Starts around 35 minute mark
Fr. Jenkins unfortunately speaks half truths, hopefully out of ignorance.
Fr. Feeney did not have 3 different teachings on the same subject, he was not summoned to Rome due to these three different teachings. Fr. Feeney did not say why he would not go to Rome so how come everyone presumes to know why he didn't go?
And since the Cardinal Pizzardo of the Holy Office never divulged the reason for the summons, how is it that everyone seems to already know why Cardinal Pizzardo summoned him?
All Fr. Feeney ever said was basically that he would be glad to go, but under the norms of Canon Law, Cardinal Pizzardo was required to give him the reason that he was being summoned - which he never never gave him, as such, per canon law, he was not legally obliged to go.
Instead of slandering Fr. Feeney for not going, why is it that no one ever asks why the Cardinal Pizzardo refused to tell him why he was summoned?
I only listened to about 30 seconds and it's the same old crap, nothing new.