Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: How can you defend the salvation dogma with...  (Read 7294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jehanne

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2561
  • Reputation: +459/-11
  • Gender: Male
How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
« Reply #30 on: October 19, 2013, 06:30:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pelele
    This is his comment on Singulari Quidem:

    Quote
    Heretical and schismatics sects are not a means of salvation, and those who adhere to them have no hope of heaven, unless they are excused from fault because of invincible ignorance.


    Sanborn's quotes on invincible ignorance are all over the place in that docuмent.


    One cannot be unconscious of mortal sin.  People who rob banks know what they are doing is wrong; if they didn't, why do they run away?

    Does a Protestant who is baptized in his/her infancy know that the Catholic Church is the One True Church, and if so, at what age does this occur?  Seven?  Fourteen?  What if the Protestant is mentally retarded?

    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #31 on: October 19, 2013, 06:34:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How can anyone with a straight face say that ALL the clear dogmatic decrees on EENS are not to be read as clearly written, and yet tell one that this unclear, ambiguous, undefined, fallible letter's line really means that one can be saved without the sacrament of baptism, without desire for baptism, without desire to be Catholic, without explicit faith in at least the Incarnation and the Trinity, and without knowledge that the Catholic Church even exists?


    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #32 on: October 19, 2013, 06:35:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne
    Quote from: Pelele
    Again, he says nobody can hope for life or salvation outside the Church, UNLESS you are EXCUSED through ignorance beyond your control.

    So plainly it says that you have some shot at being saved outside the Church if you are excused through ignorance beyond your control.


    No, it does not say that, because Pope Pius IX, in the very same letter, stated:

    Quote
    . You see, dearly beloved sons and venerable brothers, how much vigilance is needed to keep the disease of this terrible evil from infecting and killing your flocks. Do not cease to diligently defend your people against these pernicious errors. Saturate them with the doctrine of Catholic truth more accurately each day. Teach them that just as there is only one God, one Christ, one Holy Spirit, so there is also only one truth which is divinely revealed. There is only one divine faith which is the beginning of salvation for mankind and the basis of all justification, the faith by which the just person lives and without which it is impossible to please God and to come to the community of His children. There is only one true, holy, Catholic church, which is the Apostolic Roman Church. There is only one See founded in Peter by the word of the Lord, outside of which we cannot find either true faith or eternal salvation. He who does not have the Church for a mother cannot have God for a father, and whoever abandons the See of Peter on which the Church is established trusts falsely that he is in the Church.[4] Thus, there can be no greater crime, no more hideous stain than to stand up against Christ, than to divide the Church engendered and purchased by His blood, than to forget evangelical love and to combat with the furor of hostile discord the harmony of the people of God.[5] (Singulari Quidem, 4)


    So, unless you are going to say that Pope Pius IX contradicted himself, anyone outside the Catholic Church who is "hoping" for eternal life must still end his/her life "in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."  That is what Pope Pius IX is saying!


    That's what you would have to say, that he contradicted himself.

    One the one hand, he says there is absolutely no salvation if you're outside the Church, none, zip, but on the other hand, if you're in invincible ignorance, you have a shot.

    It's a clear contradiction just like saying "the Sacrament of Baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation" and then in the next sentence saying "baptism of desire or blood is a substitute".

    The two of them can't be true at the same time: either it is ABSOLUTELY necessary to be baptized and a Catholic, or it is NOT.

    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #33 on: October 19, 2013, 06:37:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: bowler
    How can anyone with a straight face say that ALL the clear dogmatic decrees on EENS are not to be read as clearly written, and yet tell one that this ambiguous, undefined, fallible letter's line really means that one can be saved without the sacrament of baptism, without desire for baptism, without desire to be Catholic, without explicit faith in at least the Incarnation and the Trinity, and without knowledge that the Catholic Church even exists?


    Well that's my problem: how will i tell anyone that you NEED to be Catholic and have the true Faith when a Pope says there are exceptions?

    That's why i said this whole invincible ignorance thing is scandalous.

    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #34 on: October 19, 2013, 06:38:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pelele
    One the one hand, he says there is absolutely no salvation if you're outside the Church, none, zip, but on the other hand, if you're in invincible ignorance, you have a shot.


    Those who were "invincibly ignorant" would still have to end their lives "in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."  As with a mentally retarded Protestant who was baptized in his/her infancy, they would simply be excused from their ignorance of the One True Faith.  On the other hand, perhaps their ignorance of the Catholic Faith would only rise to the level of being a venial sin and not a mortal one, so they would, when they died, go to Purgatory as opposed to eternal Hell.

    Quote from: Pelele
    Well that's my problem: how will i tell anyone that you NEED to be Catholic and have the true Faith when a Pope says there are exceptions?


    There are no exceptions.  Pope Pius IX states this clearly.


    Offline Alcuin

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 269
    • Reputation: +91/-0
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #35 on: October 19, 2013, 06:41:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pelele
    Quote from: Jehanne
    Quote from: Pelele
    You could read Quanto Conficiamur Moerore in that way, but i dont see how the same can be said about Singulari Quidem.


    Read your OP:

    Quote
    Singulari Quidem: Outside of the Church, nobody can hope for life or salvation unless he is excused through ignorance beyond his control.


    A Jew, Muslim, Buddhist, and even, an atheist, can all hope that they will go to Heaven; such does not mean that they will go to Heaven.  I can hope that I will win the Lottery just by playing, but that does not necessarily mean that my "hope" will result in bags of money!


    Again, he says nobody can hope for life or salvation outside the Church, UNLESS you are EXCUSED through ignorance beyond your control.

    So plainly it says that you have some shot at being saved outside the Church if you are excused through ignorance beyond your control.


    How about this - one who is outside the Church through ignorance beyond his control will be brought into the Church in an extraordinary way. God will only lift the veil if one's heart is not darkened by wilful ignorance.

    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #36 on: October 19, 2013, 06:41:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne
    Quote from: Pelele
    One the one hand, he says there is absolutely no salvation if you're outside the Church, none, zip, but on the other hand, if you're in invincible ignorance, you have a shot.


    Those who were "invincibly ignorant" would still have to end their lives "in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."  As with a mentally retarded Protestant who was baptized in his/her infancy, they would simply be excused from their ignorance of the One True Faith.  On the other hand, perhaps their ignorance of the Catholic Faith would only rise to the level of being a venial sin and not a mortal one, so they would, when they died, go to Purgatory as opposed to eternal Hell.


    Yes i agree with all this but the point is that Pius IX seemed to say some people are excused and get a pass.

    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #37 on: October 19, 2013, 06:41:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pelele
    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: Pelele
    Why is it that Fr. Michael Muller, when he dealt with Pius IX and I.I., didn't even mention Singulari Quidem, which was the first time the Pope mentioned I.I.? It is the most "objectionable" of the 3, but he didn't even address it.

    Maybe it's a corruption of the original Encyclical? Maybe it doesn't appear in the original?

    Bob Dimond wrote a whole book about the salvation dogma and he even wrote about Pius IX but he didn't even address Singulari Quidem either.

    Why would that be?


    Who is Bob Dimond?


    "Brother" Peter Dimond of course.

    Robert is his real name.


    Dimond covers SQ on page 98 to 100 of my older hard copy edition. It is entitled Singulari Quadem, an Allocution (A Speech to the Cardinals)

    it says "it is not even an encyclical".


    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #38 on: October 19, 2013, 06:43:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Alcuin
    How about this - one who is outside the Church through ignorance beyond his control will be brought into the Church in an extraordinary way. God will only lift the veil if one's heart is not darkened by wilful ignorance.


    Sure, why not?!

    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #39 on: October 19, 2013, 06:44:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: Pelele
    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: Pelele
    Why is it that Fr. Michael Muller, when he dealt with Pius IX and I.I., didn't even mention Singulari Quidem, which was the first time the Pope mentioned I.I.? It is the most "objectionable" of the 3, but he didn't even address it.

    Maybe it's a corruption of the original Encyclical? Maybe it doesn't appear in the original?

    Bob Dimond wrote a whole book about the salvation dogma and he even wrote about Pius IX but he didn't even address Singulari Quidem either.

    Why would that be?


    Who is Bob Dimond?


    "Brother" Peter Dimond of course.

    Robert is his real name.


    Dimond covers SQ on page 98 to 100 of my older hard copy edition. It is entitled Singulari Quadem, an Allocution (A Speech to the Cardinals)

    it says "it is not even an encyclical".


    That is a different one, it is not Singulari QUIDEM, but QUADAM. They even mispelled it.

    Quidem is from 1856 and Quadam from 1854, they are not the same.

    I believe Ibranyi said that the Dimonds just say Pius IX was wrong there.

    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #40 on: October 19, 2013, 06:45:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Alcuin
    Quote from: Pelele
    Quote from: Jehanne
    Quote from: Pelele
    You could read Quanto Conficiamur Moerore in that way, but i dont see how the same can be said about Singulari Quidem.


    Read your OP:

    Quote
    Singulari Quidem: Outside of the Church, nobody can hope for life or salvation unless he is excused through ignorance beyond his control.


    A Jew, Muslim, Buddhist, and even, an atheist, can all hope that they will go to Heaven; such does not mean that they will go to Heaven.  I can hope that I will win the Lottery just by playing, but that does not necessarily mean that my "hope" will result in bags of money!


    Again, he says nobody can hope for life or salvation outside the Church, UNLESS you are EXCUSED through ignorance beyond your control.

    So plainly it says that you have some shot at being saved outside the Church if you are excused through ignorance beyond your control.


    How about this - one who is outside the Church through ignorance beyond his control will be brought into the Church in an extraordinary way. God will only lift the veil if one's heart is not darkened by wilful ignorance.


    If that's what he would have said in the Encyclical, it would have been fine, but that's not what hes said, and that's the problem.


    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #41 on: October 19, 2013, 06:52:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pelele
    If that's what he would have said in the Encyclical, it would have been fine, but that's not what hes said, and that's the problem.


    Well, that was stated at the First Vatican Council, which, of course, came after Singulari Quidem:

    Quote
    To this witness is added the effective help of power from on high. For, the kind Lord stirs up those who go astray and helps them by his grace so that they may come to the knowledge of the truth; and also confirms by his grace those whom he has translated into his admirable light, so that they may persevere in this light, not abandoning them unless he is first abandoned.


    So, we may assume that the above is the authentic meaning of Singulari Quidem.

    Offline Pelele

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 185
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #42 on: October 19, 2013, 06:59:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Is the original available anywhere? Was it in latin or in another language?

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #43 on: October 19, 2013, 07:14:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    SJB's answer is the answer I would give, so I'm stumped as to why SJB would answer as I would. Did I miss something during my absence from CI?


    You must have been missing the same thing when you were here.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    How can you defend the salvation dogma with...
    « Reply #44 on: October 19, 2013, 09:14:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote
    SJB's answer is the answer I would give, so I'm stumped as to why SJB would answer as I would. Did I miss something during my absence from CI?


    You must have been missing the same thing when you were here.


    Games, games, what a waste of time it is to talk to you.