Author Topic: Fr. Stepanich on Outside of the Church There is No Salvation (Read 22458 times)

Elizabeth · « **Reply #50 on:** July 21, 2009, 08:04:44 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

Apparently Martin Stepanich believes the fraudulent docuмent allegedly ex-communicating Fr Feeney. For what it's worth I would like to know if he attacks Card Rampolla. imo anyone who believes the calumny against this great man of the Church is basically referring to Leo XIII, Pius X and Pius XI( Card Raphael) as anti-popes-- talk about dangerous. Ciao

So it's "Martin Stepanich" not Fr. Stepanich? But our distinguished theologians are benevolent enough to use the term "Fr. Feeney"?

Fr. Stepanich has been a holy traditional priest for over 60 years.

Christ have mercy.

roscoe · « **Reply #51 on:** July 21, 2009, 08:37:06 PM »

I am confused because the man is attacking Fr Feeney. This is why I have asked if he still feels the same way as when he wrote the hit piece in 1974.

It has been stated that he believes JP2 and Ben 16 are illegal. What about John 23, Paul 6 and JP1? Does he recognise the election of Gregory XVII as Dawn, myself and PFT do? What about the v2 'council'?

roscoe · « **Reply #52 on:** July 21, 2009, 08:44:56 PM »

Dawn has just PM d me and I now know that Fr Stepanich does not recognise the v2 anti-popes beg w/ john 23.

If this is true (and I have no reason not to trust Dawn) then why is the v2 Eliz enamoured with the man?

Elizabeth · « **Reply #53 on:** July 21, 2009, 10:46:22 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

Dawn has just PM d me and I now know that Fr Stepanich does not recognise the v2 anti-popes beg w/ john 23.

If this is true (and I have no reason not to trust Dawn) then why is the v2 Eliz enamoured with the man?

"why is the v2 Eliz enamoured with the man?"

V2 Eliz, now that's cute :baby:

roscoe · « **Reply #54 on:** July 21, 2009, 11:01:08 PM »

Is it correct that you accept Roncalli, Montini, Luciani, Woyteka(sp) and Ratzinger as true popes or no?