of benevolence.  He must love God with the love of supernatural charity above all things and desire to conform to His will.

    But not just a loose desire to do God's will.  He must actually try his best throughout his life to do God's will.

    An example of an ineffective desire by analogy would be if I desired to go to New York.  "Boy I sure wish I could go to New York" but do nothing about it.

    "Boy I sure hope I'm doing what I should to get to Heaven."

    But desiring to get to the right destination by itself is not enough, even if you are not sure where the destination is or how to get there.  One can have an effective desire to get to New York even if, through no fault of his own, he does not know where it is or how to get there or even the name of the place where he wants to be if he starts asking people, "where is 'the big city' and how do I get there?  

    "I need to get on a plane?  How do I do this?  Tickets?  Where can I get them?  How much do they cost?  I don't have any money.  Do you know where I can get a job?"

    "How do I get to Heaven?  I have die within the Church?  Which Church?  The Catholic Church?  Why the Catholic Church?  Because God founded it?  How did He found it?  Etc.  She teaches I can't have sex outside of marriage or use conception prevention?"

    Here the good willed are separated from the bad willed:

    Either:
    "Oh boy!  The Catholic Church can't be right"  

    Or:
    "Okay, if it is God's will I will comply." "How do I become a member?"  "I need to get baptized?  Okay, let's do it.  I have to learn catechism first?  When can I start?"

    You can see the difference between an ineffective desire and an effective desire here can't you?

    Did you see in the above example where he could have become willfully blind or ignorant and been damned for that culpable ignorance?  

    Now if our good willed person dies on any step of the journey in a state of sanctifying grace he dies within the Church and goes to Heaven, probably after some Purgatory time unless he is martyred for the Faith whereby he will go straight to Heaven.  

    But this good willed person, and our example must actually be good willed in the eyes of God, our eyes do not matter here, he will, at the very least have a supernatural Faith in God's existence based upon God's own revelation and believe that God rewards good and punishes evil.  He will try his best throughout His life to conform to God's will and love God with the love of charity, loving Him above all things and being willing to suffer all rather than to offend Him.  So long as he has this effective desire, even if he has mistaken notions of what God's will actually is, and so long as he tries his best to do God's will he is on the road to salvation.

    Each and every human being in existence is either in the Kingdom of God or the Kingdom of Satan.  There is no other place for them to be located.  

    Those who have an aversion to God by willing something or loving something more than God are in the Kingdom of Satan, whether they realize it or not, and if they die in that state will surely be damned.

    Those who have a supernatural faith and a perfect charity and will to do God's will and try their best to do God's will throughout their life can only accomplish such things while in a state of sanctifying grace.  It is impossible to love God with the love of charity and to continue to try your best to do His will for an extended period of time without being in a state of sanctifying grace according to Saint Thomas and others.  And one cannot be in a state of sanctifying grace while being outside the Church.  But as we have seen non-members of the Church can be attached to that Church or theologically "within" her so long as all the other prerequisites are present.  

    Maybe some get into Heaven after only working one hour same as those who worked twelve.  But those of us who worked twelve should not complain about it.  God will have mercy on whom He has mercy.  

    God does not give a person the actual graces needed to join the Church without giving such a person the ability and means to accomplish that goal.  God does not cut down the good willed and damn him through no fault of his own even as he was trying his best to do God’s will and was on a journey that would have led to formal membership in the Church were he allowed to continue.  God is perfectly merciful and perfectly just.  He is not an arbitrary tyrant who excludes the heart and only looks at the letter.  “No water Baptism, too bad for you.”  The good willed are not damned any more than the bad willed are saved.  It comes down to the heart, supernatural faith and charity which encompasses willing to do God's will, whatever it is and trying your best to do it and preferring to suffer anything rather than to offend Him.  God will not damn such a person anymore than he will save one who goes to daily Mass, prays 15 decades of the Rosary daily but dies in a state of mortal sin.

    Does any of this seem plausible?

      The thing is as I see it,if there is this good willed person, who wants to be catholic, wants to be baptised, wouldn't God in His merciful way allow this person to be baptised before his death?

    can you explain in more detail your following quotes

    "Non-members of the Roman Catholic Church can be joined to God through the Roman Catholic Church without realizing it."

    how can this happen, what is the  thought process of the jew who can be joined to God through the Church without realizing it? I have a hard time understanding what you are precisely talking about



    "noting that they become actual members at the moment of death."

    again,pls explain this to me, what happened to this person before dying, did he make a profession of gfaith? was he baptised?

    "and that non-members of that Church can be saved"

    pls explain, I thought your position was non members become members at death.or without realizing it.yet still become members......now are you saying non members who stay as non members and die as nonmembers can be saved??


    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #92 on: October 22, 2013, 07:27:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Stubborn
    It is a real question - you just won't answer it.

    As I said, Trent explains it as it is to be understood - they do this precisely so that you do not do what you are doing and so that it cannot be interpreted into teaching something it does not teach.

    Whether done on purpose or not, you misunderstand the nature of dogmatic definitions. Definitions by their nature are to define what we believe. Some context is helpful but not necessary.  One doesn't interpret a definition, one either accepts it or rejects it. As or me, I accept it as Trent teaches it.

    You reject Trent's definitions for a teaching which teaches something completely contradictory, all the while insisting you are doing no such thing. All the while claiming that you are following the teaching of the Church - well, helloooooo, what is Trent if not "the Church"? What is Trent if not the supreme authority over all the Fathers forever? Why would Trent risk relying on anyone else to interpret defined dogma - that is how errors spread.

    You wish to think the Holy Ghost through Trent was either incompetent or  incapable of teaching precisely what it meant to teach in words the whole world can understand and accept *for the good of their salvation* - or reject under the pretense that a better and a more profound understanding avails somewhere - yours is an idea which V1 explicitly condemned.


    If I am in error, you could simply provide some authority that explains the canons the way you understand them. This surely exists, unless you are just flat wrong.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #93 on: October 23, 2013, 05:44:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: gooch
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Quote from: gooch
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    God left us a treasury of graces which can be applied to non-members of the Church and help bring them to salvation through conversion or through being attached to the Church at the moment of death. It is quite humbling to consider how just one Ave uttered from our lips, or indulgence applied for a soul who is not a member of the Church, or a soul of God's choice, can be enough to be the difference between its salvation and damnation. You and I can be the difference between whether one is faithfully departed or not. We all should pray for the gift of perseverance and for a happy death.


    can you give me an example of what happens in detail here  "  being attached to the Church at the moment of death"
    would this involve baptism? any creeds to believe in..if it's at the moment of death and the non believer is incapacitated in some way is there any chance he can truly convert and make it to heaven?


    A non-member of the Catholic Church/the Mystical Body of Christ, outside of which there is no salvation, and there are no exceptions to this Dogma, can die within the Church in a state of sanctifying grace.

    Sanctifying grace cannot be obtained outside the Church but actual graces can.  Actual graces nudge the good willed soul toward membership within the Church.  If such as soul is on his way to becoming a member of the Church and dies before this actually happens he can be saved within the Church through his attachment to it by desire.  

    Inculpable ignorance by itself does not save a person.  Much more is needed.  Desire to be within the Church by itself does not save a person either by itself in combined with inculpable ignorance.  Neither inculpable ignorance nor desire saves anyone.

    For it to be possible for a non-member to be saved attached to the Church or "within" it one must have an effective desire to enter it.  This means that the person believes, with a supernatural faith, that God exists and that He rewards good and evil and at least implicitly believes in the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation at a very minimum for salvation to even be possible.  No one can be saved without a supernatural Faith.  But even this is not enough for a non-member to be saved within the Catholic Church or from him to be brought to safety by the vessel/Church he is attached to.

    He must also love God with the love of benevolence.  He must love God with the love of supernatural charity above all things and desire to conform to His will.

    But not just a loose desire to do God's will.  He must actually try his best throughout his life to do God's will.

    An example of an ineffective desire by analogy would be if I desired to go to New York.  "Boy I sure wish I could go to New York" but do nothing about it.

    "Boy I sure hope I'm doing what I should to get to Heaven."

    But desiring to get to the right destination by itself is not enough, even if you are not sure where the destination is or how to get there.  One can have an effective desire to get to New York even if, through no fault of his own, he does not know where it is or how to get there or even the name of the place where he wants to be if he starts asking people, "where is 'the big city' and how do I get there?  

    "I need to get on a plane?  How do I do this?  Tickets?  Where can I get them?  How much do they cost?  I don't have any money.  Do you know where I can get a job?"

    "How do I get to Heaven?  I have die within the Church?  Which Church?  The Catholic Church?  Why the Catholic Church?  Because God founded it?  How did He found it?  Etc.  She teaches I can't have sex outside of marriage or use conception prevention?"

    Here the good willed are separated from the bad willed:

    Either:
    "Oh boy!  The Catholic Church can't be right"  

    Or:
    "Okay, if it is God's will I will comply." "How do I become a member?"  "I need to get baptized?  Okay, let's do it.  I have to learn catechism first?  When can I start?"

    You can see the difference between an ineffective desire and an effective desire here can't you?

    Did you see in the above example where he could have become willfully blind or ignorant and been damned for that culpable ignorance?  

    Now if our good willed person dies on any step of the journey in a state of sanctifying grace he dies within the Church and goes to Heaven, probably after some Purgatory time unless he is martyred for the Faith whereby he will go straight to Heaven.  

    But this good willed person, and our example must actually be good willed in the eyes of God, our eyes do not matter here, he will, at the very least have a supernatural Faith in God's existence based upon God's own revelation and believe that God rewards good and punishes evil.  He will try his best throughout His life to conform to God's will and love God with the love of charity, loving Him above all things and being willing to suffer all rather than to offend Him.  So long as he has this effective desire, even if he has mistaken notions of what God's will actually is, and so long as he tries his best to do God's will he is on the road to salvation.

    Each and every human being in existence is either in the Kingdom of God or the Kingdom of Satan.  There is no other place for them to be located.  

    Those who have an aversion to God by willing something or loving something more than God are in the Kingdom of Satan, whether they realize it or not, and if they die in that state will surely be damned.

    Those who have a supernatural faith and a perfect charity and will to do God's will and try their best to do God's will throughout their life can only accomplish such things while in a state of sanctifying grace.  It is impossible to love God with the love of charity and to continue to try your best to do His will for an extended period of time without being in a state of sanctifying grace according to Saint Thomas and others.  And one cannot be in a state of sanctifying grace while being outside the Church.  But as we have seen non-members of the Church can be attached to that Church or theologically "within" her so long as all the other prerequisites are present.  

    Maybe some get into Heaven after only working one hour same as those who worked twelve.  But those of us who worked twelve should not complain about it.  God will have mercy on whom He has mercy.  

    God does not give a person the actual graces needed to join the Church without giving such a person the ability and means to accomplish that goal.  God does not cut down the good willed and damn him through no fault of his own even as he was trying his best to do God’s will and was on a journey that would have led to formal membership in the Church were he allowed to continue.  God is perfectly merciful and perfectly just.  He is not an arbitrary tyrant who excludes the heart and only looks at the letter.  “No water Baptism, too bad for you.”  The good willed are not damned any more than the bad willed are saved.  It comes down to the heart, supernatural faith and charity which encompasses willing to do God's will, whatever it is and trying your best to do it and preferring to suffer anything rather than to offend Him.  God will not damn such a person anymore than he will save one who goes to daily Mass, prays 15 decades of the Rosary daily but dies in a state of mortal sin.

    Does any of this seem plausible?

      The thing is as I see it,if there is this good willed person, who wants to be catholic, wants to be baptised, wouldn't God in His merciful way allow this person to be baptised before his death?

    can you explain in more detail your following quotes

    "Non-members of the Roman Catholic Church can be joined to God through the Roman Catholic Church without realizing it."

    how can this happen, what is the  thought process of the jew who can be joined to God through the Church without realizing it? I have a hard time understanding what you are precisely talking about



    "noting that they become actual members at the moment of death."

    again,pls explain this to me, what happened to this person before dying, did he make a profession of gfaith? was he baptised?

    "and that non-members of that Church can be saved"

    pls explain, I thought your position was non members become members at death.or without realizing it.yet still become members......now are you saying non members who stay as non members and die as nonmembers can be saved??


    God's permissive will allows for a person to die before he becomes an actual member.  Even though that is opposed to His actual will.  God does not force anything.

    A non-member who dies within the Church becomes a member of the Church Suffering or the Church Triumphant at death.  

    A non-member can not be "joined to" "within" or "attached" to the Church unless he has a supernatural faith and perfect charity and dies in a state of sanctifying grace, if he dies in this state he is baptized with the baptism of the Holy Ghost otherwise known as the baptism of "desire" and becomes a full fledged member of the Catholic Church Suffering or Triumphant.  
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14727
    • Reputation: +6067/-906
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #94 on: October 23, 2013, 05:45:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Stubborn
    It is a real question - you just won't answer it.

    As I said, Trent explains it as it is to be understood - they do this precisely so that you do not do what you are doing and so that it cannot be interpreted into teaching something it does not teach.

    Whether done on purpose or not, you misunderstand the nature of dogmatic definitions. Definitions by their nature are to define what we believe. Some context is helpful but not necessary.  One doesn't interpret a definition, one either accepts it or rejects it. As or me, I accept it as Trent teaches it.

    You reject Trent's definitions for a teaching which teaches something completely contradictory, all the while insisting you are doing no such thing. All the while claiming that you are following the teaching of the Church - well, helloooooo, what is Trent if not "the Church"? What is Trent if not the supreme authority over all the Fathers forever? Why would Trent risk relying on anyone else to interpret defined dogma - that is how errors spread.

    You wish to think the Holy Ghost through Trent was either incompetent or  incapable of teaching precisely what it meant to teach in words the whole world can understand and accept *for the good of their salvation* - or reject under the pretense that a better and a more profound understanding avails somewhere - yours is an idea which V1 explicitly condemned.


    If I am in error, you could simply provide some authority that explains the canons the way you understand them. This surely exists, unless you are just flat wrong.


    There is no "if" about it, you are in error as I have already repeatedly communicated to you. Even you know you're in error, this is obvious - otherwise you would not avoid answering the question I asked.


    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #95 on: October 23, 2013, 05:48:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    "The dogmatic section of the Mystici Corporis is divided into two parts. In the first part the Holy Father describes the Church as the Mystical Body of Christ. In the second he tells about the union of the faithful with our Lord.
     Fenton

    Does anyone disagree with the above statement?
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14727
    • Reputation: +6067/-906
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #96 on: October 23, 2013, 05:54:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth

    God's permissive will allows for a person to die before he becomes an actual member.  Even though that is opposed to His actual will.  God does not force anything.

    A non-member who dies within the Church becomes a member of the Church Suffering or the Church Triumphant at death.  

    A non-member can not be "joined to" "within" or "attached" to the Church unless he has a supernatural faith and perfect charity and dies in a state of sanctifying grace, if he dies in this state he is baptized with the baptism of the Holy Ghost otherwise known as the baptism of "desire" and becomes a full fledged member of the Catholic Church Suffering or Triumphant.  


    This is Novus Ordo double speak perfectly exemplified.

    A non-member remains a non-member so long as he rejects the graces offered to become a member, or would be offered if he were to accept them.

    A non-member dies outside the Church, not within it and has no chance for salvation - that's the fate which awaits all non-members (and even most members).



     
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #97 on: October 23, 2013, 07:04:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Stubborn
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Stubborn
    It is a real question - you just won't answer it.

    As I said, Trent explains it as it is to be understood - they do this precisely so that you do not do what you are doing and so that it cannot be interpreted into teaching something it does not teach.

    Whether done on purpose or not, you misunderstand the nature of dogmatic definitions. Definitions by their nature are to define what we believe. Some context is helpful but not necessary.  One doesn't interpret a definition, one either accepts it or rejects it. As or me, I accept it as Trent teaches it.

    You reject Trent's definitions for a teaching which teaches something completely contradictory, all the while insisting you are doing no such thing. All the while claiming that you are following the teaching of the Church - well, helloooooo, what is Trent if not "the Church"? What is Trent if not the supreme authority over all the Fathers forever? Why would Trent risk relying on anyone else to interpret defined dogma - that is how errors spread.

    You wish to think the Holy Ghost through Trent was either incompetent or  incapable of teaching precisely what it meant to teach in words the whole world can understand and accept *for the good of their salvation* - or reject under the pretense that a better and a more profound understanding avails somewhere - yours is an idea which V1 explicitly condemned.


    If I am in error, you could simply provide some authority that explains the canons the way you understand them. This surely exists, unless you are just flat wrong.


    There is no "if" about it, you are in error as I have already repeatedly communicated to you. Even you know you're in error, this is obvious - otherwise you would not avoid answering the question I asked.


    Your opinion is duly noted. Now, why don't you help me by citing a source?

    Either you can't (because the citation doesn't exist) or you won't because your errors have blinded you to the fact you could be wrong.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil


    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #98 on: October 23, 2013, 07:09:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    "Pope Pius XII begins his first section by telling why the Catholic Church is aptly described as a body. He informs us that the Church is thus described because it is a visible and organized, possessing a visible rite of initiation, visible sacramental worship and visible members. It is called the body of Christ because our Lord is at once its founder, its head and its support. The term Mystical Body of Christ is applied to the Church since it is distinct from our Lord's physical body and at the same time superior to an ordinary society or moral body in that it has a principle of unity absolutely independent of and superior to the members.
    Fenton

    Is there anything incorrect in the above quote?
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14727
    • Reputation: +6067/-906
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #99 on: October 23, 2013, 11:47:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB


    Your opinion is duly noted. Now, why don't you help me by citing a source?

    Either you can't (because the citation doesn't exist) or you won't because your errors have blinded you to the fact you could be wrong.


    Right after you answer my question.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #100 on: October 23, 2013, 01:44:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    "In the second section of the dogmatic, the Mystici Corporis speaks of the two types of bonds or communications by which men are joined to Christ within the Church. Those men who are united to our Lord by professing His faith, being subject to the legitimate spiritual rulers He has set over His sheepfold, and partaking in the Eucharistic worship which He instituted, are said to be joined in bodily and visible communication with Christ. The second type of communication is spiritual and invisible. It consists in the three theological virtues of faith, hope and charity. Our union with Christ is perfected by God the Holy Ghost dwelling within us. It is expressed in the Eucharistic sacrifice, which is pre-eminently the Act of the Mystical Body.
     Fenton

    Is the above correct?
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14727
    • Reputation: +6067/-906
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #101 on: October 23, 2013, 06:11:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Quote
    "In the second section of the dogmatic, the Mystici Corporis speaks of the two types of bonds or communications by which men are joined to Christ within the Church. Those men who are united to our Lord by professing His faith, being subject to the legitimate spiritual rulers He has set over His sheepfold, and partaking in the Eucharistic worship which He instituted, are said to be joined in bodily and visible communication with Christ. The second type of communication is spiritual and invisible. It consists in the three theological virtues of faith, hope and charity. Our union with Christ is perfected by God the Holy Ghost dwelling within us. It is expressed in the Eucharistic sacrifice, which is pre-eminently the Act of the Mystical Body.
     Fenton

    Is the above correct?


    You keep asking Fenton if the above is correct - but I think you have the wrong forum - there's no Fenton on CI.

    Bad joke, I know

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Conspiracy_Factist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 598
    • Reputation: +157/-19
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #102 on: October 23, 2013, 06:57:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Quote from: gooch
    Quote from: L
    [/quote

      The thing is as I see it,if there is this good willed person, who wants to be catholic, wants to be baptised, wouldn't God in His merciful way allow this person to be baptised before his death?

    can you explain in more detail your following quotes

    "Non-members of the Roman Catholic Church can be joined to God through the Roman Catholic Church without realizing it."

    how can this happen, what is the  thought process of the jew who can be joined to God through the Church without realizing it? I have a hard time understanding what you are precisely talking about



    "noting that they become actual members at the moment of death."

    again,pls explain this to me, what happened to this person before dying, did he make a profession of gfaith? was he baptised?

    "and that non-members of that Church can be saved"

    pls explain, I thought your position was non members become members at death.or without realizing it.yet still become members......now are you saying non members who stay as non members and die as nonmembers can be saved??


    God's permissive will allows for a person to die before he becomes an actual member.  Even though that is opposed to His actual will.  God does not force anything.

    A non-member who dies within the Church becomes a member of the Church Suffering or the Church Triumphant at death.  

    A non-member can not be "joined to" "within" or "attached" to the Church unless he has a supernatural faith and perfect charity and dies in a state of sanctifying grace, if he dies in this state he is baptized with the baptism of the Holy Ghost otherwise known as the baptism of "desire" and becomes a full fledged member of the Catholic Church Suffering or Triumphant.  

    I understand a catechumen who's studying to be a catholic, rejects his Jєωιѕн religion for example...dies before baptism...this would be a case for baptism of desire...I get that, I might not agree with it but I understand someone holding that view...what I fail to comprehend is how that belief leads to this quote which I assume you agree with?

    Against the Heresies, by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre:

     
    Page 216: “Evidently, certain distinctions must be made.  Souls can be saved in a religion other than the Catholic religion (Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism, etc.), but not by this religion.  There may be souls who, not knowing Our Lord, have by the grace of the good Lord, good interior dispositions, who submit to God...But some of these persons make an act of love which implicitly is equivalent to baptism of desire.  It is uniquely by this means that they are able to be saved.”
    a jew

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #103 on: October 24, 2013, 06:03:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Gooch,

    I am supposing you are sincere and truly want to get to the bottom of the issue.  If you are you will read the following which is 90% Fenton.  Please read the following articles from the bottom up and bring up any quote from Fenton that you either are not sure about or disagree with and we'll talk:

    http://www.dailycatholic.org/2013ftt.htm

    installment 87: The Allocution: Singulari Quadam

    installment 86: The Decree for the Jacobites: Cantate Domino

    installment 85: The Dogmatic Decree on Salvation: Unam Sanctam

    installment 84: The Dogma of Salvation and the Fourth Lateran Council

    installment 83: The Dogma of Salvation in Official Pronouncements of the Church

    installment 82: Some Sources of Misunderstanding

    installment 81: Introduction to The Catholic Church and Salvation

    installment 80: Father Fenton's "The Use of the Terms Body and Soul with Reference to the Catholic Church

    installment 79: Definition of Faith for the Dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus

    installment 78: No Salvation Outside the Church

    installment 77: Membership In and Visibility of the Church

    installment 76: Definitive Definition of the Mystical Body of Christ

    installment 75: On the Mystical Body of Christ
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #104 on: October 24, 2013, 08:10:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Stubborn
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Quote
    "In the second section of the dogmatic, the Mystici Corporis speaks of the two types of bonds or communications by which men are joined to Christ within the Church. Those men who are united to our Lord by professing His faith, being subject to the legitimate spiritual rulers He has set over His sheepfold, and partaking in the Eucharistic worship which He instituted, are said to be joined in bodily and visible communication with Christ. The second type of communication is spiritual and invisible. It consists in the three theological virtues of faith, hope and charity. Our union with Christ is perfected by God the Holy Ghost dwelling within us. It is expressed in the Eucharistic sacrifice, which is pre-eminently the Act of the Mystical Body.
     Fenton

    Is the above correct?


    You keep asking Fenton if the above is correct - but I think you have the wrong forum - there's no Fenton on CI.

    Bad joke, I know


    Why don't you quote the correct explanation if Fenton is wrong ... or is it you CAN'T quote anything because it simply doesn't exist?
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil