CathInfo.com

I'm comfortable with this.

It's heretical to say that someone can be saved without Baptism.  Even in the hypothetical case of BoD, the Sacrament of Baptism remains the instrumental cause of justification, operating through the votum.  I have repeatedly explained to BoDers how they must formulate BoD theory in order to avoid heresy, but most of them have refused the non-heretical formulation out of pride.

I don't believe in BoD because I believe that the character of Baptism is essential to the grace conferred, that membership in the Church is necessary for salvation, that there is no being "within" the Church without being a member of the Church, and because we cannot be adopted children of God and thus enter into the inner life of the Holy Trinity without God recognizing us as His sons ... due to the imprint of His Son's character in our souls.

I'd be much less uncomfortable with a BoD that also posited reception of the character of Baptism.

Saint Thomas Aquinas is a Doctor of the Church, "considered one of the Catholic Church's greatest theologians".
This last post of yours is a classic logical fallacy, the strawman argument, whereby you are attempting to attribute to me something that I have never said.  My position on Baptism of Desire is well within the boundaries defined by the Church.  No where, and at no time, have I every postured anything contrary to Church teaching.  I provide authoritative, on topic, Church references to the discussion, and never ever stray into personal conjecture.  This sub-forum is ripe with dishonest debate tactics, something so contrary to Catholic charity that I really can't rationalize the sub-forum's presence within this Catholic forum.